The Effects of Time Pressure and Task Differences on Influence Modes and Accuracy in Decision-Making Groups

Abstract

This study explores the effects of time pressure and task differences on group decision accuracy and on the emergence and effectiveness of normative and informational influence. Three person groups completed one of two ranking tasks under high or low-time-pressure conditions. Although both were intellective, one task was perceived by subjects as judgmental, and one was perceived as intellective. Group discussions were coded for statements reflecting normative influence, informational influence, or other processes. In general, normative influence emerged and was more effective for groups working under time pressure. Informational influence emerged and was more effective for groups working on an intellective task and for groups working under low time pressure. Accuracy of the solution was related to amount of information influence used and was greater for groups working on the intellective task. Results were consistent with Kaplan's model of group influence processes and Karau and Kelly's attentional focus model.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson, L. R. , & Ager, J. W. (1978). Analysis of variance in small group research. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 341-345.

Brown, R. (1965). Social psychology. New York: Free Press.

Burnstein, E. , & Santis, K. (1981). Attitude polarization in groups. In R. E. Petty , T. M. Ostrom , & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Family, socialization, and interaction process (pp. 259-306). New York: Free Press.

Burnstein, E. , & Vinokur, A. (1973). Testing two classes of theories about group-induced shifts in individual choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 123-137.

Burnstein, E. , & Vinokur, A. (1975). What a person thinks upon learning he has chosen differently from others: Nice evidence for the persuasive arguments explanation of choice shifts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 412-426.

Deutsch, M. , & Gerard, H. G. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636.

Griffith, R. M. , Miyago, M. , & Tago, A. (1958). The universality of typical dreams: Japanese vs. Americans. American Anthropologist, 60, 1173-1179.

Heaton, A. W. , & Kruglanski, A. W. (1991). Person perception by introverts and extraverts under time pressure: Effects of need for closure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 161-165.

Isenberg, D. J. (1986). Group polarization: A critical review and metaanalysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1141-1151.

10.

Kaplan, M. F. (1987). The influencing process in group decision seeking. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Vol. 8. Group processes (pp. 189-212). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

11.

Kaplan, M. F. (1989). Task, situational, and personal determinants of influence processes in group decision making. In E. Lawler & B. Markovsky (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 6, pp. 87-105). Greenwich, CT:JAI.

12.

Kaplan, M. F. , & Jendrek, M. P. (1992, March). Induced verdict- and evidence driven deliberation styles affect extent but not form of influence in mock juries. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society, San Diego, CA.

13.

Kaplan, M. F. , & Miller, C. E. (1987). Group decision seeking and normative vs. informational influence: Effects of type of issue and decision rule. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 306-313.

14.

Karau, S. J. , & Kelly, J. R. (1992). The effects of time scarcity and time abundance on group performance quality and interaction process. Journal of Exe7imental Social Psychology, 28, 542-571.

15.

Kruglanski, A. W. (1990). Motivations for judging and knowing: Implications for causal attribution. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 333-369). New York: Guilford.

16.

Kruglanski, A. W. , & Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 448-468.

17.

Lamm, H. , & Myers, D. G. (1978). Group-induced polarization of attitudes and behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 145-195). New York: Academic Press.

18.

Laughlin, P. R. (1980). Social combination processes of cooperative, problem-solving groups at verbal, intellective tasks. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Progress in social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 127-155). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

19.

National Center for Health Statistics . (1991). Vital statistics of the United States, 1988: Vol. 2. Mortality, Part A. Washington, DC: Public Health Service.

20.

Rugs, D. , & Kaplan, M. F. (1993). Effectiveness of informational and normative influences in group decision making depends on the group interactive goal. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 147-158.

21.

Sanders, G. S. , & Baron, R. S. (1977). Is social comparison irrelevant for producing choice shifts? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 303-314.

22.

Sherif, M. (1936). 77Te psychology of social norms. New York: Harper & Row.