This study investigated the effects of causal attributions for group performance on Preferences for structural change in resource dilemmas. Six-person groups performed a resource management task in which members harvested resource units from a common, replenishable pool. All subjects. received preprogrammed feedback that their group had failed to maintain the common resource. After 10 harvest trials, subjects voted whether to elect a group leader to manage the common pool in a second session. In a 2 × 2 factorial design, two variables were manipulated: perceived cause of group performance (task difficulty, personal greed) and attribution questionnaire (present, absent). As expected, a higher proportion of task difficulty subjects voted for a group leader than did personal greed subjects. This finding suggests that causal attributions for group performance moderate the perceived effectiveness of the structural change, thereby influencing numbers'choices in a manner consistent with structural goal/expectation theory of instrumental cooperation in social dilemmas.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allison, S.T., & Messick, D.M. (1985). The group attribution error. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 563-579.
2.
Brechner,K.C. (1977). An experimental analysis of social traps. Journal. of ExperimentalSocial Psychology, 13, 552-564.
3.
Cass, R.C., & Edney,J.J. (1978). The commons dilemma: A simulation testing resource visibility and territorial division. HumanEcology, 6, 371-386.
4.
Edney, J.J., & Harper, C.S. (1978). The effects of information in a resource management problem: A social trap analog. Human Ecology, 6,387-395.
5.
Enzle, M.C., & Schopflocher, D. (1978). Instigation of attribution processes by attribution questions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 4, 595-599.
6.
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science , 162,1243-1248.
7.
Hobbes, T. (1937). Leviathan. London: J. M. Dent. (Original work published 1651)
8.
Kerr, N.L. (1983). Motivation losses in small groups: A social dilemma analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45,819-828.
9.
Komorita, S.S., & Barth, J.M. (1985). Components of reward in social dilemmas. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 48,364-373.
10.
Kramer, R.M., & Brewer, M.B. (1984). Effects of group identity on resource use in a simulated commons dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46,1044-1057.
11.
Leary, M.R., & Forsyth, D.R. (1987). Attributions of responsibility for collective endeavors. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 167-168.
12.
Messick, D.M., Allison, S.T., & Samuelson, C.D. (1988). Framing and communication effects on group members' responses to social and environmental uncertainty . In S. Maital (Ed.), Applied behavioural economics (Vol. 2). Brighton, England: Wheatsheaf.
13.
Messick, D.M., & Brewer, M.B. (1983). Solving social dilemmas: A review. Review of Personality and Social Psychology4, 11-44.
14.
Messick, D.M., & McClelland, C.L. (1983). Social traps and temporal traps. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9,105-110.
15.
Messick, D.M., Wilke, H., Brewer, M.B., Kramer, R.M., Zemke, P.E., & Lui, L. (1983). Individual adaptations and structural change as solutions to social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 294-309.
16.
Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective actionCambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
Orbell, J.M., van de Kragt, A.J.C., & Dawes, R.M. (1988). Explaining discussion-induced cooperation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54,811-819.
18.
Parker, R., Lui, L., Messick, G., Messick, D.M., Brewer, M.B., Kramer, R., Samuelson, G., & Wilke, H. (1983). A computer laboratory for studying resource dilemmas . Behavioral Science, 28,298-304.
19.
Platt, J. (1973). Social traps. American Psychologist , 28,641-651.
20.
Pruitt, D.G., & Kimmel, M. (1977). Twenty years of experimental gaming: Critique, synthesis, and suggestions for the future. Annual Review of Psychology28, 363-392.
21.
Roby, T.B. (1968). Small group performance. Skokie, II. Rand McNally.
22.
Rutte, C.G., & Wilke, H.A.M. (1984). Social dilemmas and leadership. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 105-121.
23.
Samuelson, C.D., & Messick, D.M. (1986a). Alternative structural solutions to resource dilemmas. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 37, 139-1SS.
24.
Samuelson, C.D., & Messick, D.M. (1986b). Inequities in access to and use of shared resources in social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 51,960-967.
25.
Samuelson, C.D., & Messick, D.M. (in press). When do people want to change the rules for allo cating shared resources? In D. Schroeder (Ed.), Social dilemmasNew York: Praeger.
26.
Samuelson, C.D., Messick, D.M., Rutte, C.G., & Wilke, H. (1984). Individual and structural solutions to resource dilemmas in two cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 94-104.
27.
Sato, K. (1987). Distribution of the cost for maintaining common resources. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23,19-31.
28.
Schelling, T.C. (1960). The strategy of conflictCambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
Schroeder, D.A., Jensen, T.D., Reed, A.J., Sullivan, D.K., & Schwab, M. (1983). The actions of others as determinants of behavior in social trap situations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 19, 522-539.
30.
Thibaut,J.W., & Kelley, H.H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.
31.
Wilke, Ham., Rutte, C.G., Wit, A.P., Messick, D.M., & Samuelson, C.D. (1986). Leadership in social dilemmas: Efficiency and equity. In HA.M. Wilke , D. M. Messick, & C. G. Rutte (Eds.), Experimental social dilemmas (pp. 55-76). Frankfurt-am-Main: Verlag Peter Lang.
32.
Yamagishi,T. (1986a). The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51,110-116.
33.
Yamagishi, T. (1986b). The structural goal/expectation theory of cooperation in social dilemmas. In E.J. Lawler & B. Markovsky (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 3). Greenwich, GT: jAI.
34.
Yamagishi, T. (1988). The provision of a sanctioning system in the United States and Japan. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51,265-271.
