This meta-analysis builds on past qualitative reviews examining different attributions that observers give for other women's and men's successes and failures. Results suggest the greatest support for the argument that differences in expectations for women's and men's performances on masculine tasks influence the selection of stable or unstable causes. However, the results also indicate that the strength of the findings for all but one of the attributions is a function of the lack of independence in measuring the different attributions. The only attribution that is unaffected by this artifact is effort for successes and failures. Suggestions for pursuing new perspectives on the impact of gender on attribution processes are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abelson, R. P. (1985). A variance explanation paradox: When a little is a lot. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 128-132.
2.
Agars, M. D. (1994, March). The cumulative effect of gender stereotypes on selection and promotion decisions. Paper presented at the 15th annual Industrial/Organizational and Organizational Behavior Graduate Student Conference, Chicago, IL.
3.
American Psychological Association (APA) . (1991). In the Supreme Court of the United States: Price Waterhouse v. Ann B. Hopkins: Amicus curiae brief for the American Psychological Association. American Psychologist, 46, 1061-1070.
4.
Aronson, E. , Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. M. (1994). Social psychology: The heart of the mindNew York: HarperCollins College Publishers.
5.
*Bar-Tal, D. , & Frieze, I. H. (1976). Attributions of success and failure for actors and observers. Journal of Research in Personality, 10, 256-265.
6.
Basow, S. A. (1986). Gender stereotypes: Traditions and alternatives (2nd ed.). Monterey, CABrooks/Cole.
7.
Basow, S. A. (1992). Gender: Stereotypes and roles (3rd ed.). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
8.
*Bird, A. M. , & Williams, J. M. (1980). A developmental-attributional analysis of sex role stereotypes for sport performance. Developmental Psychology, 16, 319-322.
9.
*Bond, L. A. , & Deming, S. (1982). Children's causal attributions for performance on sex-stereotypic tasks. Sex Roles, 8, 1197-1208.
10.
*Broctor, E. E (1976). Attributions of another's performance: The effects of sex of stimulus person, sex-linkage of occupation, and sex of competitors (Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University). Dissertation Abstracts International, 37, AAC7707417.
11.
*Campbell, J. A. (1984). Causal attributions for male and female success: Effect of observer, task, and situational characteristics (Doctoral dissertation, University of Louisville). Dissertation Abstracts International; 45, AAC8500643.
12.
*Cann, A. , & Pearce, L. (1980). Attributions for performance on luck and skill tasks: Effects of outcome, sex of performer, and sex of subject. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 231-240.
13.
*Cash, T. F. , Gillen, B., & Burns, D. S. (1977). Sexism and "beautyism" in personnel consultant decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 301-310.
14.
*Cash, T. E. , & Trimer, C. A. (1984). Sexism and beautyism in women's evaluations of peer performance. Sex Roles, 10, 87-98.
15.
Chang, C. C. , Swim, J. K., & Jacobs, R. (1996). Gender and performance appraisals in work setting: A meta-analysis. Manuscript submitted for publication.
16.
Cohen, J. A. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
17.
Corenblum, B. (1977). Effects of race and sex upon the attributions of success and failure. Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 199-207.
18.
Deaux, K. (1976). Sex: A perspective on the attribution process. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1, pp. 335-352). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
Deaux, K. (1984). From individual differences to social categories: Analysis of a decade's research on gender. American Psychologist, 39, 105-116.
20.
*Deaux, K. , & Emswiller, T. (1974). Explanations of successful performance on sex-linked tasks: What is skill for the male is luck for the female. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 80-85.
21.
Deaux, K. , & Lewis, L. L. (1983). Assessment of gender stereotypes: Methodology and components. Psychological Documents, 13, 25. (MS. No. 2583)
22.
*Decker, W. H. (1987). Attributions based on managers' self-presentation, sex, and weightPsychological Reports, 61, 175-181.
23.
*Dovidio,J. F. , Campbell, J. B., & Kahn, S. (1982). Authoritarianism and sex-related attributional biases. Journal of Social Psychology, 118, 199-205.
24.
Doyle, J. A. , & Paludi, M. A. (1991). Sex and gender: The human experience (2nd ed.). Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
25.
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
Eagly, A. H. , Makhjani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1991). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3-22.
27.
