Kernel-Smoothing Estimation of Item Characteristic Functions for Continuous Personality Items: An Empirical Comparison with the Linear and the Continuous-Response Models
Restricted accessOtherFirst published online March, 2004
Kernel-Smoothing Estimation of Item Characteristic Functions for Continuous Personality Items: An Empirical Comparison with the Linear and the Continuous-Response Models
This study used kernel-smoothing procedures to estimate the item characteristic functions (ICFs) of a set of continuous personality items. The nonparametric ICFs were compared with the ICFs estimated (a) by the linear model and (b) by Samejima’s continuous-response model. The study was based on a conditioned approach and used an error-in-variables kernel model. The assumptions of the model were approximately correct in the present conditions. The results obtained with the kernel procedure suggested that (a) the ICFs of these items were essentially sigmoid curves, as is usually assumed in parametric item response theory, and (b) for most of the items, these curves were well approximated by both the linear and the continuous-response model.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bejar, I. I. (1977). An application of the continuous response level model to personality measurement. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 509-521.
2.
Cook, C., Heath, F., & Thompson, B. (2001). Score reliability in Web-or-Internet-based surveys: Unnumbered graphic rating scales versus Likert-type scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 697-706.
3.
Douglas, J. (1997). Joint consistency of nonparametric item characteristic curve and ability estimation. Psychometrika, 62, 7-28.
4.
Douglas, J.,& Cohen, A. (2001). Nonparametric item response function estimation for assessing parametric model fit. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 234-243.
5.
Eysenck, H. J. (1952). The scientific study of personality. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
6.
Eysenck, H. J. (1981). Amodel for personality. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
7.
Fan, J., & Truong, Y. K. (1993). Nonparametric regression with errors in variables. Annals of Statistics, 21, 1900-1925.
8.
Ferrando, P. J. (1994). Fitting item response models to the EPI-A impulsivity subscale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 118-127.
9.
Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2001). Checking the appropriateness of item response theory models by predicting the distribution of observed 108 scores: The program EO-Fit. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 895-902.
10.
Finch, J. F., & West, S. G. (1997). The investigation of personality structure: Statistical models. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 439-485.
11.
Fraser, C., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). NOHARM: Least squares item factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 267-269.
12.
Fuller, W. A. (1987). Measurement error models. New York: John Wiley.
13.
Goldstein, H., & Wood, R. (1989). Five decades of item response modelling. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 42, 139-167.
14.
Hambleton, R. K., & Traub, R. E. (1973). Analysis of empirical data using two logistic latent trait models. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 26, 195-211.
15.
Härdle, W. (1990). Applied nonparametric regression. London: Chapman & Hall.
16.
Hastie, T. J., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1990). Generalized additive models. London: Chapman & Hall.
17.
Junker, B. W., & Sijtsma, K. (2001). Nonparametric item response theory in action: An overview of the special issue. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 211-220.
18.
Kingston, N. M., & Dorans, N. J. (1985). The analysis of item-ability regressions: An exploratory IRT model fit tool. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 281-288.
19.
Lord, F. M. (1953). The relation of test score to the trait underlying the test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 13, 517-548.
20.
Lord, F. M. (1970). Item characteristic curves estimated without knowledge of their mathematical form: A confrontation of Birnbaum’s logistic model. Psychometrika, 35, 43-50.
21.
Lord, F. M. (1977). Practical applications of item characteristic curve theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 14, 117-138.
22.
Lord, F. M. (1983). Unbiased estimators of ability parameters, of their variance, and of their parallelforms reliability. Psychometrika, 48, 233-245.
23.
Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
24.
Mellenbergh, G. J. (1994). A unidimensional latent trait model for continuous item responses. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29(3), 223-237.
25.
Mislevy, R. J. (1984). Estimating latent distributions. Psychometrika, 49, 359-381.
26.
Mislevy, R. J., & Bock, R. D. (1990). BILOG 3 Item analysis and test scoring with binary logistic models. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
27.
Müller, H. (1987). A Rasch model for continuous ratings. Psychometrika, 52, 165-181.
28.
Muthén, B. (1989). Tobit factor analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 42, 241-250.
29.
Nadaraya, E. A. (1964). On estimating regression. Probability Theory and Its Applications, 9, 141-142.
30.
Ramsay, J. O. (1991). Kernel smoothing approaches to nonparametric item characteristic curve estimation. Psychometrika, 56, 611-630.
31.
Ramsay, J. O. (2000). TESTGRAF: A program for the graphical analysis of multiple choice test and questionnaire data[Computer program]. Montreal: McGill University.
32.
Ramsay, J. O., & Silverman, B. (1997). Functional data analysis. New York: Springer.
33.
Reise, S. P. (1999). Personality measurement issues viewed through the eyes of IRT. In S. E. Embretson & S. L. Hershberger (Eds.), The new rules of measurement(pp. 219-241). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
Reise, S. P., & Waller, N. G. (1990). Fitting the two-parameter model to personality data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 45-58.
35.
Samejima, F. (1973). Homogeneous case of the continuous response model. Psychometrika, 38(2), 203-219.
36.
Samejima, F. (1974). Normal ogive model on the continuous response level in the multidimensional latent space. Psychometrika, 39, 111-121.
37.
Samejima, F. (1977). A method of estimating item characteristic functions using the maximum likelihood estimate of ability. Psychometrika, 42, 163-191.
38.
Samejima, F. (1993). The bias function of the maximumlikelihood estimate of ability for the dichotomous response level. Psychometrika, 58, 195-209.
39.
Samejima, F. (1994). Nonparametric estimation of the plausibility functions of the distractors of vocabulary test items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18, 35-51.
40.
Samejima, F. (1998). Efficient nonparametric approaches for estimating the operating characteristics of discrete item responses. Psychometrika, 63, 111-130.
41.
Silverman, B. W. (1986). Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. London: Chapman & Hall.
42.
Steinberg, L., & Thissen, D. (1995). Item response theory in personality research. In P. E. Shrout & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Personality research, methods and theory: Afestschrift honoring Donald W. Fiske (pp. 161-181). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43.
Tanaka, J. S., & Huba, G. J. (1985). A fit index for covariance structure models under arbitrary GLS estimation. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 197-201.
44.
Thissen, D., Steinberg, L., Pyszczynski, T., & Greenberg, J. (1983). An item response theory for personality and attitude scales: Using restricted factor analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7(2), 211-226.
45.
Waller, N. G., Tellegen, A., McDonald, R. P., & Lykken, D. T. (1996). Exploring nonlinear models in personality assessment: Development and validation of a negative emotionality scale. Journal of Personality, 64, 545-576.
46.
Wang, T., & Zeng, L. (1998). Item parameter estimation for a continuous item response model using an EM algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 333-344.
47.
Watson, G. S. (1964). Smooth regression analysis. Sankhya, 26, 359-372.
