Contrasting predictions ofByrne's similarity-attraction hypothesis and Rosenbaum's dissimilarity-repulsion hypothesis were tested with 7-, 11-, 15-, and 21-year-olds in Singapore. The study included a control condition of no-attitude information and two experimental conditions of similar and dissimilar attitudes. Measures of attraction, assumed similarity of attitudes, and accuracy in perceiving the manipulations were taken. The repulsion hypothesis was supported with the two younger groups; the attraction hypothesis was supported with the two older groups. The repulsion effect emerged because the two younger groups assumed a high level of attitudinal similarity in the control condition of no-attitude information and because they inaccurately perceived the manipulated similarity of attitudes in the experimental conditions. These results reaffirm the similarity-attraction hypothesis and further demonstrate the role of age-related cognitive processes in interpersonal attraction.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aristotle . (1932). The rhetoic. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
2.
Byrne, D. (1961). Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 71 3-715.
3.
Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
4.
Byrne, D. , Clore, G. L., & Smeaton, G. (1986). The attraction hypothesis: Do similar attitudes affect anything?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1167-1170.
5.
Byrne, D. , & Griffitt, D. (1966). A developmental investigation of the law of attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 699-702.
6.
Byrne, D. , & Nelson, D. (1965). Attraction as a linear function of proportion of positive reinforcements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 659-663.
7.
Byrne, D. , & Wong, T. J. (1962). Racial prejudice, interpersonal attraction, and assumed similarity of attitudes. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 246-253.
8.
Clore, G. L. , & Baldridge, B. (1968). Interpersonal attraction: The role of agreement and topic interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 340-346.
9.
Condon, J. W. , & Crano, W. D. (1988). Inferred evaluation and the relation between attitude similarity and interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 789-797.
10.
Drigotas, S. M. (1993). Similarity revisited: A comparison of similarity-attraction versus dissimilarity-repulsion. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 365-377.
11.
Duck, S. (1973). Similarity and perceived similarity of personal constructs as influences on friendship choice. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 12, 1-6.
12.
Duck, S. , & Barnes, M. K. (1992). Disagreeing about agreement: Reconciling differences about similarity. Communications Mono-graphs, 59, 199-208.
13.
Furman, W. , & Childs, M. K. (1981). A temporal perspective on children's friendships. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Boston, MA.
14.
Gottman, J. , & Mettetal, G. (1986). Speculations about social and affective development: Friendship and acquaintanceship through adolescence. In J. Gottman & J. G. Parker (Eds.), Conversations of friends: Speculations on affective development (pp. 192-237). New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Hoyle, R. H. (1993). Interpersonal attraction in the absence of explicit attitudinal information. Social Cognition, 11, 309-320.
16.
Peevers, B. H. , & Secord, P. F. (1973). Developmental changes in attribution of descriptive concepts to persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 120-128.
17.
Rholes, W. S. , & Ruble, D. (1984). Children's understanding of dispositional characteristics of others. Child Development, 55, 550-560.
18.
Rholes, W. S. , & Ruble, D. (1988). Children's impressions of others: The effects of temporal separation of behavioral information. Child Development, 59, 872-878.
19.
Rosenbaum, M. E. (1986a). Comment on a proposed two-stage theory of relationship formation: First repulsion; then attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1171-1172.
20.
Rosenbaum, M. E. (1986b). The repulsion hypothesis: On the nondevelopment of relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1156-1166.
21.
Rosenthal, R. (1966). Experimenter effects in behavioral research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
22.
Singh, R. (1973). Attraction as a function of similarity in attitudes and personality characteristics. Journal of Social Psychology, 91, 87-95.
23.
Singh, R. (1974). Reinforcement and attraction: Specifying the effects of affective states. Journal of Research in Personality, 8, 294-305.
24.
Singh, R. , & Tan, L. S. C. (1992). Attitudes and attraction: A test of the similarity-attraction and dissimilarity-repulsion hypotheses. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 227-238.
25.
Smeaton, G. , Byrne, D., & Murnen, S. K. (1989). The repulsion hypothesis revisited: Similarity irrelevance or dissimilarity bias?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 54-59.
26.
Smeaton, G. , Rupp, D., Vig, C., & Byrne, D. (1993). The mediating role of similarity assumptions on the effects of attitude similarity and dissimilarity on attraction and repulsion. Manuscript submitted for publication.
27.
Tesser, A. (1993). The importance of heritability in psychological research: The case of attitudes. Psychological Review, 100, 129-142.
28.
Youniss, J. , & Volpe, J. (1978). A relational analysis of children's friendships. In W. Damon (Ed.), New directions for child development (Vol. 1, pp. 1-22). San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