Eagly, A. H. , & Mladinic, A. (in press). Are people prejudiced against women? Some answers from research on attitudes, gender stereotypes, and judgments of competence. European Review of Social Psychology.
28.
Eagly, A. , & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735-753.
29.
Eagly, A. H. , & Wood, W. (1982). Inferred sex differences in status as a determinant of gender stereotypes about social influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 915-928.
30.
*Etaugh, C. , & Brown, B. (1975). Perceiving the causes of success and failure of male and female performers. Developmental Psychology, 11, 103.
31.
*Feather, N. T. (1977). Causal attributions for male and female success and failure at occupations differing in perceived status and sex-linked appropriateness. Australian Journal of Psychology, 29, 151-165.
32.
*Feather, N. T. (1978). Reactions to male and female success and failure at sex-linked occupations: Effects of sex and socioeconomic status of respondents. Australian Journal of Psychology, 30, 21-40.
33.
*Feather, N. T. , & Simon, J. G. (1978). Reactions to male and female success and failure in sex-linked occupations: Impressions of personality, causal attributions, and perceived likelihood of different consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 20-31.
34.
*Feige-Mueller, J. (1988). Women in occupational positions of power: Their experience of attribution (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania). Dissertation Abstracts International; 49, AAC8816125.
35.
*Feldman-Summers, S. , & Kiesler, S. B. (1974). Those who are number two try harder: The effect of sex on attributions of causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 846-855.
36.
Frieze, I. H. , Fisher, J., Hanusa, B., McHugh, M. C., & Valle, V. A. (1978). Attributions of the causes of success and failure as internal and external barriers to achievement in women. In J. A. Sherman & F. L. Denmark (Eds.), The psychology of women: Future directions in research. New York: Psychological Dimensions.
37.
Frieze, I. H. , Whitley, B. E., Hanusa, B. H., & McHugh, M. C. (1982). Assessing the theoretical models for sex differences in causal attributions for success and failure. Sex Roles, 8, 333-343.
38.
*Fulks, NJ.K. (1984). Social perceptions of divorced parents: The effects of gender and custodial status (Doctoral dissertation, University of Kentucky). Dissertation Abstracts International, 46, AAC8510727.
39.
Galper, R. E. , & Luck, D. (1980). Gender, evaluation, and causal attribution: The double standard is alive and well. Sex Roles, 6, 273-283.
40.
*Greenhaus, J. H. , & Parasuraman, S. (1993). Job performance attributions and career advancement prospects: An examination of gender and race effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 273-297.
41.
*Haccoun, D. M. , & Stacy, S. (1980). Perceptions of male and female success or failure in relation to spouse encouragement and sex-association of occupation. Sex Roles, 6, 819-831.
42.
Hansen, R. D. , & O'Leary, V. E. (1983). Actresses and actors: The effects of sex on causal attributions. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 4, 209-230.
43.
Hansen, R. D. , & O'Leary, V. E. (1985). Sex-determined attributions. In V. E. O'Leary, R. K. Unger, & B. S. Wallston (Eds.), Women, gender, and social psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44.
Hastie, R. (1984). Causes and effects of causal attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 44-56.
45.
Hedges, L. V. , & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
46.
Heilman, M. E. , & Guzzo, R. A. (1978). The perceived cause of work success as a mediator of sex discrimination in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 21, 347-357.
47.
*Heilman, M. E. , & Stopeck, M. H. (1985). Attractiveness and corporate success: Different attributions for males and females. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 379-388.
48.
*Heimovics, R. D. , & Herman, R. D. (1988). Gender and the attributions of chief executive responsibility for successful or unsuccessful organizational outcomes. Sex Roles, 18, 623-635.
49.
Horner, M. S. (1972). Toward an understanding of achievement-related conflicts in women. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 157-176.
50.
Hyde, J. S. (1991). Half the human experience: The psychology of women (4th ed.). Lexington: D. C. Heath.
51.
*Izraeli, D. N. , Izraeli, D., & Eden, D. (1985). Giving credit where credit is due: A case of no sex bias in attribution. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15, 516-530.
52.
*Jabes, J. (1980). Causal attributions and sex-role stereotypes in the perceptions of women managers. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 12, 52-63.
53.
Jackson, L. A. , Sullivan, L. A., & Hodge, C. N. (1993). Stereotype effects on attributions, predictions, and evaluations: No two social judgments are quite alike. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 69-84.
