The five-factor model (FFM) of personality is implicit in lay conceptions of personality; this research sought to examine laypersons' explicit grasp of the model. In one study, undergraduates (N = 233) were given definitions of the five factors and asked to identify adjectives known to be associated with each. In a second study, the rated diagnosticity of behaviors in three contexts was compared with their actual correlation with self-reported and acquaintance-rated personality factors. In the final study, undergraduates (N= 76) grouped 30 adjectives into clusters of traits. Results suggest that most laypersons can easily grasp the nature of the factors and their behavioral manifestations and can spontaneously recognize their grouping when provided with clear exemplars.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Blackman, M. C. , & Funder, D. C. (1996). Self-esteem as viewed from the outside: A peer and gender perspective. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 115-126.
2.
Block, J. (1978). The Q-sort method in personality assessment and psychiatric research. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists. (Original work published 1961)
3.
Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187-215.
4.
Borkenau, P. (1992). Implicit personality theory and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 60, 295-327.
5.
Costa, P. T. Jr. , & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO Personality Inventory manualOdessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
6.
Costa, P. T. Jr. , & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manualOdessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
7.
D'Andrade, R. G. (1965). Trait psychology and componential analysis. American Anthropologist, 67, 215-228.
8.
De Raad, B. , & Van Heck, G. L. (1994). The fifth of the Big Five [Special issue]. European Journal of Personality, 8(4).
9.
Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
10.
Funder, D. C. , & Colvin, C. R. (1991). Explorations in behavioral consistency: Properties of persons, situations, and behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 773-794.
11.
Funder, D. C. , Kolar, D. C., & Blackman, M. C. (1995). Agreement among judges of personality: Interpersonal relations, similarity, and acquaintanceship. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 69, 656-672.
12.
Funder, D. C. , & Sneed, C. D. (1993). Behavioral manifestations of personality: An ecological approach to judgmental accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 470-490.
13.
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative "description of personality": the Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality &Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.
14.
Gough, H. G. , & Heilbrun, A. B. Jr. (1983). Adjective Check List manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist.
15.
Hakel, M. D. (1969). Significance of personality theories for personality research and theory. Proceedings of the 77th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 4, 403-406.
16.
John, O. P. (1989). Towards a taxonomy of personality descriptors. In D. M. Buss & N. Cantor (Eds.), Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions (pp. 261-271). New York: Springer-Verlag.
17.
McCrae, R. R. (1989). Why I advocate the five-factor model: Joint analysis of the NEO-PI and other instruments. In D. M. Buss & N. Cantor (Eds.), Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions (pp. 237-245). New York: Springer-Verlag.
18.
McCrae, R. R. (1993-1994). Openness to experience as a basic dimension of personality. Imagination, Cognition & Personality, 13, 39-55.
19.
McCrae, R. R. , & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1985). Openness to experience. In R. Hogan & W. H. Jones (Eds.), Perspectives in personality (Vol. 1, pp. 145-172). Greenwich, CT:JAI.
20.
McCrae, R. R. , & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1995a). Positive and negative valence within the five-factor model. Journal ()f Research in Personality, 29, 443-460.
21.
McCrae, R. R. , & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1995b). Trait explanations in personality psychology. European Journal of Personality, 9, 231-252.
22.
McCrae, R. R. , & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 51-87). New York: Guilford.
23.
McCrae, R. R. , & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175-215.
24.
Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward and adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574-583.
25.
Passini, F. T. , & Norman, W. T. (1966). A universal conception of personality structure?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 44-49.
26.
Peabody, D. (1989, June). Internal structure: The perceived relation among traits. Paper presented at the First International Workshop on Personality Language, Groningen, the Netherlands.
27.
Saucier, G. (1992). Openness versus intellect: Much ado about nothing?European Journal of Personality, 6, 381-386.
28.
Schiller, R. , Tellegen, A., & Evens, J. (1995). An idiographic and nomothetic study of personality description. In J. N. Butcher & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 10, pp. 1-23). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
Shweder, R. A. , & D'Andrade, R. G. (1980). The systematic distortion hypothesis. New Directions for Methodology (of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 4, 37-58.
30.
Wrigley, C. S. , & Neuhaus, J. O. (1955). The matching of two sets of factors. American Psychologist, 10, 418-419.
