A limited number of studies have identified multilevel determinants of chief executive officer (CEO) commitment to the status quo (CSQ). Using an unintrusive measure of CEO CSQ developed through computer-aided content analyses of CEO letters to shareholders, this study confirmed that determinants of CEO CSQ are multilevel, including factors at the individual (CEO age and tenure), organizational (size and financial slack), and industry (extent of industry discretion) levels of analysis. In addition, as an important extension to prior research, the authors find that CEO CSQ is associated with future performance changes depending on a firm’s industry environment. They find that in high-discretion industries, firms whose CEOs are committed to the status quo suffer future financial and market performance declines as compared with their competitors, whereas such performance deterioration does not occur in low-discretion environments. Indeed, when future performance is market based and measured as Tobin’s Q, the authors find that compared with competitors, a firm’s performance actually improves in low-discretion industries if its CEO is committed to the status quo.
Aguinis, H., Beaty, J.C., Boik, R.J., & Pierce, C.A.2005. Effect size and power in assessing moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: A 30-year review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 94-107.
2.
Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G.1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
Abrahamson, E., & Hambrick, D.C.1997. Attentional homogeneity in industries: The effect of discretion. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18: 513-532.
4.
Aldrich, H.1979. Organizations and environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5.
Andrews, K.1971. The concept of corporate strategy. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin.
6.
Barker, V.L., III, & Mone, M.A.1998. The mechanistic structure shift and strategic reorientation in declining firms attempting turnarounds. Human Relations , 51: 1227-1258.
Bowman, E.H.1984. Content analysis of annual reports for corporate strategy and risk. Interfaces, 14: 61-71.
10.
Carlson, R., & Karlsson, K.1970. Age, cohorts, and the generation of generations. American Sociological Review, 35: 710-718.
11.
Carpenter, M.A., Geletkanycz, M.A., & Sanders, W.M.2004. Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition, Journal of Management, 30: 749-778.
12.
Child, J.1972. Organization structure, environment, and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6:1-22.
13.
Champoux, J.E., & Peters, W.S.1987. Form, effect size, and power in moderated regression analysis . Journal of Occupational Psychology, 60: 243-255.
14.
Cho, T.S., & Hambrick, D.C.2006. Attention patterns as mediators between top management team characteristics and strategic change: The case of airline deregulation. Organization Science, 17: 453-469.
15.
Chung, K.H., & Pruitt, S.W.1994. A simple approximation of Tobin’s Q. Financial Management, 23: 70-74.
16.
Clapham, S.E., & Schwenk, C.R.1991. Self-serving attributions, managerial cognition, and company performance. Strategic Management Journal, 12: 219-229.
17.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P.1983. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
Cyert, R.M., & March, J.G.1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19.
D’Aveni, R.A.1989. The aftermath of organizational decline: A longitudinal study of the strategic and managerial characteristics of declining firms. Academy of Management Journal, 32: 577-605.
20.
D’Aveni, R.A., & MacMillan, I.C.1990. Crisis and the content of managerial communications: A study of the focus of attention of top managers in surviving and failing firms. Administrative Science Quarterly , 35: 634-657.
Duriau, V.J., Reger, R.K., & Pfarrer, M.D.2007. A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organization studies: Research themes, data sources, and methodological refinements. Organizational Research Methods, 10: 5-34.
23.
Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D.C.1990. Top management team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion . Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 485-503.
24.
Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D.C.1996. Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.
25.
Fiol, M.C.1995. Corporate communications: Comparing executives’ private and public statements. Academy of Management Journal , 38: 522-36.
Geletkanycz, M.A.1997. The salience of "culture’s consequences": The effects of cultural values on top executive commitment to the status quo. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 615-634.
28.
Geletkanycz, M.A., & Black, S.S.2001. Bound by the past? Experience-based effects on commitment to the strategic status quo. Journal of Management, 27: 3-21.
29.
Granovetter, M.1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness . American Journal of Sociology, 91: 481-510.
30.
Grimm, C.M., & Smith, K.G.1991. Management and organizational change: A note on the railroad industry. Strategic Management Journal, 12: 557-562.
31.
Hambrick, D.C., & Abrahamson, E.1995. Assessing managerial discretion across industries: A multimethod approach. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 1427-1441.
32.
Hambrick, D.C., & D’Aveni, R.A.1988. Large corporate failures as downward spirals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33: 1-23.
33.
Hambrick, D.C., & Finkelstein, S.1987. Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views on organizations. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior Vol. 9: 369-406. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
34.
Hambrick, D.C., Finkelstein, S., & Mooney, A.C.2005. Executive job demands: New insights for explaining strategic decisions and leader behaviors. Academy of Management Review , 30: 472-491.
35.
Hambrick, D.C., & Fukutomi, G.D.1991. The seasons of a CEO’s tenure. Academy of Management Review, 16: 719-742.
36.
Hambrick, D.C., Geletkanycz, M.A., & Fredrickson, J.W.1993. Top management commitment to the status quo: Some tests of its determinants. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 401-418.
37.
Hambrick, D.C., & Mason, P.1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9: 193-206.
38.
Hambrick, D.C., & Schecter, S.1983. Turnaround strategies for mature industrial product business units. Academy of Management Journal, 26: 231-248.
39.
Hannan, M., & Freeman, J.1977. The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82: 929-964.
40.
Hannan, M., & Freeman, J.1984. Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49: 149-164.
41.
Haveman, H.A.1993. Organizational size and change: Diversification in the savings and loan industry after deregulation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 20-50.
42.
Henderson, A.D., Miller, D., & Hambrick, D.C.2006. How quickly do CEOs become obsolete? Industry dynamism, CEO tenure, and company performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27: 447-460.