54.
Johnson, B. T. (1989). DSTAT: Software for the meta-analytic review of research literatures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
55.
*Kaufman, C. G. , & Shikiar, R. (1985). Sex of employee and sex of supervisor: Effect on attributions for the causality of success and failure. Sex Roles, 12, 257-269.
56.
*Kinicki, A. J. , & Griffeth, R. W. (1985). The impact of sex-role stereotypes on performance ratings and causal attributions of performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 27, 155-170.
57.
*Konat, J. R. (1989). Attributions of managerial competence as a function of gender, physical attractiveness, and managerial style (Doctoral dissertation, Depaul University). Dissertation Abstracts International, 50, AAC9001188.
58.
Krueger, J. , & Rothbart, M. (1988). Use of categorical and individuating information in making inferences about personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 187-195.
59.
*Krusell, J. L. (1973). Attribution of responsibility for performance outcomes of males and females (Doctoral dissertation, University of Rochester). Dissertation Abstracts International, 35, AAC7414401.
60.
Kunda, Z. , & Sherman-Williams, B. (1993). Stereotypes and the construal of individuating information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 90-99.
61.
*L'Heureux-Barrett, T. , & Barnes-Farrel, J. L. (1991). Overcoming gender bias in reward allocation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 127-139.
62.
Locksley, A. , Borgida, E., Brekke, N., & Hepburn, C. (1980). Sex stereotypes and social judgmentJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 821-831.
63.
Locksley, A. , Hepburn, C., & Ortiz, V. (1982). Social stereotypes and social judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 23-42.
64.
McGill, A. L. (1993). Selection of a causal background: The role of expectation versus feature mutability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 701-707.
65.
*McManus, M. A. (1985). From gender and occupational stereotypes to organizational rewards: A test of the mediating effect of causal attributions and personality impressions on performance evaluations (Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers, State University of New Jersey). Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, AAC8604841.
66.
*McNeer, A. E. , Hrabowy, I., Johnson, V., & Paludi, M. A. (1984, May). Children's attributions of successful performance on sex-appropriate and sex-inappropriate tasks. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Midwestern Society for Research in Life-Span Development, Akron, OH.
67.
Miller, D. T. , Taylor, B., & Buck, M. L. (1991). Gender gaps: Who needs to be explained?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 5-12.
68.
*Mokros, J. R. , Taylor, R. M., & O'Neill, M. K. (1977). Adolescents' perceptions of the causes and consequences of success in sex-linked occupations. Sex Roles, 3, 353-364.
69.
Nieva, V. F. , & Gutek, B. A. (1980). Sex effects on evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 5, 267-276.
70.
O'Leary, V. E. , & Hansen, R. D. (1983). Performance evaluation: A social-psychological perspective. In F. Landy, S. Zedeck, & J. Cleve-land (Eds.), Performance measurement and theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
71.
O'Leary, V. E. , & Hansen, R. D. (1984). Sex as an attributional fact In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 32, pp. 133-177). Lincoln: University of Nebraska.
72.
*Paludi, M. A. (1984). Impact of androgynous and traditional sex-role orientations on evaluations of successful performance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 8, 370-375.
73.
*Pence, E. C (1980). The perception-attribution process in leadership (Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University). Dissertation Abstracts International, 41, AAC8416460.
74.
*Post, R. D. (1981). Causal explanations of male and female academic performance as a function of sex-role biases. Sex Roles, 7, 691-698.
75.
Prentice, D. A. , & Miller, D. T. (1992). When small effects are impressive. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 160-164.
76.
Rasinski, K. A. , Crocker,J., & Hastie, R. (1985). Another look at sex stereotypes and social judgments: An analysis of the social perceiver's use of subjective probabilities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 317-326.
77.
*Reid, P. T. , Kleiman, L. S., & Travis, C. B. (1986). Attribution and sex differences in the employment interview. Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 205-212.
78.
*Riegelhaupt, B.J. (1984). Discrimination in personnel decisions: The effects of applicant sex and physical attractiveness (Doctoral dissertation,Virginia Polytech Institute and State University). Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, AAC8418224.
79.
*Rose, G. L. (1978). Sex effects on effort attributions in managerial performance evaluation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 367-378.
80.
