Social-psychological variables are typically measured using either cumulative or unfolding response processes. In the former, the greater the location of a person relative to the location of a stimulus on the continuum, the greater the proba bility of a positive response; in the latter, the closer the location of the person to the location of the statement, irrespective of direction, the greater the probability of a positive response. Formal probability models for these processes are, respec tively, monotonically increasing and single-peaked as a function of the location of the person relative to the location of the statement. In general, these models have been considered to be independent of each other. However, if statements constructed on the basis of a cumulative model have three ordered response categories, the response function within the statement for the middle category is in fact single-peaked. Using this observation, a unidimen sional model for responses to statements that have an unfolding structure was constructed from the cumulative Rasch model for ordered response categories. A location and unit of measurement parameter exist for each statement. A joint maxi mum likelihood estimation procedure was inves tigated. Analysis of a small simulation study and a small real dataset showed that the model is readily applicable.
Andersen, E.B. (1973). Conditional inference for multiple choice questionnaires . British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology , 26, 31-44.
Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories . Psychometrika, 43, 561-573.
4.
Andrich, D. (1979). A model for contingency tables having an ordered response classification. Biometrics, 35, 403-415.
5.
Andrich, D. (1982). An extension of the Rasch model for ratings providing both location and dispersion parameters. Psychometrika, 47, 105-113.
6.
Andrich, D. (1985). An elaboration of Guttman scaling with Rasch models for measurement. In N. Brandon Tuma (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 33-80). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
7.
Andrich, D. (1988). The application of an unfolding model of the PIRT type for the measurement of attitude. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12, 33-51.
8.
Andrich, D. (1989). A probabilistic IRT model for unfolding preference data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 193-216.
9.
Bock, R.D., & Jones, L.V. (1968). The measurement and prediction of judgement and choice. San Francisco : Holden Day .
10.
Bockenholt, U., & Böckenholt, I. (1990). Modeling individual differences in unfolding preference data: A restricted latent class approach. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 257-269.
11.
Bradley, R.A., & Terry, M.E. (1952). Rank analysis of incomplete block designs 1: The method of paired comparisons. Biometrika, 39, 324-345.
12.
Carroll, J.D. (1972). Individual differences and multidimensional scaling . In R. N. Shepard, A. K. Romney, & S. Nerlove (Eds.), Multidimensional scaling : Theory and applications in the behavioral sciences. Volume 1: Theory (pp. 105-155). New York: Seminar Press.
13.
Carroll, J.D., & De Soete, G. (1991). Toward a new paradigm for the study of multi-attribute choice behavior. American Psychologist, 46, 342-351.
14.
Coombs, C.H. (1950). Psychological scaling without a unit of measurement . Psychological Review, 57, 145-158.
15.
Coombs, C.H., & Avrunin, C.S. (1977). Single-peaked functions and the theory of preference . Psychological Review, 84, 216-230.
16.
Coombs, C.H., & Smith, J.E.K. (1973). On the detection of structure in attitudes and developmental process. Psychological Review, 80, 337-351.
17.
Cooper, L.G., & Nakanishi, M. (1983). Two logit models for external preferences. Psychometrika, 48, 607-620.
18.
David, H.A. (1963). The method of paired comparisons. New York: Hafner.
19.
Davidson, R.R., & Farquhar, P.H. (1976). A bibliography on the method of paired comparisons. Biometrics, 32, 241-252.
20.
Davison, M. (1977). On a metric, unidimensional unfolding model for attitudinal and developmental data. Psychometrika, 42, 523-548.
21.
DeSarbo, W.A., & Hoffman, D.L. (1986). Simple and weighted threshold models for the spatial representation of binary choice data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 10, 247-264.
22.
Guttman, L. (1950). The basis for scalogram analysis. In S. A. Stouffer, L. Guttman , E. A. Suchman, P. F. Lazarsfeld, S. A. Star , & J. A. Clausen (Eds.), Measurement and prediction (pp. 60-90). New York: Wiley .
23.
Guttman, L. (1954). The principal components of scalable attitudes . In P. F. Lazarsfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking in the social sciences (pp. 216-257). Glencoe IL: The Free Press.
24.
Haberman, S. (1977). Maximum likelihood estimates in exponential response models. The Annals of Statistics, 5, 815-841.
25.
Heiser, W.J. (1989). Order invariant unfolding analysis under smoothness restrictions. In G. De Soete, H. Feger, & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), New developments in psychological choice modeling (pp. 3-31). Amsterdam : North-Holland.
26.
Hoijtink, H. (1990). A latent trait model for dichotomous choice data . Psychometrika, 55, 641-656.
27.
Jansen, P.G.W. (1984). Relationships between the Thurstone, Coombs, and Rasch approaches to item scaling. Applied Psychological Measurement , 8, 373-383.
28.
Jansen, P.G.W., Van den Wollenberg, A.L., & Wierda, F.W. (1988). Correcting unconditional parameter estimates in the Rasch model for inconsistency. Applied Psychological Measurement , 12, 297-306.
Poole, K.T. (1984). Least squares metric, unidimensional unfolding . Psychometrika, 49, 311-323.
31.
Post, W.J., & Snijders, T.A.B. (1992). Nonparametric unfolding models: A latent structure approach. Leiden, The Netherlands: DSWO Press.
32.
Rasch, G. (1960/1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research. [Expanded edition, University of Chicago Press.]
33.
Schonemann, P.H. (1970). On metric multidimensional unfolding. Psychometrika, 35, 349-366.
34.
Schonemann, P.H., & Wang, M.M. (1972). An individual difference model for the multidimensional analysis of preference data. Psychometrika, 37, 275-309.
35.
Sixtl, F. (1973). Probabilistic unfolding. Psychometrika , 38, 235-248.
36.
Tanzer, N. (1983). Meassung von Einstellungen mittels probabilisticher Mebmodelle [The measurement of attitudes by means of probabilistic measurement models]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Vienna.
37.
Thurstone, L.L. (1926). The scoring of individual performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 17, 446-457.
38.
Thurstone, L.L. (1927). A law of comparative judgement. Psychological Review, 34, 278-286.
39.
Thurstone, L.L. (1928). Attitudes can be measured. American Journal of Sociology, 33, 529-554.
40.
Van Schuur, W.H. (1984). Structure in political beliefs, a new model for stochastic unfolding with application to European party activists. Amsterdam: CT Press.
41.
Van Schuur, W.H. (1988). Stochastic unfolding. In W. E. Saris & I. N. Gallhofer (Eds.), Sociometric research. Volume 1: Data collection and scaling (pp. 137-158). London: Macmillan.
42.
Van Schuur, W.H. (1989). Unfolding German political parties: A description and application of multiple unidimensional unfolding. In G. De Soete, H. Ferger, & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), New developments in psychological choice modelling (pp. 259-277). Amsterdam : North Holland.
43.
Verhelst, N.D., & Verstralen, H.H.F.M. (1991). A stochastic model for inherently missing data. Unpublished manuscript.
44.
Wohlwill, J.F. (1963). The measurement of scalability for non-cumulative items. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 23, 543-555.
45.
Wright, B.D. (1988). The efficacy of unconditional maximum likelihood bias correction: Comment on Jansen, van den Wollenberg, and Wierda. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12, 315-324.
46.
Wright, B.D., & Douglas, G.A. (1977). Conditional versus unconditional procedures for sample-free item analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement , 37, 47-60.
