In line with Susan Fiske and Steven Neuberg's continuum model of impression formation, it was found that when a social category was perceived as homogeneous on a stereotypic trait, a target's behavioral discrepancy from that stereotype elicited attention to and elaboration of individuating information. Individuating information consisted of the target person's attitude toward a stereotype-unrelated issue. Perceived variability was manipulated. Impressions of the stimulus person were related to participants'own attitude toward the issue, suggesting a similarity attraction effect. In the atypical-behavior/low-variability condition, this relationship was mediated by attitude-related thoughts. This suggests a cognitive-response-mediated similarity-attraction effect leading to relatively individuated impressions. All results were consistent across two different stimulus groups that were associated with complementary stereotypes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abelson, R. P. , & Prentice, D. A. (1989). Beliefs as possessions: A functional perspective. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
Anderson, N. H. (1981). Averaging versus adding as a stimulus-combination rule in impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 394-400.
3.
Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258-290.
4.
Baker, S. M. , & Petty, R. E. (1994). Majority and minority influence: Source-position imbalance as a determinant of message scrutiny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 5-19.
5.
Bargh, J. A. , & Thein, R. D. (1985). Individual construct accessibility, person memory, and the recall-judgment link: The case of information overload. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1129-1146.
6.
Baron, R. M. , & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistic considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
7.
Berscheid, E. (1985). Interpersonal attraction. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., vol. 2). New York: Random House.
8.
Byrne, D. E. (1961). Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 713-715.
9.
Byrne, D. E. (1971). The attraction paradigm. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
10.
Cacioppo, J. T. , & Petty, R. E. (1981). Social psychological procedures for cognitive response assessment: The thought listing technique. In T. V. Merluzzi, C. R. Glass, & M. Genest (Eds.), Cognitive assessment. New York: Guilford.
11.
Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766.
12.
Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario Symposium (vol. 5). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
Clore, G. L. , & Byrne, D. E. (1974). A reinforcement-affect model of attraction. In T. L. Huston (Ed.), Foundations of interpersonal attraction. New York: Academic Press.
14.
Duck, S. W. (1973). Personal relationships and personal constructs: A study of friendship formation. London: Wiley.
15.
Erber, R. , & Fiske, S. T. (1984). Outcome dependency and attention to inconsistent information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 709-726.
16.
Fiske, S. T. (1993). Social cognition and social perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 155-194.
17.
Fiske, S. T. , & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
18.
Fiske, S. T. , Neuberg, S. L., Beattie, A. E., & Milberg, S. J. (1987). Category-based and attribute-based reactions to others: Some informational conditions of stereotyping and individuating processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 399-427.
19.
Fiske, S. T. , & Pavelchak, M. A. (1986). Category-based versus piecemeal-based affective responses: Developments in schema-triggered affect. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior. New York: Guilford.
20.
Fiske, S. T. , & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
21.
Goodstein, R. C. (1993). Category-based applications and extensions in advertising: Motivating more extensive ad processing. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 87-99.
22.
Hastie, R. (1984). Causes and effects of causal attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 44-56.
23.
Hastie, R. , & Kumar, P. A. (1979). Person memory: Personality traits as organizing principles in memory for behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 25-38.
24.
Herek, G. M. (1986). The instrumentality of attitudes: Toward a neo-functional theory. Journal of Social Issues, 42(2), 99-114.
25.
Hoffman, C. , & Hurst, N. (1990). Gender stereotypes: Perception or rationalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 197-208.
26.
Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 163-204.
27.
Kinder, D. R. , & Sears, D. O. (1981). Prejudice and politics: Symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 414-431.
28.
Kraus, S. , Ryan, C. S., Judd, C. M., Hastie, R., & Park, B. (1993). Use of mental frequency distributions to represent variability among members of social categories. Social Cognition, 11, 22-43.
29.
Mackie, D. M. (1987). Systematic and nonsystematic processing of majority and minority persuasive communications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 41-52.
30.
Mackie, D. M. , Worth, L., & Asuncion, A. G. (1990). Processing of persuasive in-group messages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 812-822.
31.
Macrae, C. N. , Hewstone, M., & Griffiths, R. J. (1993). Processing load and memory for stereotype-based information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 77-87.
32.
Macrae, C. N. , Shepherd, J. W., & Milne, A. B. (1992). The effects of source credibility on the dilution of stereotype-based judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 765-775.
33.
Maheswaran, D. , & Chaiken, S. (1991). Promoting systematic processing in low-motivation settings: Effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 13-25.
34.
Messick, D. M. , & Mackie, D. M. (1989). Intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 45-81.
35.
Newcomb, T. M. (1956). The prediction of interpersonal attraction. American Psychologist, 11, 575-586.
36.
Ozanne, J. L. , Brucks, M., & Grewal, D. (1992). A study of information search behavior during the categorization of new products. Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 452-463.
37.
Park, B. , Judd, C. M., & Ryan, C. S. (1991). Social categorization and the representation of variability information. European Review of Social Psychology, 2, 211-245.
38.
Park, B. , Ryan, C., & Judd, C. M. (1992). Role of meaningful subgroups in explaining differences in perceived variability for in-groups and out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 553-567.
39.
Petty, R. E. , & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion, central and peripheral routes to attitude changeNew York: Springer-Verlag.
40.
Petty, R. E. , Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 135-146.
41.
Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510-532.
42.
Rojahn, K. , & Pettigrew, T. F. (1992). Memory for schema-relevant information: A meta-analytic resolution. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 81-109.
43.
Sedikides, C. , & Ostrom, T. M. (1993). Perceptions of group variability: Moving from an uncertain crawl to a purposeful stride. Social Cognition, 11, 165-174.
44.
Srull, T. K. (1981). Person memory: Some tests of associative storage and retrieval models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 440-463.
45.
Srull, T. K. , Lichtenstein, M., & Rothbart, M. (1985). Associative storage and retrieval processes in person memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 316-345.
46.
Srull, T. K. , & Wyer, R. S. (1989). Person memory and judgments. Psychological Review, 96, 58-83.
47.
Stangor, C. , & Duan, C. (1991). Effects of multiple task demands upon memory for information about social groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 357-378.
48.
Stangor, C. , & McMillan, D. (1992). Memory for expectancy-congruent and expectancy-incongruent information: A review of the social and social developmental literatures. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 42-61.
49.
Stern, L. D. , Marrs, S., Millar, M. G., & Cole, E. (1984). Processing time and the recall of inconsistent and consistent behaviors of individuals and groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 253-262.
50.
Sujan, M. (1985). Consumer knowledge: Effects on evaluation strategies mediating consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 31-46.
51.
Tetlock, P. E. (1986). A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 819-827.
52.
van Knippenberg, D. , & Wilke, H. (1992). Prototypicality of arguments and conformity to ingroup norms. European Journal of Social Psychology22, 141-155.
53.
Vonk, R. (1994). Trait inferences, impression formation, and person memory: Strategies in processing inconsistent information about persons. European Review of Social Psychology, 5, 111-149.
54.
Woll, S. , & Graesser, A. (1982). Memory discrimination for information typical or atypical of person schemata. Social Cognition, 1, 287-310.