Ross, M. , & Fletcher, G. J. L. (1985). Attribution and social perception. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., vol. 2, pp. 73-122). New York: Random House.
81.
*Russell, J. E. A. , & Rush, M. C. (1987). The effects of sex and marital/parental status on performance evaluations and attributions. Sex Roles, 17, 221-236.
82.
*Russo, N. F. , Kelly, R. M., & Deacon, M. (1991). Gender and success-related attributions: Beyond individualistic conceptions of achievementSex Roles, 25, 331-350.
83.
Sohn, D. (1982). Sex differences in achievement self-attributions: An effect-size analysis. Sex Roles, 8, 345-358.
84.
*Spencer, B. A. , & Taylor, G. S. (1988). Effects of facial attractiveness and gender on causal attributions of managerial performance. Sex Roles, 19, 273-285.
85.
*Stephenson, B. B. (1981). Sex bias in management evaluation (Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida). Dissertation Abstracts Inter-national, 42, AAC8203724.
86.
*Summers, G. (1984). The effects of age on attributions of causality for success and failure (Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland). Dissertation Abstracts International, 46, AAC8510462.
87.
Swim, J. K. (1994). Perceived versus meta-analytic effect sizes: An assessment of the accuracy of gender stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 21-36.
88.
Swim, J. , Borgida, E., Maruyama, G., & Myers, D. G. (1989). Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations?Psycho-logical Bulletin, 105, 409-429.
89.
*Sylvan, D. L. (1982). The use of sex stereotypes as an information source: An investigation of sex stereotypes as barriers to women in management (Doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University). Dissertation Abstracts International, 44, AAC8324419.
90.
'Taylor, L. , Newman, S., Mangis, C., Swiander, M., Garibaldi, C., Ismael, A., Talmore, D., Tritak, D., & Gittes, M. (1993). Gender and attribution: A reversal of bias?Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 575-577.
91.
*Taynor, J. , & Deaux, K. (1973). When women are more deserving than men: Equity, attribution, and perceived sex differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 360-367.
92.
"Taynor, J. , & Deaux, K. (1975). Equity and perceived sex differences: Role behavior as defined by the task, the mode, and the actor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32381-390.
93.
*Tom, D. , & Cooper, H. (1984, April). Academic attributions for successes and failures among Asian Americans. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
94.
Unger, R. , & Crawford, M. (1992). Women and gender: A feminist psychology,-New York: McGraw-Hill.
95.
VonHippel, W. , Sekaquaptewa, D., & Vargas, P. (1995). On the role of encoding processes in stereotype maintenance. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 27, pp. 177-254). New York: Academic Press.
96.
Wallston, B. S. , & O'Leary, V. E. (1981). Sex makes a difference: Differential perceptions of women and men. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 9-41.
97.
Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548-573.
98.
Weiner, B. , Frieze, I. H., Kukla, A., Reed, L., Rest, S., & Rosenbaum, R. M. (1971). Perceiving the causes of success and failureMorristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
99.
Weiner, B. , Hackhausen, H., Meyer, W. V., & Cook, R. E. (1972). Causal ascription and achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 239-248.
100.
Weiner, B. , & Kukla, A. (1970) An attributional analysis of achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 1-20.
101.
*Weiner, S. , Saxe, L., & Bar-Tal, D. (1975, May). The effects of physical attractiveness on attribution of causality for success and failure Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.
102.
Whitley, B. E. , & Frieze, I. H. (1986). Measuring causal attributions for success and failure: A meta-analysis of the effects of question-wording style. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 35-51.
103.
Whitley, B. E. , McHugh. M. C., & Frieze, I. H. (1986). Assessing the theoretical models for sex differences in causal attributions of success and failure. In J. S. Hyde & M. C. Linn (Eds.), The psychology of gender: Advances through meta-analysis. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
104.
*Wiley, M. G. , & Eskilson,A. (1978). Why did you learn in school today? Teachers' perceptions of causality. Sociology of Education, 51, 261-269.
105.
*Yarkin, K. L. , Town, J. P., & Wallston, B. S. (1982). Blacks and women must try harder: Stimulus person's race and sex attributions of causality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 21-24.
106.
*Yee, D. K. , & Eccles, J. S. (1988). Parent perceptions and attributions for children's math achievement. Sex Roles, 19, 317-333.
