This study extends the previous research on creativity and person-environment fit by examining fit on the dimension of creativity and by incorporating both supply-value and demand-ability versions of fit. A fit between demands for creativity and abilities for creativity was related to lower strain and higher job satisfaction. However, the most impressive influence on outcomes was the environmental influence; particularly the influence of supplies for creativity. The version of fit examined also affected results. Supply-value and demand-ability versions of fit exhibited different relationships with outcomes. These results suggest that more research is needed to explore specific environmental conditions that encourage creativity in organizations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abbey, A. & Dickson, J.W. (1983). R&D work climate and innovation in semiconductors. Academy of Management Journal, 26 (2): 362-368.
2.
Alutto, J.A. & Belasco, J.A. (1972). A typology for participation in organizational decision-making. Administration Science Quarterly17: 117-125.
3.
Amabile, T.M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 45 (2): 357-376.
4.
Amabile, T.M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Pp. 123-167 in B. Staw & L.L. Cummings (eds.). Research in organizational behavior. Vol. IO. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
5.
Amabile, T.M. & Gryskiewicz, N.D. (1989). The creative environment scale: Work environment inventory. Creativity Research Journal, 2: 231-252.
6.
Amabile. T.M., Gryskiewicz, N. D., Burnside. R. & Koester, N. (1990). Creative environment scrr1r.s; Work environment inventory, a guide to its development and USP. Unpublished manuscript, Center for Creative Leadership, Greensboro, NC.
7.
Bachtold. L.M. & Werner, E.E. (1973). Personality characteristics of creative women. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 36: 311-319.
8.
Barron, F. & Harrington, D.M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, personality. Annual Review of psychology, 32: 439-476.
9.
Bedeian. A.G. & Day, D.V. (1994a). Difference scores: Rationale, formulation, and interpretation. Journal of Management, 20: 673-674.
Blau, G. (1981). An empirical investigation of job stress, social support, service length. and job strain, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 27: 279-302.
12.
Broadbent, D. (1987). Is autonomy always a good thing?The Occupational Psychologist, 1: 7-15.
13.
Bumside, R.M. (1990). Improving corporate climates for creativity. Pp. 265-284 in M.A. West & J.L. Farr (eds.), Innovations and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
14.
Caplan, R.D. (1983). Person-environment fit: Past. present, and future. Pp. 35-78 in C.L. Cooper (ed.), Stress research. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
15.
Caplan, R.D. (1987). Person-environment fit theory and organizations: Commensurate dimensions. time perspectives, and mechanisms. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31: 248-267.
16.
Caplan, R.D., Cobb, S., French, J.R.P. Jr., Harrison, R.V. & Pinneau, S.R. Jr. (1980). Job demands and worker health: Main effects and occupational differences. University of Michigan: Institute for Social Research.
17.
Caplan, R.D., Tripathi, R.C. & Naidu, R.K. (1985). Subjective past, present and future fit: Effects on anxiety, depression, and other indicators of well being, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(l): 180-197.
18.
Cattell, R.B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure, growth, and action. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
19.
Chatman. J.A. (1989). Improving interactional organizational reseach: A mode1 of person-organization fit. Academy of Management Review, 14: 333-349.
20.
Cook, J. & Wall, T. (1980). New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfillment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53: 39-52.
21.
Cronbach, L.J. & Furby, L. (1970). How should we measure “change” -or should we?Psychological Bulletin, 74: 68-80.
22.
Diener, E.. Larsen, R. & Emmons, R. (1984). Person x situation interactions: Choice of situations and congruence response models. Journal of Personality und So&l Psychology, 47: 580-592.
23.
Edwards, J.R. (1991). Person-job fit: A conceptual integration, literature review, and methodological critique. Pp. 283-357 in CL. Cooper & I.T. Robertson (eds.), International review of indust&rial and organizational psychology, Vol. 6. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
24.
Edwards, J.R. (1992). Job .stress as person-environment misfit; A three-dimensional examination of the person, the environment. und strain. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Las Vegas, NV.
25.
Edwards, J.R. (1994a). The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: Critique and a proposed alternative. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58: 51-100.
26.
Edwards, J.R. (1994b). Regression analysis as an alternative to difference scores. Journal of Management, 20: 683-690.
27.
Edwards, J.R. & Cooper, C.L. (1990). The person-environment fit approach to stress: Recurring problems and some suggested solutions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11: 293-307.
28.
Edwards, J.R. & Harrison, R.V. (1993). Job demands and worker health: Three-dimensional reexamination of the relationship between person-environment fit and strain. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78: 628-648.
29.
