Bock, R.D., & Lieberman, M. (1970). Fitting a response model for n dichotomously scored items. Psychometrika, 35, 179-197.
2.
Drasgow, F. (in preparation). An evaluation of marginal maximum likelihood estimation for the two-parameter logistic model. Champaign IL: University of Illinois, Department of Psychology.
3.
Hambleton, R.K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory: Principles and applications (pp. 127-129). Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
Lord, F.M. (1968). An analysis of the Verbal Scholastic Aptitude Test using Bimbaum's three-parameter logistic model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 28, 989-1020.
6.
Lord, F.M. (1977). A study of item bias, using item characteristic curve theory. In Y. H. Portinga (Ed.), Basic problems in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 19-29). Amsterdam : Swets and Zeitlinger.
7.
Lord, F.M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems (pp. 181-223). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
Massey, F.J., Jr. (1951). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for goodness of fit. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 46, 68-78.
9.
Neyman, J., & Scott, E.L. (1948). Consistent estimates based on partially consistent observations. Econometrica, 16, 1-32.
10.
Shepard, L., Camilli, G., & Williams, D.M. (1984). Accounting for statistical artifacts in item bias research. Journal of Educational Statistics , 9, 93-128.
11.
Wingersky, M.S., & Lord, F.M. (1984). An investigation of methods for reducing sampling error in certain IRT procedures. Applied Psychological Measurement , 8, 347-364.
12.
Wood, R.L., Wingersky, M.S., & Lord, F.M. (1976). LOGIST—A computer program for estimating examinee ability and item characteristic curve parameters (Research Memorandum 76-6). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.