Two studies demonstrate that making a volunteer decision by doing something results in more commitment to it than making the identical decision by doing nothing. Undergraduates were asked to volunteer for a university committee (Study l a) or a sex and AIDS awareness education project (Study 2) and indicated their choice either by affirming it on two items or by skippping two items that affirmed the opposite choice. Subjects who responded actively were more extreme in the degree of their decision than passive respondents. This effect persevered over 6 weeks (Study lb) and had behavioral consequences (Study 2). Attributional analyses in both studies suggest that active and passive choice may result in unique construals of oneself and of the decision: Active agreement results in citing more types of reasons for one's decision, and active refusal heightens one's perceived resistance to social influence.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allgeier, A. , Byrne, D., Brooks, B., & Revnes, D. (1979). The waffle phenomenon: Negative evaluations of those who shift attitudinally. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 9, 170-182.
2.
Allison, S. T. , Mackie, D. M., Muller, M. M., & Worth, L. T. (1993). Sequential correspondence biases and perceptions of change: The Castro studies revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 151-157.
3.
Allison, S. T. , & Messick, D. M. (1988). The feature-positive effect, attitude strength, and degree of perceived consensus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 231-241.
4.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5.
Bargh, J. A. , Chaiken, S., Govender, R., & Pratto, E. (1992). The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 893-912.
6.
Bavelas, A. , Hastorf, A. H., Gross, A. E., & Kite, W. R. (1965). Experiments on the alteration of group structure. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1, 55-70.
7.
Bem, D. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol.6, pp. 1-62). New York: Academic Press.
8.
Brickman, P. (1987). Commitment, conflict, and caring. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9.
Chaiken, S. , & Baldwin, M. W. (1981). Affective-cognitive consistency and the effect of salient behavioral information on the self-perception of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 1-12.
10.
Cialdini, R. (1993). Influence: Science and practice. New York: Harper Collins.
11.
Cioffi, D. (1991). Asymmetry of doubt in medical self-diagnosis: The ambiguity of "uncertain wellness."Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 969-980.
12.
Cioffi, D. (1994). When good news is bad news: Medical wellness as a non-event in undergraduates. Health Psychology, 13, 63-72.
13.
Cioffi, D. , & Garner, R. (1994). Social and self-erceptual contributions to the effect of active vs. passive choice on commitment Unpublished research data, Dartmouth College.
14.
Deutsch, M. , & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636.
15.
Eagly,A. H. , & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Bracejovanovich.
16.
Eagly, A. H. , Chaiken, S., & Wood, W. (1981). An attribution analysis of persuasion. In J. H. Harvey, W.J. Ickes, & R. R Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 3, pp. 37-62). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
Fazio, R. H. (1987). Self-perception theory: A current perspective. In M. P. Zanna,J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Ontario Symposium on Personality and Social Psychology (pp. 129-150). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 75-109). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
19.
Fazio, R. H. , Sherman, S.J., & Herr, P. M. (1982). The feature-positive effectin the self-perception process: Does not doing matter as much as doing?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 404-411.
20.
Fazio, R. H. , Sherman, S.J., & HowellJ. (1985). [The feature-positive effect in observers' attribution of attitudes to actors]. Unpublished data.
21.
Fazio, R. H. , & Zanna, M. P. (1981). Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 161-202). San Diego, CAk Academic Press.
22.
Fiedler, K. , Eckert, C., & Poysiak, C. (1989). Asymmetry in human discrimination learning: Feature positive effect or focus of hypothesis effect?Acta Psychologica, 70, 109-127.
23.
Freedman,J. , & Fraser, S. (1966). Compliance without pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 195-202.
24.
Greenwald, A. F. , Carnot, C. G., Beach, R., & Young, B. (1987). Increasing voting behavior by asking people if they expect to vote. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 315-318.
25.
Hansen, R. D. , & Hall, C. A. (1985). Discounting and augmenting facilitative inhibitory forces: The winner takes almost all. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1482-1493.
26.
Hearst, E. (1989). Addition versus deletion as a signal. Animal Learning and Behavior, 17, 120-133.
27.
Hearst, E. (1991). Psychology and nothing. American Scientist, 79, 432-443.
28.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York:John Wiley.
29.
Higgins, E. T. (1981). The "communication game": Implications for social cognition and persuasion. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Hemman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 1, pp. 343-392). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
Hilton, D.J. , & Jaspars, J.M.F. (1987). The explanation of occurrences and non-occurrences: A test of the inductive logic model of causal attribution. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 189-201.
31.
Howard, D. J. (1990). The influence of verbal responses to common greetings on compliance behavior: The foot-in-the-mouth effectJournal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 1185-1196.
32.
Jenkins, H. , & Sainsbury, R. (1970). Discrimination learning with the distinctive feature on positive and negative trials. In D. Mostofsky (Ed.), Attention: Contemporary theory and analysis (pp. 279-273). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
33.
Jones, E. E. (1990). Constrained behavior and self-concept change. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Self-inference processes: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 6, pp. 69-86). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
Jones, E. E. , & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 219-266). New York: Academic Press.
35.
Jones, E. E. , & Harris, V. A. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 1-24.