Edwards, J.R. & Parry, M.E. (1993). On the use of polynomial regression equations an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal,.?6: 1577-1613.
30.
Farr. J.L. & Ford, C.M. (1990). Individual innovation. Pp. 63-80 in M.A. West & J.L. Farr (eds.). Innovation and creativity at work. New York: John Wiley & Son.
31.
French, J.R.P.. Caplan. R.D. & Harrison. R.V. (1982). The mechanism of job stress and strain. New York: John Wiley & Son.
32.
French. J.R.P.. Rodgers. W. & Cobb. S. (1974). Adjustment as person-environment fit. Pp. 316-333 in G.V. Coelho.D.A. Hamburg & J.E. Adams (eds.). Coping and adaptation. New York: Basic Book.
33.
Furnham. A. & Schaeffcr. R. (1984). Person-environment fit. job satisfaction and mental health. Journal of Occupational Psychology, v 57: 295-307.
34.
Goldsmith. R.E. (1986). Convergent validity of four innovativeness scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 4o: 81-87.
35.
Gough, H.G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the adjective cheek list. Journal Personality and Social Psychology, 37: 1398-1405.
36.
Greene, C.N. (1972). The satisfaction-performance controversy. &Business Hormons, /4(S): 31-41.
37.
Hackman. J.R. & Lawler. E.E. III. (1971). Employee reactions to job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology Monograph, 55: 259-286.
38.
Hackman. J.R. & Oldham, G.R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, cg, 60(2): 159-170.
Harrison, R. V. (1976) Job demands and worker health: Person-environment misfit. Dissertation Abstracts International. .17: 103SB. (University Microfilms No. 76-19, 150).
41.
Harrison, R. V. (1978). Person-environment fit and job stress. Pp. 175-205 in C.L. Cooper & R. Payne (eds.). Stress at work. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
42.
Harrison, R.V., Moss. G.E., Dtelman, T.E.. Horvath. W.J. & Harlan, W.R. (1987). Person-environment fit. type A behavior. and work strain: The complexity of the process. Pp. 72-92 in J.C. Quick, R.S. Bhagat.J.E. Dalton & J.D. Quick (eds.). Work, strrss: Health care systems in the workplace. New York: Praeger.
43.
Helson, R. & Crutchfield. R.S. (1970). Creative types in mathematics. Journal of Personality, ?K: 177-197.
44.
Holland, J.L. (1985). Making vocational choices: A theory of careers, 2nd ed.Englewood Cliff. NJ: Prentice Hall.
45.
Hollenbeck. J.R. (1989). Control theory and the perception of work environments: The effects of focus of attention on affective and behavioral reactions to work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43: 406-430.
46.
House. J.S. (1972). The relationship of intrinsic and extrinsic work motivations to occupational stress and corenary heart disease risk. Dissertation Abstracts International. 33: 2.5 14-A. (University Microfilms No. 72. 29094).
47.
House. R.J. & Rizro. J.R. (1972). Role conflict and ambiguity as critical variables in a model of organizational behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human performance, 7: 467-505.
48.
Hrebiniak. L.G. (1974). Effects of job level and participation on employee attitudes and perceptions of influence. Academy of Management Journal, 17: 649-662.
49.
Hurt. H.T.. Joseph. K. & Cook, C.D. (1977). Scales for the measurement of innovativeness. Human Communication Research4(1): 58-65.
50.
Isaksen, S.G. & Puccio, G.J. (1988). Adaptation-innovation and the torrance tests of creative thinking: The level-style issue revisited. Psychological Reports63: 659-670.
51.
Joyce, W. & Slocum, J. (1984). Collective climate: Agreement as a basis for defining aggregate climates in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 27: 721-742.
52.
Kanter. R.M. (1983). The change masters. New York: Simon and Schuster.
53.
Kenny, D.A. (1979). Correlation and causality. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
54.
Kulik. C.T., Oldham, G.R. & Hackman, J.R. (1987). Work design as an approach to person-environment fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31: 278-296.
55.
Kulka, R. A. (1976) Adjustment in high school: Person-environment fit. interaction or transaction. Dissertation Abstracts International. X: S352B.
56.
Kulka, R. A. (1979). Interaction as person-environment fit. Pp. 55-71 in L.R. Kahle (ed.), New directions for methodology of behavioral science. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
57.
Lachman. R. & Aranya, N. (1986). Evaluation of alternative models of commitments and job attitudes of professionals. Journal of occupational Behavior, 7: 227-243.
58.
Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of iopological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
59.
Lind, S.K. & Mumford. M.D. (1987). Values as predictors of job performance and advancement potential. Paper presented at the meetings of the Southeastern Psychological Association. Atlanta. GA.
