Abstract
A common problem when using a variety of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for diverse populations and subgroups is establishing a harmonized scale for the incommensurate outcomes. The lack of comparability in metrics (e.g., raw summed scores vs. scaled scores) among different PROs poses practical challenges in studies comparing effects across studies and samples. Linking has long been used for practical benefit in educational testing. Applying various linking techniques to PRO data has a relatively short history; however, in recent years, there has been a surge of published studies on linking PROs and other health outcomes, owing in part to concerted efforts such as the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) project and the PRO Rosetta Stone (PROsetta Stone®) project (www.prosettastone.org). Many R packages have been developed for linking in educational settings; however, they are not tailored for linking PROs where harmonization of data across clinical studies or settings serves as the main objective. We created the
The
The package includes a data loading function,
The
Development of the
Supplemental Material
sj-Rmd-1-apm-10.1177_01466216211013106 – Supplemental material for PROsetta: An R Package for Linking Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
Supplemental material, sj-Rmd-1-apm-10.1177_01466216211013106 for PROsetta: An R Package for Linking Patient-Reported Outcome Measures by S. W. Choi, S. Lim, B. D. Schalet, A. J. Kaat and D. Cella in Applied Psychological Measurement
Supplemental Material
sj-zip-2-apm-10.1177_01466216211013106 – Supplemental material for PROsetta: An R Package for Linking Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
Supplemental material, sj-zip-2-apm-10.1177_01466216211013106 for PROsetta: An R Package for Linking Patient-Reported Outcome Measures by S. W. Choi, S. Lim, B. D. Schalet, A. J. Kaat and D. Cella in Applied Psychological Measurement
Footnotes
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
