Research on social hypothesis-testing processes has demonstrated that there is a strong preference for seeking and using hypothesis-confirming evidence when testing hypotheses about other people. An experiment was conducted to examine the extent to which expertise in a particular knowledge domain represents a delimiting condition of this inferential tendency. Expert and novice subjects completed a hypothesis-testing recall task. Recall differences in line with the different strategies commonly used by experts and novices on problem-solving and reasoning tasks were predicted. As expected, novices recalled more hypothesis-matching evidence after a delay interval, regardless of the nature of the hypothesis to be tested. Expert recall, by contrast, was not characterized by this confirmatory preference when experts tested the hypothesis inside their domain of expertise. The extent to which these expert/novice differences provide support for motivated social cognition is discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alloy, L. B. , & Tabachnik, N. (1984). Assessment of covariation by humans and animals: The joint influence of prior expectations and current situational information. Psychological Review, 91, 112-149.
2.
Arkes, H. R. , & Harkness, A. (1983) Estimates of contingency between two dichotomous variables. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 117-135.
3.
Bassok, M. , & Trope, Y. (1984). People's strategies for testing hypotheses about another's personality: Confirmatory or diagnostic?Social Cognition, 2, 199-213.
4.
Borgida, E. , & Brekke, N. (1981). The base rate fallacy in attribution and prediction. In J. H. Harvey, W. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.). New directions in attribution research (Vol. 3). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5.
Borgida, E. , & Howard-Pitney, B. (1983). Personal involvement and the robustness of perceptual salience effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 560-570.
6.
Cantor, N. , & Kihlstrom, J. F. (Eds.). (1981). Personality, cognition, and social interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
Chase, W. G. , & Simon, H. A. (1973). The mind's eye in chess. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing. New York: Academic Press.
8.
Chi, M. T. H. , & Koeske, R. (1983). Network representation of a child's dinosaur knowledge. Developmental Psychology, 19, 29-39.
9.
Fiske, S. T. , & Kinder, D. T. (1981). Involvement, expertise, and schema use: Evidence from political cognition. In N. Cantor & J. F. Kihlstrom (Eds.), Personality, cognition, and social interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
Fiske, S. T. , Kinder, D. T., & Larter, W. M. (1983). The novice and the expert: Knowledge-based strategies in political cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 381-400.
11.
Fiske, S. T. , & Taylor, S. E. (1984). Social cognition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
12.
Harkness, A. R. , DeBono, K. G., & Borgida, E. (1985). Personal involvement and strategies for making contingency judgments: A stake in the dating game makes a difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 22-32.
13.
Hays, W. L. (1973). Statistics for the social sciences. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
14.
Higgins, E. T. , & Bargh, J. A. (1987). Social cognition and social perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 3694-3626.
15.
Johnson, P. E. , Hassebrock, F., Duran, A. S., & Moller, J. H. (1982). Multimethod study of clinical judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30, 201-230.
16.
Klayman, J. , & Ha, Y. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Review, 94, 211-228.
17.
Larkin, J. , McDermott, J., Simon, D., & Simon, H. (1980). Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Science, 20, 1335-1342.
18.
Markus, H. , & Zajonc, R. B. (1985). The cognitive perspective in social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
19.
McKeithen, K. B. , Reitman, J. S., Rueter, H. H., & Hirtle, S. C. (1981). Knowledge organization and skill differences in computer programmers. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 307-325.
20.
Sherman, S. J. , & Corty, E. (1984). Cognitive heuristics. In R. S. Wyer & T. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 1. pp. 189-286). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21.
Showers, C. , & Cantor, N. (1985). Social cognition: A look at motivated strategies. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 275-306.
22.
Skov, R. B. , & Sherman, S. J. (1986). Information-gathering processes: Diagnosticity, hypothesis confirmatory strategies, and perceived hypothesis confirmation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 93-121.
23.
Snyder, M. (1981). Seek, and ye shall find: Testing hypotheses about other people. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24.
Snyder, M. , & Cantor, N. (1979). Testing hypotheses about other people: The use of historical knowledge. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 330-342.
25.
Snyder, M. , & Gangestad, S. (1981). Hypothesis-testing processes. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 3). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26.
Snyder, M. , & Swann, W. B., Jr. (1978). Hypothesis-testing processes in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1202-1212.
27.
Srull, T. K. , & Wyer, R. S., Jr. (1986). The role of chronic and temporary goals in social information processing. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 503-549). New York: Guilford Press.
28.
Trope, Y. , & Bassok, M. (1982). Confirmatory and diagnosing strategies in social information gathering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 22-34.
29.
Trope, Y. , & Bassok, M. (1983). Information-gathering strategies in hypothesis-testing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 560-576.
30.
Trope, Y. , Bassok, M., & Alon, E. (1984). The questions lay interviewers ask. Journal of Personality, 52, 90-106.
31.
Trope, Y. , & Mackie, D. M. (1987). Sensitivity to alternatives in social hypothesis-testing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 445-459.
32.
Wilson, P. (1981). Taking the library out of library education. American Librarian, 12, 321-325.