60.
Locke. E.A. (1969). What is job satisfaction?Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4: 309-336.
61.
Locke. E.A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. Pp. 1293-1349 in M.D. Dunnette (ed.). Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally.
62.
Lofquist. L. & Dawis, R. (1969). Adjustment of work. New York: Appleton-Century Crafts.
Mendelsohn, G.A. (1976). Associative and attentional processes in creative performance. Journal of Personality, 4(4): 451-471.
65.
Miles, R.H. (1975). An empirical test of causal inference between role perceptions of conflict and ambiguity and various personal outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology60: 334-339.
66.
Miles, R.H. & Perreault. W.D. (1976). Organizational role conflicts: Its antecedents and consequences, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 17: 19-44.
67.
Mowday. R.T.. Steers. R.M. & Porter, L.W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14: 224-247.
68.
Mowday. R.T. & Sutton, R.I. (1993). Organizational behavior: Linking individuals and groups to organizational contexts. Annual Review of Psychology, 44: 195-229.
Murray, H.A. (193X). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.
71.
Nadler. D. & Tushman. M. (1988). Strategic Organizational design. Glenview, IL: Scott. Foresman & Co.
72.
Naylor, J.C., Pritchard. R.D. & Ilgen. D.R. (1980). A therory of behavior in organizations. New York: Academic Press.
73.
Nelson. D.L., Quick. J.C. & Joplin. J.R. (1991). Psychological contracting and newcomer socialization: An attachment theory foundation. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6(7): 55-72.
74.
Nicholson. N. & West. M.A. (1988). Managerial job change: Men and women and transition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
75.
O’Reilly. C. Ill. & Chatman. J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance. identification. and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 7/(3: 492-499.
76.
Pcrv, in. L.A. (1989). Person. situations. interactions: The history of a controversy and a discussion of theoretical models. Academy of Management Review.. 14: 350-360.
77.
Podsakoff. P.M. & Organ, D.W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12: 531-544.
78.
Porter, L.W. & Lawler. E.E. (1968). Managerial attitudes and performance. Homewood. IL: Dorsey Press.
79.
Rice. R.W.. McFarlin, D.B. & Bennett, D.E. (1989). Standards of comparison and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4): 591-598.
80.
Schneider, B. (1978). Person-situation selection: A review of some ability-situation interaction research. Personal Psychology, 31: 281-297.
81.
Schrieaheim. C. (1979). The similarity of individual-directed and group-directed leader behavior descriptions. Academy of Management Journal, 22: 345-355.
82.
Schwab. D.P. & Cumminp. L.L. (1970). Theories of performance and satisfaction: A review. Industrial Relations, 7: 408-430.
83.
Smith. M.J. & Robertson, I.T. (1989). Advances in selection and assessment. Chichester: Wiley.
84.
Sobel. R.S. (1978). Remote associations theory of creativity: Fifteen years later. Journal of Supplemental Abstract Services, MS17-35.
85.
Staw. B.M. (1984). Organizational behavior: A review and reformulation of the field’s outcome variables. Annual Review of Psychology.?5: 627-666.
86.
Sternberg. R.J. (1988). A three-facet model of creativity. Pp. 125-147 in R.J. Sternberg (ed.). The nature of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
87.
Super, D.E. (1957). The psychology of careers. New York: Harper and Row.
88.
Taylor. C.W. (1988). Various approaches to and definitions of creativity. Pp. 99-121 in R.J. Sternberg (ed.). The nature of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
89.
Tiaak. J. & Smith. C.S. (1994). Rejoinder to Edward’s comments. Journal of Management, 20: 691-694.
90.
Trocki. F. & Hurt. H.T. (1976). Communication variables affecting the adoption of a curriculum change in industrial arts education. Unpublished manuscript, West Virginia University.
91.
Tubba. M.E. (1986). Goal setting: A meta-analytic examination of empirical evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology7/: 474-483.
92.
Tziner. A. (1987). Congruency issue retested using Fineman’s achievement climation notion. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 2: 63-78.
93.
West, M.A. (1989). Innovation amongst health care professionals. Social Behaviour, 4: 173-184.
94.
West, M.A. & Farr. J.L. (1989). Innovation at work: Psychological perspective. Social Behaviour, 4: 15-30.
95.
Woodman, R.W., Sawyer, J.E. & Griffin. R.W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18: 293-321.
96.
Woodman, R.W. & Schoenfeldt, L.F. (1989). Individual differences in creativity: An interactionist perspective. Pp. 77-92 in J.A. Glover, R.R. Ronning & C.R. Reynolds (eds.), Handbook of creativity&. New York: Plenum.
