The personal/group discrimination discrepancy (PGDD) refers to the tendency of disadvantaged group members to report higher levels of discrimination against their group in general than against themselves personally as members of that group. In two studies, the authors examined the cognitive mechanisms that underlie the PGDD. In Experiment 1, the authors demonstrated that the PGDD emerges from a divergence in the comparison standards on which personal and group judgments are made and that specifying that the same standards be used for both types of judgments eliminates or reduces the PGDD. In Experiment 2, the authors demonstrated that the magnitude of the PGDD was a function of the degree of informational complexity in the comparison targets. Implications for conceptualizations of the PGDD are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alicke, M. D. , Klotz, M. L., Breitenbecher, D. L., Yurak, T. J., & Vredenburg, D. S. (1995). Personal contact, individuation, and the better-than-average effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 804-825.
2.
Crocker, J. , & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608-630.
3.
Crosby, F. (1982). Relative deprivation and working women. New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
Crosby, F. (1984). The denial of personal discrimination. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 371-386.
5.
Crosby, F. , Clayton, S., Alksnis, O., & Hemker, K. (1986). Cognitive biases in the perception of discrimination: The importance of format. Sex Roles, 14(11/12), 637-646.
6.
Crosby, F. , Pufall, A., Snyder, R. C., O’Connell, M., & Whalen, P. (1989). The denial of personal disadvantage among you, me, and all the other ostriches. In M. Crawford & M. Gentry (Eds.), Gender and thought: Psychological perspectives (pp. 79-99). New York: Springer-Verlag.
7.
Dion, K. L. (1986). Responses to perceived discrimination and relative deprivation. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Relative deprivation and social comparison: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 4, pp. 159-179). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Dion, K. L. , & Kawakami, K. (1996). Ethnicity and perceived discrimination in Toronto: Another perspective on the personal/group discrimination discrepancy. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 28, 203-213.
9.
Dubé, L. , & Guimond, S. (1986). Relative deprivation and social protest: The personal-group issue. In J. M. Olson, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Relative deprivation and social comparison: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 4, pp. 201-216). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Hoorens, V. (1993). Self-enhancement and superiority biases in social comparison. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 113-139). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
11.
Major, B. , & Forcey, B. (1985). Social comparisons and pay evaluations: Preferences for same-sex and same-job wage comparisons. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 393-405.
12.
Martin, J. (1986). The tolerance of injustice. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Relative deprivation and social comparison: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 4, pp. 217-242). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
Moghaddam, F. M. , Stolkin, A. J., & Hutcheson, L. S. (1997). A generalized personal/group discrepancy: Testing the domain specificity of a perceived higher effect of event on one’s group than on oneself. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 743-750.
14.
Olson, J. M. , & Hafer, C. L. (1996). Affect, motivation, and cognition in relative deprivation research. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: The interpersonal context (Vol. 3). New York: Guilford.
15.
Olson, J. M. , Roese, N. J., Meen, J., & Robertson, D. J. (1995). The preconditions and consequences of relative deprivation: Two field studies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 944-964.
16.
Perloff, L. S. , & Fetzer, B. K. (1986). Self-other judgments and perceived vulnerability to victimization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 502-510.
17.
Ruggiero, K. M. , & Taylor, D. M. (1995). Coping with discrimination: How disadvantaged group members perceive the discrimination that confronts them. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 826-838.
18.
Ruggiero, K. M. , & Taylor, D. M. (1997). Why minority group members perceive or do not perceive the discrimination that confronts them: The role of self-esteem and perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 373-389.
19.
Rutte, C. G. , Diekmann, K. A., Polzer, J. T., Crosby, F. J., & Messick, D. M. (1994). Organization of information and the detection of gender discrimination. Psychological Science, 5, 226-231.
20.
Smith, E. R. , & Henry, S. (1996). An in-group becomes part of the self: Response-time evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 635-642.
21.
Taylor, D. M. , & Dubé, L. (1986). Two faces of identity: The “I” and the “we.”Journal of Social Issues, 72, 81-98.
22.
Taylor, D. M. , Ruggiero, K. M., & Louis, W. R. (1996). Personal/group discrimination discrepancy: Towards a two-factor explanation. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 28, 193-202.
23.
Taylor, D. M. , Wong-Rieger, D., McKirnan, D. J., & Bercusson, T. (1982). Social comparison in a group context. Journal of Social Psychology, 117, 257-269.
24.
Taylor, D. M. , Wright, S. C., Moghaddam, F. M., & Lalonde, R. N. (1990). The personal/group discrimination discrepancy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 254-262.
25.
Taylor, D. M. , Wright, S. C., & Porter, L. E. (1994). Dimensions of perceived discrimination: The personal/group discrimination discrepancy. In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 7). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
Weinstein, N. D. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 806-820.
27.
Zanna, M. P. , Crosby, F., & Lowenstein, G. (1986). Male reference groups and discontent among female professionals. In B. A. Gutek & L. Larwood (Eds.), Women’s career development (pp. 28-41). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
