External Bolster Placement After Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Insertion: Is Looser Better?

Abstract

Background: Abdominal and gastric wall inflammation, infection, and necrosis after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement is a topic of importance but of limited study. Healing of the abdominal wound after PEG placement is thought to be dependent on a number of factors, including the patient's nutrition status, comorbid disease status, and postprocedural PEG wound care. Another important factor that may influence wound healing is tissue tension and compression. This requires special attention to the correct placement of the external bolster of the PEG tube against the abdominal wall. Methods: We performed a study in mongrel dogs to determine the relevance of tissue compression on PEG-tube wound healing; 8 mongrel dogs each received 3 separate 24 Fr PEG tubes at 1 endoscopic setting. After PEG placement, the external bolster was placed at 0 cm, 1 cm, or 4 cm from the abdominal wall. Post-PEG care and enteral feedings were standardized. The dogs were killed at 3 weeks. Results: Partial migration of the PEG internal bolster into the gastric wall occurred in 1 of 8 of the PEG tubes with the external bolster at 0 cm. PEG-tube-tract tissue inflammation was worse in the dogs with the external bolster placed at 0 cm. Conclusions: The position of the external bolster in relation to the abdominal wall may be an important factor in the healing of a post–PEG-tube-placement tissue tract.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement is a commonly performed enteral-access technique. Wound healing after any abdominal-wall injury is a biologic process that is well described in the literature. The position of the external bolster against the abdominal wall after PEG placement may play a role in peri-PEG tube wound healing.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Modlin IR. A Brief History of Endoscopy. Milan, Italy: MultiMed; 2000: 111.

Stamm M. Gastrostomy by the new method. Med News. 1894 ;65:324– 326.

Gauderer MW, Ponsky JL, Izant RJ Jr. Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pediatr Surg. 1980;15:872– 875.

Grant JP. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: initial placement by single endoscopic technique and long-term follow-up. Ann Surg. 1993 ;217:168– 174.

Ponsky JL, Gauderer MW, Stellato TA, Aszodi A. Percutaneous approaches to enteral alimentation. Am J Surg. 1985 ;149:102– 105.

Larson DE, Burton DD, Schroeder KW, DiMagno EP. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: indications, success, complications, and mortality in 314 consecutive patients. Gastroenterology. 1987 ;93:48– 52.

Delatore J, Boylan JJ. Bleeding gastric ulcer: a complication from gastrostomy tube placement. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 ;51:482– 484.

Wiener GJ. Complications caused by the tip of gastrostomy tubes and Foley catheters. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 ;94:3656– 3657.

Ugochukwu NC. Role of tube design and selection in occurrence of gastric lesser curvature ulceration by percutaneous gastrostomy tubes: an issue for adult patients? Dig Dis Sci. 2001 ;49:1827– 1832.

10.

Delegge MH. Enteral access: the foundation of feeding. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2001 ;25(suppl):S8– S13.

11.

Hausman MR, Rinker BD. Intractable wounds and infections: the role of impaired vascularity and advanced surgical methods for treatment. Am J Surg. 2004;187:44S– 55S.

12.

Wywialowski EF. Tissue perfusion as a key underlying concept of pressure ulcer development and treatment. J Vasc Nurs. 1999 ;17:12– 16.

13.

Chung RS, Schertzer M. Pathogenesis of complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a lesson in surgical principles.Am Surg. 1990;56:134– 137.

14.

Reid MR. Some considerations of problems of wound healing. N Engl J Med. 1936;215:753– 766.

15.

Meyers MB, Cherry G. Functional and angiographic vasculature in healing wounds. Ann Surg. 1970 ;36:750– 756.

16.

Bartlett LC. Pressure necrosis is the primary cause of wound dehiscence. Can J Surg. 1985 ;28:27– 30.

17.

Frantz RA. Evidence-based protocol: prevention of pressure ulcers.J Gerontol Nurs. 2004;30:4– 11.

18.

Mellinger JD, Simon IB, Schlechter B, Lash RH, Ponsky JL. Tract formation following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in an animal model.Surg Endosc. 1991;5:189– 191.