Improved Care and Reduced Costs for Patients Requiring Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: the Role of Bedside Ultrasound and a Dedicated Team

Abstract

Background: We conducted a prospective quality assurance (QA) study to determine if a team dedicated to placing peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) would improve patient care and reduce costs. Methods: In April 2000, a dedicated team of physicians, physician assistants, nurses, and interventional radiologists (IR) was established to coordinate and approve all PICC placements at our hospital. Ultrasound (US) became available in November 2000 to assist with bedside PICC placement. A QA database was created allowing data from 3 time periods reflecting initiation of the PICC service (April–June 2000), initial implementation of bedside US-guided PICC placement (October–December 2000), and the current service (October–December 2002) to be analyzed and compared. Results: For all time periods analyzed, the PICC team found that one-third of PICC requests was inappropriate and, therefore, disapproved placement. With addition of US, the bedside PICC placement rate increased to 94% compared with 73% at service initiation. This was associated with an overall 80% decrease in average patient waiting time for a PICC, facilitating more timely discharges from the hospital. Finally, placement costs were reduced by 9% six months after initiation of our service and by 24% after US became available. Conclusions: A dedicated PICC team improves patient care by preventing inappropriate PICC placements and decreasing patient waiting times. A PICC team with US capability also reduces costs by minimizing expensive use of IR facilities and reducing hospital lengths of stay. A dedicated PICC service should become the standard of care for all hospitals with high-volume PICC use.

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are becoming a popular method for obtaining central venous access in hospitalized patients. This study indicates that a dedicated PICC placement team using bedside ultrasound technology improves the success rate of bedside placement, decreases patient wait time for PICC placement, and decreases placement costs.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ryder MA. Peripherally inserted central venous catheters.Nurs Clin North Am. 1993 ;28:937– 971.

Orr ME. The peripherally inserted central catheter: what are the current indications for its use? Nutr Clin Pract. 2002 ;17:99– 104.

Horattas MC, Trupiano J, Hopkins S, Pasini D, Martiono C, Murty A. Changing concepts in long-term central venous access: catheter selection and cost savings. Am J Infect Control. 2001 ;29:32– 40.

Ng PK, Ault MJ, Ellrodt G, Maldonado L. Peripherally inserted central catheters in general medicine. Mayo Clin Proc. 1997 ;72:225– 233.

Chrisman HB, Omary RA, Nemcek AA, Ryu RK, Saker MB, Vogelzang RL. Peripherally inserted central catheters: guidance with use of US versus venography in 2650 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999 ;10:473– 475.

Randolph AG, Cook DJ, Gonzales CA, Pribble CG. Ultrasound guidance for placement of central venous catheters: a metaanalysis of the literature.Crit Care Med. 1996;24:2053– 2058.

Hind D, Calvert N, McWilliams R, et al. Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2003 ;327:361– 367.

McMahon DD. Evaluating new technology to improve patient outcomes.J Infus Nurs. 2002;25:250– 255.

Parkinson R, Gandhi M, Harper J, Archibald C. Establishing an ultrasound guided peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) insertion service. Clin Radiol. 1997 ;53:33– 36.

10.

Royer T. Nurse-driven interventional technology: a cost and benefit perspective. J Infus Nurs. 2001 ;24:326– 331.

11.

Cardella JF, Cardella K, Bacci N, Fox PS, Post JH. Cumulative experience with 1273 peripherally inserted central catheters at a single institution. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1996 ;7:5– 13.

12.

Barber JM, Booth DM, King JA, Chakraverty S. A nurse led peripherally inserted central catheter line insertion service is effective with radiological support. Clin Radiol. 2002 ;57:352– 354.