Abstract
The present study investigated the conditions under which shifts to more extreme attitudes may result from attitude-consistent behavior. Subjects agreed to deliver arguments favoring stricter controls on water pollution (a consonant position) either to passersby on a street corner (Proselytizing Act) or to a tape recorder for research use (Tape Recording Act). Half the time a confederate agree to perform the same act (about a different issue) either because he believed in the issue (Belief-Relevant Cue) or because he wanted to help the study along (Belief-Irrelevant Cue). Subjects in the Proselytize-Belief Relevant condition adopted a more extreme attitude favoring controls on water pollution relative to subjects in the remaining conditions, consistent with our analysis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
