Several lines of experimental research have shown that attributional styles are affected by the attributor's culture, inferential goals, and level of cognitive processing. Can these findings be replicated in natural settings? This study compared the attributions made in two domains (sports articles and editorials) of newspapers published in two culturally distinct countries (Hong Kong and the United States). Consistent with the cross-cultural research, attributions were less dispositional in the East than in the West. This cultural difference was weaker in editorials than in sports articles. The authors argue that the higher level of complexity, accountability, and uncertainty in editorials increased the cognitive effort expended to make attributions, which, in turn, attenuated their extremity. Implications for the mixed model of social inference are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bond, M. (1986). The psychology of the Chinese people. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
Crittendon, K. (1991). Asian self-effacement or feminine modesty? Attributional patterns of women university students in Taiwan. Gender and Society, 5, 98-117.
3.
Fletcher, G. J. O. , & Ward, C. (1988). Attribution theory and processes: A cross-cultural perspective. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The cross-cultural challenge to social psychology. Newbury Park, C.ASage.
4.
Gilbert, D. (1989). Thinking lightly about others: Automatic components of the social inference process. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought: Limits of awareness, intention, and control (pp. 189-212). New York: Guilford.
5.
Gilbert, D. , Krull, D., & Pelham, B. (1988). Of thoughts unspoken: Social inference and the self-regulation of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 685-694.
6.
Gilbert, D. , Pelham, B., & Krull, D. (1988). On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 733-740.
7.
Griffin, D. , Dunning, D., & Ross, L. (1990). The role of construal processes in overconfident predictions about the self and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1128-1139.
8.
Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric measures. New York: McGraw-Hill.
9.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley.
10.
Jones, E. (1979). The rocky road from acts to dispositions. American Psychology, 34, 107-117.
11.
Jones, E. , & Harris, V. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 1-24.
12.
Jones, E. , & Nisbett, R. (1972). The actor and observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In E. E. Jones, D. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
13.
Kelley, H. (1967). Attributional theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 192-238). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
14.
Krull, D. (1993). Does the grist change the mill? The effect of the perceiver's inferential goal on the process of social inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 340-348.
15.
Langer, E. , & Piper, A. (1987). The prevention of mindlessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 280-287.
16.
Lau, R. , & Russell, D. (1980). Attributions in the sports pages: A field test of some current hypotheses in attribution research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 29-38.
17.
Markus, H. , & Kitayama, K. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 90, 224-253.
18.
Miller, J. (1984). Culture and the development of everyday social explanations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 961-978.
19.
Miller, J. (1986). Early cross-cultural commonalities in social explanation. Developmental Psychology, 22, 514-520.
20.
Quattrone, G. (1982). Over attribution and unit formation: When behavior engulfs the person. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42593-607.
21.
Rosenthal, R. , & Rosnow, R. (1985). Contrast analysis: Focused comparisons in the analysis of variance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Rosenthal, R. , & Rosnow, R. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill:
23.
Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 173-220). New York: Academic Press.
24.
Ross, L. , Amabile, T., & Steinmetz, J. (1977). Social roles, social control, and biases in social-perception processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 485-494.
25.
Ross, L. , Lepper, M., & Hubbard, M. (1975). Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: Biased attributional processes in the debriefing paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 817-829.
26.
Schuster, B. , Fosterling, F., & Weiner, B. (1989). Perceiving the causes of success and failure: A cross-cultural explanation of attributional concepts. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 20, 191-213.
27.
Shweder, R. , & Bourne, E. (1984). Does the concept of the person vary cross-culturally? In R. A. Shweder & R. A. LeVine (Eds.), Culture theory: Essays on mind, self and emotion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Smith, S. , & Whitehead, G. (1984). Attributions for promotion and demotion in the United States and India. Journal of Social Psychology, 124, 27-34.
29.
Snyder, M. , & Jones, E. (1974). Attitudes attribution when behavior is constrained. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 585-600.
30.
Tetlock, P. (1985). Accountability: A social check on the fundamental attribution error. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 227-236.
31.
Walker, H. M. , & Lev, J. (1953). Statistical inference. New YorkHolt, Rinehart & Winston.
32.
Weiner, B. (1985). "Spontaneous" causal thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 74-84.