36.
Jones, E. E. , & Nisbett, R. E. (1972). The factor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 79-93). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
37.
Kahneman, D. , Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107-128.
39.
Kerr, N. L. , & MacCoun, R.J. (1985). The effects of jurysize and polling method on the process and product of jury deliberation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 349-363.
40.
Kiesler, C. A. (1971). The psychology of commitment: Experiments linking behavior to beliefNew York: Academic Press.
41.
Kiesler, C. A. , & Sakumura, J. (1966). A test of a model for commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 349-353.
42.
Klayman,J. , & Ha, Y. W. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Review, 94, 211-228.
43.
Kraut, R. E. (1973). Effects of social labeling on giving to charity-Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 551-562.
44.
Kuhl,J. (1986). Motivation and information processing: Anew look at decision making, dynamic change, and action control. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 404-434). New York: Guilford.
45.
Leippe, M. R. (1985). The influence of eyewitness nonidentifications on mockjurors' judgements of a court case. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15, 656-672.
46.
Lepper, M. R. (1983). Social-control processes and the internalization of social values: An attributional perspective. In E. T. Higgins, D. N. Ruble, &W. W. Hartup (Eds.), Social cognition and social development (pp. 294-330). New York: Cambridge University Press.
47.
Lydon, J. E. , & Zanna, M. P. (1990). Commitment in the face of adversity. A value-affirmation approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1040-1047.
48.
McCann, C. D. , Higgins, E. T., & Fondacaro, R. A. (1991). Primacy and recency in communication and self-persuasion: How successive audiences and multiple encodings influence subsequent evaluative judgments. Social Cognition, 2, 47-66.
49.
McGuire, W. J. (1964). Inducing resistance to persuasion: Some contemporary approaches. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in eperimental social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 191-229). New York: Academic Press.
50.
McGuire, W.J. (1985). Attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 233-346). New York: Random House.
51.
Nallan, G. B. , Brown, M., Edmonds, C., Gillham, V., Kowalewski, K., & Miller, J. (1981). Transfer effects in feature-positive and feature-negative learning by adults. American Journal of Psychology, 94, 417-429.
52.
Newman, J. , Wolff, W. T., & Hearst, E. (1980). The feature-positive effect in adult human subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 630-650.
53.
Nisbett, R. E. , & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
54.
Olson,J. , & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.). (1990). Self-inference processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
55.
Petty, R. E. , & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). San Diego, CA.: Academic Press.
56.
Quattrone, G. A. (1985). On the congruity between internal states and action. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 340.
57.
Richardson, W. , & Massel, H. (1982). The feature-positive effect in adult humans: Within-group design. American Journal of Psychology, 95, 125-138.
58.
Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 173-220). New York: Academic Press.
59.
Ross, L. , Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The "false consensus effect": An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279-301.
60.
Sainsbury, R. (1973). Discrimination learning utilizing positive or negative cues. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 27, 46-57.
61.
Salinick, G. R. , & Conway, M. (1975). Attitude inferences from salient and relevant cognitive content about behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 829-840.
62.
Schlenker, B. R. (1986). Self-identification: Toward an integration of the private and public self. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Public self and private self (pp. 21-62). New York: Springer-Verlag.
63.
Schlenker, B. R. , Dlugolecki, D. W., & Doherty, K. (1993). The impact of self-presentations on self-appraisals and behavior: The power of public commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 20-33.
64.
Schlenker, B. R. , & Trudeau,J. V. (1990). Impact of self-presentations on private self-beliefs: Effects of prior self-beliefs and misattribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 22-32.
65.
Schlenker, B. R. , & Weigold, M. F. (1990). Self-consciousness and self-presentation: Being autonomous versus appearing autonomous. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 820-828.
66.
Strack, R. , Schwarz, N., & Wanke, M. (1991). Semantic and pragmatic aspects of context effects in social and psychological research. Social Cognition, 2, 111-125.
67.
Taylor, S. E. , & Fiske, S. T. (1978). Salience, attention, and attribution: Top of the head phenomena. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimetal social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 249-288). New York: Academic Press.
68.
Tedeschi,J. , Schlenker, B., & Bonoma,T. (1971). Cognitive dissonance: Private ratiocination or public spectade?American Psychologist, 26, 685-695.
69.
Tice, D. M. (1992). Self-concept change and self-presentation: The looking glass self is also a magnifying glass. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 435-451.
70.
Tversky, A. , & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
71.
Tybout,A. M. , & Scott, GA. (1983). Availability of well-definedinternal knowledge and the attitude formation process: Information aggregation versus self-perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 474-491.
72.
Wells, G. L. , & Lindsay, R. G L. (1980). On estimating the diagnosticity of eyewitness nonidentifications. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 776-784.
73.
Wicklund, R. A. , & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1982). Symbolic self-completionHillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
74.
Wilson, T. D. (1990). Self-persuasion via self-reflection. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Self-inference processes: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 6, pp. 43-68). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
75.
Wood, W. , & Kallgren, C. A. (1988). Communicator attributes and persuasion: Recipients' access to attitude-relevant information in memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 172-182.
