This study illuminates how social reality affects in-group favoritism in group perceptions. Members of two student associations (which were expected to have differential status) as well as nonmembers participated in this study (total N = 103). Participants rated the perceived status of the two groups and indicated to what extent they identified with each group. They also rated the two groups on typical and nontypical traits and evaluated these traits. In support of predictions, members of the group with lower perceived status displayed more in-group-favoring biases than members of the group with higher perceived status. However, biased ratings did not violate consensual definitions of social reality as indicated by nonmembers. The observed biases correlated substantially with participants' group identifications.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Branscombe, N. R. , & Wann, D. L. (1994). Collective self-esteem consequences of outgroup derogation when a valued social identity is on trial. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 641-658.
2.
Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324.
3.
Brown, J. D. , Collins, R. L., & Schmidt, G. W. (1988). Self-esteem and direct versus indirect forms of self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 445-453.
4.
Doosje, E. J. , & Ellemers, N. (1997). Stereotyping under threat: The role of group identification. In R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 257-272). Oxford, UKBasil Blackwell.
5.
Doosje, B. , Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 410-436.
6.
Ellemers, N. (1993). The influence of socio-structural variables on identity enhancement strategies. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 27-57.
7.
Ellemers, N. , & Van Knippenberg, A. (1997). Stereotyping in social context. In R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 208-235). Oxford, UKBasil Blackwell.
8.
Ellemers, N. , Van Knippenberg, A., de Vries, N., & Wilke, H. (1988). Social identification and permeability of group boundaries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 497-513.
9.
Ellemers, N. , Wilke, H., & Van Knippenberg, A. (1993). Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective identity enhancement strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 766-778.
10.
Goethals, G. R. , Messick, D. M., & Allison, S. T. (1991). The uniqueness bias: Studies of constructive social comparison. In J. Suls & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 149-176). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Grant, P. (1993). Ethnocentrism in response to a threat to social identity. Journal of Social Behaviour and Personality, 8, 143-154.
12.
Hinkle, S. , & Brown, R. J. (1990). Intergroup comparisons and social identity: Some links and lacunae. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 48-70). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
13.
Hinkle, S. , & Schopler, J. (1979). Ethnocentrism in the evaluation of group products. In W. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 160-173). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
14.
Judd, C. M. , & Park, B. (1993). Definition and assessment of accuracy in social stereotypes. Psychological Review, 100, 109-128.
15.
Luhtanen, R. , & Crocker, J. (1991). Self-esteem and intergroup comparisons: Toward a theory of collective self-esteem. In J. Suls & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 211-234). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Maass, A. , & Schaller, M. (1991). Intergroup biases and the cognitive dynamics of stereotype formation. European Review of Social Psychology, 2, 189-209.
17.
Messick, D. M. , & Mackie, D. (1989). Intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 45-81.
18.
Mlicki, P. P. , & Ellemers, N. (1996). Being different or being better? National stereotypes and identifications of Polish and Dutch students. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 97-114.
19.
Mummendey, A. , & Schreiber, H. J. (1983). Better or different? Positive social identity by discrimination against or differentiation from outgroups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 389-397.
20.
Mummendey, A. , & Schreiber, H. J. (1984). "Different" just means "better": Some obvious and some hidden pathways to in-group favouritism. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 363-368.
21.
Mummendey, A. , & Simon, B. (1989). Better or different? III: The impact of importance of comparison dimension and relative in-group size upon intergroup discrimination. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 1-16.
22.
Oakes, P. J. , & Reynolds, K. J. (1997). Asking the accuracy question: Is measurement the answer? In R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 51-71). Oxford, UKBasil Blackwell.
23.
Sachdev, I. , & Bourhis, R. Y. (1985). Social categorization and power differentials in group relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 415-434.
24.
Sachdev, I. , & Bourhis, R. Y. (1987). Status differentials and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 277-293.
25.
Sachdev, I. , & Bourhis, R. Y. (1991). Power and status differentials in minority and majority group relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 1-24.
26.
Shrauger, J. S. (1975). Responses to evaluation as a function of initial self-perceptions. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 581-596.
27.
Simon, B. (1992). Intragroup differentiation in terms of ingroup and outgroup attributes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 407-413.
28.
Spears, R. , & Manstead, A. S. R. (1989). The social context of stereotyping and differentiation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 101-121.
29.
Swann, W. B., Jr. , Griffin, J. J., Jr., Predmore, S. C., & Gaines, B. (1987). The cognitive-affective crossfire: When self-consistency confronts self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52881-889.
30.
Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity and social comparison. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 61-76). London: Academic Press.
31.
Tajfel, H. , & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of social conflict. In W. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intrgroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
32.
Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social-cognitive theory of group behavior. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes: Theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 77-122). Greenwich, CT:JAI.
33.
Turner, J. C. , Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
34.
Van Knippenberg, A. (1978). Status differences, comparative relevance and intergroup differentiation. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 171-199). London: Academic Press.
35.
Van Knippenberg, A. (1984). Intergroup differences in group perceptions. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), The social dimension: European developments in social psychology (pp. 560-578). Cambridge, UK-Cambridge University Press.
36.
Van Knippenberg, A. , & Ellemers, N. (1990). Social identity and inter-group differentiation processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 1, 137-169.
37.
Van Knippenberg, A. , & Van Oers, H. (1984). Social identity and equity concerns in intergroup perceptions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 351-361.
38.
Van Knippenberg, A. , & Wilke, H. (1979). Perceptions of collégiens and apprentis re-analyzed. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 427-434.
