A model is proposed that combines the theoret ical strength of the Rasch model with the heuristic power of latent class analysis. It assumes that the Rasch model holds for all persons within a latent class, but it allows for different sets of item parameters between the latent classes. An estima tion algorithm is outlined that gives conditional maximum likelihood estimates of item parameters for each class. No a priori assumption about the item order in the latent classes or the class sizes is required. Application of the model is illustrated, both for simulated data and for real data.
Andersen, E.B. (1973) A goodness of fit test for the Rasch model. Psychometrika, 38, 123-140.
2.
Bozdogan, H. (1987). Model selection and Aikake's information criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika, 52, 345-370.
3.
Clogg, C.C. (1988). Latent class models of measuring. In R. Langeheine & J. Rost (Eds.), Latent trait and latent class models (pp. 173-206). New York: Plenum.
4.
Clogg, C.C., Lindsay, B., & Grego, J. (1989). A simple latent class model for item analysis . Unpublished manuscript, Pennsylvania State University , University Park.
5.
Croon, M. (1989). Latent class analysis with ordered latent classes . Tilburg: Social Science Department, Tilburg University (submitted for publication, 1989).
6.
Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M., & Rubin, D.B. (1977). Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via the EM-algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39, 1-22.
7.
Formann, A.K. (1985). Constrained latent class models: Theory and applications . British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology , 38, 87-111.
8.
Formann, A.K. (1989a). Constrained latent class models: Some further applications. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 42, 37-54.
9.
Formann, A.K., (1989b). Latent class models with order restrictions. Research Bulletin29. Wien [Vienna]: Institute of Psychology, University of Vienna .
10.
Gustafsson, J.E. (1980). A solution of the conditional estimation problem for long tests in the Rasch model for dichotomous items. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40, 377-385.
11.
Haberman, S. (1979). Analysis of qualitative data, Vol. 2: New developments . New York: Academic Press.
12.
Heinen, T., Hagenaars, J., & Croon, M. (1989). Latent trait models in LCA perspective. Tilburg: Department of Social Sciences, Tilburg University (submitted for publication, 1989).
13.
Kelderman, H., & Macready, G.B. (in press). The use of loglinear models for assessing item bias across manifest and latent examinee groups. Journal of Educational Measurement.
14.
Langeheine, R., & Rost, J. (1988). Latent trait and latent class models. New York: Plenum.
Mislevy, R.J., & Verhelst, N. (in press). Modeling item responses when different subjects employ different solution strategies. Psychometrika.
17.
Rost, J. (1985). A latent class model for rating data. Psychometrika, 50, 37-49.
18.
Rost, J. (1988a). Test theory with qualitative and quantitative latent variables. In R. Langeheine & J. Rost (Eds.), Latent trait and latent class models (pp. 147-171). New York: Plenum.
19.
Rost, J. (1988b). Rating scale analysis with latent class models . Psychometrika, 53, 327-348.
20.
Rost, J. (in press). A logistic mixture distribution model for polychotomous item responses. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology.
21.
Rost, J., Häußler, P., & Hoffmann, L. (1989). Long-term effects of physics education in the Federal Republic of Germany. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 213-226.
