The authors provide two examples of contemporary and contentious issues related to the governance of publicly traded corporations—the composition of boards of directors and the choice of CEO or board chairperson leadership structures. In each case, despite voluminous empirical attention, there is virtually no evidence related to the financial performance of the firm with regard to either of these fundamental elements of firms’ governance structures. The authors suggest that these null results may be related to the inadequacy of analyses relied on to examine such issues, an inadequacy that might be constructively addressed by more attention to multi-level alternatives.
Baliga, B.R., Moyer, R.C., & Rao, R.S.1996. CEO duality and firm performance: What’s the fuss ? Strategic Management Journal, 17: 41-53.
2.
Bebchuk, L., Cohen, A., & Ferrell, A.2009. What matters in corporate governance?Review of Financial Economics, 22: 783-827.
3.
Bhagat, S., Bolton, B., & Romano, R.2008. The promise and peril of corporate governance indices . Columbia Law Review, 108: 1803-1882.
4.
Boyd, B.K.1995. CEO duality and firm performance: A contingency model . Strategic Management Journal, 16: 301-312.
5.
Brickley, J.A., Coles, J.L., & Jarrell, G.1997. Leadership structure: Separating the CEO and chairman of the board. Journal of Corporate Finance, 3: 189-220.
6.
Cain, K.2003. New efforts to strengthen corporate governance: Why use SRO listing standards? Columbia Business Law Review, 1: 619-659.
7.
Chi, T.2009. Corporate governance: CII (Council of Institutional Investors) urges Congress to adopt corporate governance reforms. Corporate Governance Report, 12(1): 4-5.
8.
Coles, J.L., Daniel, N.D., & Naveen, L.2008. Boards: Does one size fit all? Journal of Financial Economics, 87: 329-356.
9.
Conger, J.A., & Lawler, E.E.2009. Why your board needs a non-executive chair. In J. A. Conger (Ed.), Boardroom realities : 51-67. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
10.
Dahya, J., Garcia, L.G., & van Bommel, J.2009. One man two hats-What’s all the commotion!Financial Review, 44: 179-212.
11.
Daily, C.M., Johnson, J.L., & Dalton, D.R.1999. On the measurements of board composition: Poor consistency and a serious mismatch of theory and operationalization. Decision Sciences, 30: 83-106.
12.
Dalton, D.R., Daily, C.M., Ellstrand, A.E., & Johnson, J.L.1998. Board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance: Meta-analytic reviews and research agenda. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 269-290.
13.
Dalton, D.R., Hitt, M.A., Certo, S.T., & Dalton, C.M.2008. The fundamental agency problem and its mitigation: Independence, equity, and the market for corporate control. In J. P. Walsh & A. P. Brief (Eds.), Annals of the Academy of Management (Vol. 1): 1-64. New York : Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
DeRue, D.S., Petersen, E., Mannor, M.J., & Morgeson, F.P. 2009. A two-horse race? The impact of CEO characteristics and governance structures on firm performance . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Anaheim, CA.
15.
Dey, A.2008. Corporate governance and agency conflicts. Journal of Accounting Research, 46: 1143-1181.
16.
Dey, A., Engel, E.E., & Liu, X.G.2010. CEO and board chair roles: To split or not to split. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1412827.
17.
Douglas, W.O.1934. Directors who do not direct. Harvard Law Review, 47: 1305-1334.
18.
Eisenberg, M.A.1976. The structure of the corporation: A legal analysis. New York: Little Brown.
19.
Faleye, O.2007. Does one hat fit all? The case of corporate leadership structure. Journal of Management and Governance, 11: 239-259.
20.
Fama, E.F.1980. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88: 288-307.
21.
Fama, E.F., & Jensen, M.C.1983a. Agency problems and residual claims. Journal of Law and Economics, 26: 327-349.
22.
Fama, E.F., & Jensen, M.C.1983b. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26: 301-325.
23.
Finkelstein, S., & D’Aveni, R.A.1994. CEO duality as a double-edged sword: How boards of directors balance entrenchment avoidance and unity of command. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 1079-1108.
24.
Fogel, E.M., & Geier, A.M.2007. Strangers in the house: Rethinking Sarbanes-Oxley and the independent board of directors. Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 32: 33-72.
25.
Gordon, J.N.2007. The rise of independent directors in the United States, 1950-2005: Of shareholder value and stock market prices. Standard Law Review, 59: 1465-1568.
26.
Green, S.2004. Unfinished business: Abolish the imperial CEO. Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance, 15: 19-22.
27.
Iyengar, R., & Zampelli, E.M.2009. Self-selection, endogeneity, and the relationship between CEO duality and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 1092-1112.
28.
Jensen, M.C.1993. The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance, 48: 831-888.
29.
Jensen, M.C., & Meckling, W.F.1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305-360.
30.
Kaplan, A.1964. The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for behavioral sciences . San Francisco: Chandler.
31.
Linck, J.S., Netter, J.M., & Yang, T.2009. The effects and unintended consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on corporate boards. Review of Financial Studies, 22: 3287-3328.
32.
MacAvoy, P.W., & Millstein, I.M.2003. The recurrent crisis in corporate governance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan .
33.
Mizruchi, M.S.1983. Who controls whom? An examination of the relation between management and board of directors in large American corporations. Academy of Management Review, 8: 426-435.
34.
Monks, R.A.G., & Minow, N.2008. Corporate governance. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley.
35.
NASDAQ Stock Exchange guidelines.2010. In Comparison of corporate governance guidelines and codes of best practice . From http://www.weil.com/news/pubdetail.aspx?pub=9333 , accessed January 20, 2010.
36.
New York Stock Exchange guidelines.2010. In Comparison of corporate governance guidelines and codes of best practice . From http://www.weil.com/news/pubdetail.aspx?pub=9333 , accessed January 20, 2010.
37.
Rhoades, D.L., Rechner, P.L., & Sundaramurthy, C.2000. Board composition and financial performance: A review and contingency model. Journal of Managerial Issues, 12: 76-91.
38.
Romano, R.2005. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the making of corporate governance . Yale Law Journal, 114: 1521-1604.
39.
Rousseau, D.M.1985. Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7): 1-37. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
40.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act.2002. From the AICPA website, http://thecaq.aicpa.org/Resources/Sarbanes-Oxley/summary+of+the+provisions+of+the+Sarbanes+Oxley+Act+of+2002.htm, accessed January 20, 2010.
41.
Securities and Exchange Commission.2009. SEC approves enhanced disclosure about risk, compensation and corporate governance . From www.sec.gov/news/press/2009/2009-268.htm, accessed January 20, 2010.
42.
Simsek, A., Veiga, J.G., Lubatkin, M.H., & Dino, R.N.2005. Modeling the multilevel determinants of top management team behavioral integration. Academy of Management Journal , 48: 69-84.
43.
Wagner, J.A., Steimpert, J.L., & Fubara, E.I.1998. Board composition and organizational performance: Two studies of insider/outsider effects. Journal of Management Studies, 35: 655-677.
44.
Walsh, J.P., & Seward, J.K.1990. On the efficiency of internal and external corporate control mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 15: 421-458.C
