Results of simulation studies indicate that the un conditional maximum likelihood method is commonly regarded as an appropriate substitute for the theoreti cally superior conditional method for estimating the parameters of the Rasch model. To this end, the un conditional estimates are "corrected" by a factor (K — 1)/K, where K is the number of items. In this paper, the simulation study of Wright and Douglas (1977b), which seemed to corroborate this correction term, is critically discussed. It appears to contain a puzzling assumption, and to rest on inadequate logic. Accordingly, there is a need for new simulation stud ies on the validity of the correction term (K — 1)/K for unconditional maximum likelihood estimation in the Rasch model. Index terms: Item response theory, item parameter estimation; Item response theory, one- parameter logistic model; Maximum likelihood estima tion, unconditional; One-parameter logistic model; Rasch model.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andersen, E.B. (1971). Conditional inference for multiple-choice questionnaires (Report No. 8). Copenhagen: Copenhagen School of Economics and Business Administration.
2.
Andersen, E.B. (1973a). A goodness-of-fit test for the Rasch model. Psychometrika, 38, 123-140.
3.
Andersen, E.B. (1973b). Conditional inference for multiple-choice questionnaires . British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology , 26, 31-44.
4.
Andersen, E.B. (1980). Discrete statistical models with social science applications. Amsterdam: North-Holland .
5.
Andersen, E.B., & Madsen, B. (1977). Estimating the parameters of the latent population distribution. Psychometrika, 42, 357-374.
6.
Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories . Psychometrika, 43, 561-573.
7.
Bock, R.D., & Aitkin, M. (1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: An application of an EM algorithm. Psychometrika , 46, 443-459.
8.
de Gruijter, D.N.M. (1986). The bias of an approximation to the unconditional maximum likelihood procedure for the Rasch model. Kwantitatieve Methoden, 20, 49-55.
9.
Fischer, G.H. (1974). Einführung in die Theorie psychologischer Tests . Bern: Huber.
10.
Fischer, G.H., & Scheiblechner, H. (1970). Algorithmen und Programme für das probabilistische Test-mode von Rasch. Psychologische Beiträge, 12, 23-51.
11.
Gustafsson, J.-E. (1980a). A solution of the conditional estimation problem for long tests in the Rasch model for dichotomous items. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40, 377-385.
12.
Gustafsson, J.-E. (1980b). Testing and obtaining fit of data to the Rasch model. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology , 33, 205-233.
13.
Haberman, S.J. (1977). Maximum likelihood estimates in exponential response models. Annals of Statistics, 5, 815-841.
14.
Jansen, P.G.W. (1983). Rasch analysis of attitudinal data. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rijks Psychologische Dienst, The Hague, The Netherlands.
15.
Jansen, P.G.W., & Roskam, E.E. (1986). Latent trait models and dichotomization of graded responses. Psychometrika, 51, 69-91.
16.
Masters, G.N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47, 149-174.
17.
Molenaar, I.W. (1983). Some improved diagnostics for failure of the Rasch model. Psychometrika, 48, 49-72.
18.
Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research. [Expanded edition, University of Chicago Press, 1980.]
19.
Rasch, G. (1966, July). An informal report on a theory of objectivity in comparisons. In L. J. van der Kamp & C. A. J. Vlek (Eds.), Proceedings of the NUFFIC (Netherlands Universities Foundation Fund for International Cooperation) international summer session in science at "Het Oude Hof," The Hague (unpublished).
20.
Rasch, G. (1977). On specific objectivity: An attempt at formalizing the request for generality and validity of scientific statements. Danish Yearbook ofPhilosophy, 14, 58-94.
21.
Roskam, E.E., & Jansen, P.G.W. (1984). A new derivation of the Rasch model. In E. Degreef & J. van Buggenhaut (Eds.), Trends in mathematical psychology (pp. 293-307). Amsterdam: Elsevier (North Holland).
22.
Stegelmann, W. (1983). Expanding the Rasch model to a general model having more than one dimension. Psychometrika, 48, 259-267.
23.
Thissen, D. (1982). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation for the one-parameter logistic model. Psychometrika, 47, 175-186.
24.
van den Wollenberg, A.L. (1980). On the Wright-Panchapakesan goodness-of-fit test for the Rasch model (Internal Report No. 80 MA 02). Nijmegen , The Netherlands: Katholieke Universiteit.
25.
van den Wollenberg, A.L. (1982). Two new test statistics for the Rasch model. Psychometrika, 47, 123-140.
26.
van den Wollenberg, A.L., Wierda, F.W., & Jansen, P.G.W. (1989). Consistency of Rasch model parameter estimation: A simulation study. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12, 307-313.
27.
Wainer, H., Morgan, A., & Gustafsson, J.-E. (1980). A review of estimation procedures for the Rasch model with an eye toward longish tests. Journal of Educational Statistics, 5, 35-64.
28.
Wright, B.D., & Douglas, G.A. (1977a). Best procedures for sample-free item analysis . Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 281-295.
29.
Wright, B.D., & Douglas, G.A. (1977b). Conditional versus unconditional procedures for sample-free item analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement , 37, 573-586.
30.
Wright, B.D., & Panchapakesan, N. (1969). A procedure for sample-free item analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 29, 23-48.