43.
Holsti, O.R.1968. Content analysis. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (2nd ed.), Vol. 2: 596-692. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Insch, G.S., Moore, J.E., & Murphy, L.D.1997. Content analysis in leadership research: Examples, procedures, and suggestions for future use. Leadership Quarterly, 8: 1-25.
46.
Jaccard, J., Turrisi, R., & Wan, C.1990. Interaction effects in multiple regression. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
47.
Kabanoff, B.1996. The computer can read as well as count: How computer-aided text analysis can benefit organizational research. In C. Cooper & D. Rousseau (Eds.), Trends in organizational behavior, Vol. 3: 1-21. Chichester , UK: Wiley.
48.
Kabanoff, B., & Brown S.2008. Knowledge structures of prospectors, analyzers, and defenders: content, structure, stability and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29: 249-171.
49.
Kabanoff, B., Waldersee, R., & Cohen, M.1995. Espoused values and organizational change themes. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 1075-1104.
50.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A.1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47: 313-327.
51.
Krippendorff, K.1980. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
52.
Lubatkin, M.H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J.F.2006. Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of TMT behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32: 1-27
53.
Lawrence, B.S.1997. The black box of organizational demography. Organization Science, 8: 1-22.
54.
Lee, D.Y.1997. The impact of poor performance on risk-taking attitudes: A longitudinal study with a PLS causal modeling approach. Decision Sciences, 28: 59-80.
55.
MacCrimmon, K.R., & Wehrung, D.A.1986. Taking risks: The management of uncertainty. New York: Free Press.
56.
Miller, D.1991. Stale in the saddle: CEO tenure and the match between organization and environment. Management Science, 37: 591-614.
57.
Mintzberg, H.1983. Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
58.
Mone, M.A., McKinley, W., & Barker, V.L., III.1998. Organizational decline and innovation: A contingency framework. Academy of Management Review, 23: 115-132.
59.
Morris, R.1994. Computerized content analysis in management research: A demonstration of its advantages and limitations. Journal of Management, 20: 903-931.
60.
Musteen, M., Barker, V.L., III, & Baeten, V.L.2006. CEO attributes associated with attitude toward change: The direct and moderating effects of CEO tenure. Journal of Business Research, 59: 604-612.
61.
Nadkarni, S., & Narayanan, V.K.2007. Strategic schemas, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: The moderating role of industry clockspeed . Strategic Management Journal, 28: 243-270.
62.
Olson, M.1982. The rise and decline of nations. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
63.
Olson, B., Parayitam, S., & Bao, Y.2007. Strategic decision making: The effects of cognitive diversity, conflict and trust on decision outcomes. Journal of Management , 33: 196-222.
64.
Pettigrew, A.1985. The awakening giant: Continuity and change in Imperial Chemical Industries. London: Blackwell .
65.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G.R.1978. The external control of organizations . New York: Harper & Row.
66.
Porter, M.E.1980. Competitive strategy. New York: Free Press.
67.
Priem, R.L., Lyon, D.W., & Dess, G.G.1999. Inherent limitations of demographic proxies in top management team heterogeneity research. Journal of Management, 25: 935-953.
68.
Quinn, R.E., & Cameron, K.1983. Organizational life cycles and shifting criteria of effectiveness: Some preliminary evidence. Management Science, 29: 33-50.
69.
Rosenthal, R.1990. Replication in behavioral research. In J. Neuliep (Ed.), Replication research in social sciences: 1-30. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
70.
Schwenk, C.R.1995. Strategic decision making. Journal of Management, 21: 471-493.
71.
Salancik, G.R.1977. Commitment and the control of organizational behavior and belief. In B. M. Staw & G. R. Salancik (Eds.), New directions in organizational behavior: 1-54, Chicago: St. Clair Press.
72.
Salancik, G.R., & Meindl, J.R.1984. Corporate attributions as strategic allusions of management control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 238-254.
73.
Simsek, Z.2007. CEO tenure and organizational performance: An intervening model. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 653-662.
74.
Singh, J.V.1986. Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 29: 562-585.
75.
Starbuck, W.H., & Milliken, F.J.1988. Challenger: Finetuning the odds until something breaks. Journal of Management Studies , 25: 319-340.
76.
Staw, B.M., & Ross, J.1980. Commitment in an experimenting society: A study of the attribution of leadership from administrative scenarios. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65: 249-260.
77.
Staw, B.M., Sandelands, L.E., & Dutton, J.E.1981. Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26: 501-524.
78.
Stickney, C.P.1990. Financial statement analysis: A strategic perspective . New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich .
79.
Thompson, J.D.1967. Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
80.
Tinker, T., Niemark, M., Burrel, G., & Crompton, R.1987. The role of annual reports in gender and class contradictions at General Motors: 1917-1976. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12: 71-110.
81.
Tourangeau, R., Rips, L.J., & Rasinski, K.A.2000. The psychology of survey response. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
82.
Tushman, M.L., & Romanelli, E.1985. Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 7: 171-222, Greenwich, CT : JAI Press.
83.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D.1992. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5: 297-323.
84.
Vroom, V.H., & Pahl, B.1971. Relationship between age and risk taking among managers . Journal of Applied Psychology, 55: 399-405.
85.
Wanous, J.P.1980. Organizational entry: Recruitment, selection, and socialization of newcomers. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
Wiersema, M.E., & Bantel, K.A.1992. Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 91-121.
88.
Wilensky, H.1967. Organizational intelligence. New York : Basic Books.
89.
Wu, S., Levitas, E., & Priem, R.L.2005. CEO tenure and company invention under differing levels of technological dynamism. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 859-873.
