Group-Induced Polarization in Simulated Juries

Abstract

Group-induced shift effects observed on other response dimensions were extended to a simulated jury setting. Subjects first responded to eight hypothetical traffic cases which varied in the implication of guilt (high or low), then discussed half of these cases (two high guilt and two low guilt) in small groups, and finally responded again to all eight cases. As predicted, the simulated jury deliberations polarized the mean judgment of discussed cases. After discussing low guilt cases, subjects were, on the average, more extreme in their judgments of innocence and more lenient in recommended punishment, and after discussing high guilt cases shifted toward harsher judgments of guilt and punishment. These effects were not observed for cases which were not discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson, N.H. Information integration theory: A brief survey. In D. H. Krantz , R. C. Atkinson , R. D. Luce , and P. Suppes (Eds.), Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology, Vol. 2. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman , 1974.

Kalven, H.G. & Zeisel, H. The American jury. Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1966.

Kaplan, M. & Kemmerick, G.D. Juror judgment as information integration: Combining evidential and nonevidential information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 30, 493-499.

Myers, D.G. & Lamm, H. The group polarization phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin , in press.

Pruitt, D.G. Choice shifts in groups discussion: An introductory review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971 , 20, 339-360.

Walker, T.G. & Main, E.C. Choice-shifts in political decision making: Federal judges and civil liberties cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1973, 2, 39-48.