Students involved in dating relationships attended four weekly sessions, at which they either introspected about why they felt the way they did about their relationship or introspected about an unrelated topic. As predicted, at Week I people who introspected about reasons brought to mind thoughts that were inconsistent with their initial feelings about their relationships and changed their attitudes in the direction of those reasons. This attitude change persisted throughout the study but did not increase. People in the control condition showed an increasing amount of attitude change at each session, such that by the end of the study they had changed as much as people in the reasons condition. It is suggested that either thinking about reasons or answering detailed questions about a relationship can change the way people construe that relationship, leading to attitude change.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bishop, G. E. (1987). Experiments with the middle response alternative in survey questions. Pubic Opinion Quarterly, 51, 220-232.
2.
Erber, M. W. , Hodges, S. D., & Wilson, T. D. (in press). Attitude strength and attitude stability. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
Feldman, J. M. , & Lynch, J. G., Jr. (1988). Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 421-435.
4.
Fenigstein, A. , Scheier, M. E., & Buss, A. H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 522-527.
5.
Fichhoff, B. , Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1980). Knowing what you want Measuring labile values. In T. S. Wallsten (Ed.), Cognitive processes in choice and decision behavior (pp. 117-141). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
Freund, T. , Kruglanski, A. W., & Shpitzajzen, A. (1985). The freezing and unfreezing of impression primacy: Effects of the need for structure and the fear of invalidity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin11, 479-487.
7.
Higgins, E. T. (1989). Knowledge accessibility and activation: Subjectivity and suffering from unconscious sources. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 75-123). New York: Guilford.
8.
Hippler, H. J. , Schwarz, N., & Sudman, S. (Eds.). (1987). Social information processing and survey methodology. New York: Springer-Verlag.
9.
Hogarth, R. M. (1982). Question framing and response contingency. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10.
Johnson, R. W. , MacArthur, A., & Wright, E. R. (1991). Timing of reasons analysis and attitude-behavior consistency. Psychological Reports, 69, 603-608.
11.
Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge Cognitive and motivational base. New York: Plenum.
12.
Kruglanski, A. W. , & Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and unfreezing of lay inferences: Effects on impression primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology;, 19, 448-468.
13.
Millar, M. G. , & Tesser, A. (1986a). Effects of affective and cognitive focus on the attitude-behavior relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 270-276.
14.
Millar, M. G. , & Tesser, A. (1986b). Thought-induced attitude change: The effects of schema structure and commitmentJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 259-269.
15.
Millar, M. G. , & Tesser, A. (1989). The effects of affective-cognitive consistency and thought on the attitude-behavior relation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 189-202.
16.
Nisbett, R. E. , & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know-.Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
17.
Nowlis, V. (1964). Research with the Mood Adjective Checklist. In S. L. Tomikins & C. E Izard (Eds.), Affect cognition, and pesonaity: Empirical studies (pp. 352-389). New York: Springer.
18.
Rubin, Z. (1973). Liking and loving. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
19.
Rubin, Z. , & Mitchell, C. (1976). Couples research as couples counseling Some unintended effects of studying close relationships. American Psychologist, 31, 17-25.
20.
Salancik, G. R. (1974). Inference of one's attitude from behavior recalled under linguistically manipulated cognitive sets. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 415-427.
21.
Schuman, H. , & Presser, S. (1981). Questions and answers in attitude surveys. New York: Academic Press.
22.
Seligman, C. , Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1980). Effects of salience of extrinsic rewards on liking and loving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 453-460.
23.
Smith, T. W. (1987). That which we call welfare by any other name would smell sweeter. An analysis of the impact of question wording on response patterns. Pubic Opinion Quarter, 51, 75-83.
24.
Snyder, D. K. , & Wills, R. M. (1989). Behavioral versus insight-oriented marital therapy: Effects on individual and interspousal functioning. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 39-46.
25.
Snyder, D. K. , Wills, R. M., & Grady-Fletcher, A. (1991). Long-term effectiveness of behavioral versus insight-oriented marital therapy: A 4-year follow-up study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 138-141.
26.
Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526-537.
27.
Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15-28.
28.
Strack, F. , & Martin, L. L. (1987). Thinking, judging, and communicating: A process account of context effects in attitude surveys. In H. J. Hippler, N. Schwarz, & S. Sudman (Eds.), Social information processing and survey methodology (pp. 123-148). New York: Springer-Verlag.
29.
Surra, C. A. (1987). Reasons for changes in commitment: Variations by courtship type. Journal of Personal and Social Relationships, 4, 17-33.
30.
Surra, C. A. , Arizzi, P., & Asmussen, L. A. (1988). The association between reasons for commitment and the development and outcome of marital relationships. Journal of Personal and Social Relationships, 5, 47-63.
31.
Tesser, A. (1978). Self-generated attitude change. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 289-338). New York: Academic Press.
32.
Tesser, A. , Leone, C., & Clary, G. (1978). Affect control: Process constraints versus catharsis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2, 265-274.
33.
Tourangeau, R. , & Rasinski, K. A. (1988). Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 299-314.
34.
Turner, C. , & Martin, E. (Eds.). (1984). Surveying subjecive phenomena (Vol. 1). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
35.
Veroff, J. , Hatchett, S., & Douvan, E. (in press). Consequences of participating in a longitudinal study of marriage. Pubic Opinion Quarterly
36.
Wilson, T. D. (1990). Self-persuasion via self-reflection. In J. ML Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Self-inference processes: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 6, pp. 43-67). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
Wilson, T. D. , & Dunn, D. S. (1986). Effects of introspection on attitude-behavior consistency: Analyzing reasons versus focusing on feelings. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 249-263.
38.
Wilson, T. D. , Dunn, D. S., Bybee, j. A., Hyman, D. B., & Rotondo, J. A. (1984). Effects of analyzing reasons on attitude-behavior consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 5-16.
39.
Wilson, T. D. , Dunn, D. S., Kraft, D., & Lisle, D. J. (1989). Introspection, attitude change, and attitude-behavior consistency: The disruptive effects of explaining why we feel the way we do. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
40.
Wilson, T. D. , & Hodges, S. D. (1992). Attitudes as temporary constructions. In A. Tesser & L. Martin (Eds.), The construction of social judgment. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41.
Wilson, T. D. , Kraft, D., & Dunn, D. S. (1989). The disruptive effects of explaining attitudes: The moderating effect of knowledge about the attitude objectJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 379-400.
42.
Wilson, T. D. , & LaFleur, S. J. (1992). [Effects of analyzing reasons on the accuracy of self-predictions]. Unpublished data, University of Virginia.
43.
Wilson, T. D. , Lisle, D. J., Schooler, J., Hodges, S. D., Klaaren, K. J., & LaFleur, S. J. (1993). Introspecting about reasons can reduce post choice satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 331-339.
44.
Wilson, T. D. , & Schooler, J. (1991). Thinking too much: Introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decision. Journal of Personally and Social Psychology, 60, 181-192.
45.
Wilson, T. D. , & Stonej. I. (1985). Limitations of self-knowledge: More on telling more than we can know. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 167-183.
