Good Samaritans—-or Priests and Levites?

Abstract

Guided by the spirit of William James, a research strategy is outlined for addressing the question whether the motivation to help associated with a devout, intrinsic, end orientation to religion is altruistic or egoistic. Conceptual analysis of the distinction between altruism and subtle forms of egoism suggests two egoistic motives to help that could easily be associated with intrinsic, end religion: (a) avoidance of social and self-punishment in the form of shame or guilt; (b) acquisition of social and self-rewards in the form of praise or esteem. Three research procedures are described that have been used to determine whether the motivation to help associated with intrinsic, end religion is directed toward one of these egoistic goals or whether the motivation is truly altruistic.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allport, G. W. (1966). Religious context of prejudice. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 5, 447-457.

Batson, C. D. (1987). Prosocial motivation: Is it ever truly altruistic? In L Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 65-122). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

Batson, C. D. (in press). The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Batson, C. D. , & Flory, J. D. (1990). Goal-relevant cognitions associated with helping by individuals high on intrinsic, end religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 29, 346-360.

Batson, C. D. , Dyck, J. L. , Brandt, J. R. , Batson, J. G. , Powell, A. L. , McMaster, M. R. , & Griffitt, C. (1988). Five studies testing two new egoistic alternatives to the empathy-altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 52-77.

Batson, C. D. , Oleson, K. C. , Weeks, J. L. , Healy, S. P. , Reeves, P. J. , Jennings, P. , & Brown, T. (1989). Religious prosocial motivation: Is it altruistic or egoistic? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 873-884.

Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. New York: Oxford University Press.

Geller, V. , & Shaver, P. (1976). Cognitive consequences of self-awareness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 99-108.

Gorsuch, R. L. , & McFarland, S. (1972). Single-vs. multiple-item scales for measuring religious values. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 11, 53-65.

10.

Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.

11.

James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Holt.

12.

James, W. (1902). The varieties of religious experience. New York: Longman.

13.

Jones, E. E. , & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

14.

Lewin, K. (1935). Dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.

15.

Mandler, G. (1984). Mind and body: Psychology of emotion and stress. New York: Norton.

16.

Moscovici, S. (1985). Social influence and conformity. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology: Vol. 2. Special fields and applications (3rd ed., pp. 347-412). New York: Random House.

17.

Nelson, L. D. , & Dynes, R. R. (1976). The impact of devotionalism and attendance on ordinary and emergency helping behavior. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 15, 47-59.

18.

Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of norms. New York: Harper.

19.

Stroop, J. R. (1938). Factors affecting speed in serial verbal reactions. Psychological Monographs, 50, 38-48.

20.

Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35-57.

21.

Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.