This paper employs a system dynamics-based framework to examine the limitations of experiential learning as a guide for decision-making in organizations. This framework departs from the more traditional approach to modelling experiential learning processes in organizations by emphasizing the systematic interaction between decision-making agents and their environments, rather than the effects of varying degrees of noise on performance. We present the results of a series of computer simulations that examined the consequences of adaptive learning in organizations by concentrating explicitly on the link between individual decisions and the system-level consequences generated by the interaction of individual choices. The results show that experience is a poor basis for learning primarily because the understanding of structural relations between individual actions and their aggregate consequences is confounded by nonlinear dynamics, time delays, and misperception of feedback.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Argote, L., Beckman, S. & Epple, D. (1990). The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Science, 36: 140-154.
2.
Balzer. W.K., Doherty, M.E. & O’Connor, R. (1989). Effects of cognitive feedback on performance. Psych&gical Bulletin, 106: 410-433.
3.
Binmore, K. (1992). Fun and games. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
4.
Brown, J.S. & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organization Science, 2: 40-57.
5.
Carley, K. (1992). Organizational learning and personnel turnover. Organizational Science, 3: 20-46.
6.
Cohen, M.D., March, J.G. & Olsen, P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17: 1-25.
7.
Cyert, R.N. & March, J.G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8.
Devaney, R.L. (1988). An introduction to chaotic dynamics. New York: Benjamin.
9.
Dorner, D. (1980). On the problems people have in dealing with complexity. Simulation and Games, 11: 87-97.
10.
Drazin, R. & Sandlands, L. (1992). Autogenesis: A perspective of the process of organizing. Organizatinal Science, 3: 230-249.
Ginsberg, A., Larsen, E. & Lomi, A. (1996). Generating strategy from individual behavior: A dynamic model of structural embeddedness. Pp. 121-147 in J.A.C. Baum & J.E. Dutton (eds.), Advances in strategic management. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
13.
Glynn, M.A., Lant, T.K. & Milliken, F.J. (1994). Mapping learning processesin organizations: A multi-level framework linking learning and organizations. Pp. 43-84 in C. Stubbart.J.R. Meindl & J.F. Porac (eds.), Advances in organizational cog&ion and organizational information processes. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
14.
Hannan, M.T. & Freeman, J. (1989). Organizational ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
Hedberg, B. (1981). How organizations learn and unlearn. Pp. 3-27 in P.C. Nystrom & W.H. Starbuck (eds.), Handbook of organizational design, Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
Hilbom, R.C. (1994). Chaos und nonlinear dynamics. New York: Oxford University Press
17.
Hogarth, R. (1980). Judgement and choice: The psychology of decision. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
18.
Jarmain, W.E. (1963). Problems in industrial dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
Kahneman, D., Slavic, P. & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Lant, T.K. (1994). Computer simulations of organizations as experiential learning systems: Implications for organization theory. Pp. 195-215 in K.Carley & M. Prietula (eds.), Computational Organization Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22.
Lant, T.K. & Mezias, S.J. (1990). Managing discontinuous change: A simulation study of organizational learning and entrepreneurial strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 11: 147-179.
23.
Lant, T.K. & Mezias, S.J. (1992). An organizational learning model of convergence and reorientation. Organizational Science, 3: 41-71.
24.
Levinthal, D. & March, J.G. (1981). A model of adaptive organizational search. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2: 307-333.
25.
Lounaama, P.H. & March, J.G. (1987). Adaptive coordination of a learning team. Management Science, 33: 107-123.
26.
Lyneis, J.M. (1982). Corporate planning and policy design: A system dynamics approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27.
Mahoney, J.T. (1992). The choice of organizational form: Vertical financial ownership versus other methods of vertical integration. Strategic Management Journal, 13: 559-584.
28.
Malmgren, H.B. (1961). Information, expectations, and the theory of the firm. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75: 399-421.
29.
March, J.G. (1989). Decisions and organizations. New York: Basil Blackwell.
30.
March, J.G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2; 71-87.
31.
March, J.G. & Olsen, J.P. (1976). Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Bergen, Norway: Universitetsforlage.
32.
March, J.G. & Simon, H.A. (1958). Organizations. New York: John Wiley.
33.
Mezias, S.J. & Glynn, M.A. (1993). The three faces of corporate renewal: Institution, revolution, and evolution. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 77-101.
34.
Mezias, S.J. & Glynn, M.A. (1995). Using computer simulations to understand the management of technology: Applications for theory development. Technology Studies, 2(2): 175-215.
35.
Mezias, S.J. & Lant, T.K. (1994). Mimetic learning and the evolution of organizational populations. Pp. 179-198 in J.A.C. Baum & J.V. Singh (eds.), Evolutionary dynamics of organizations. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
36.
Morecroft, J.D.W. (1983). A systems perspective on material requirements planning, Decision Science, 14(1): 301-320.
37.
Morecroft, J.D.W. (1988). System dynamics and microworlds for policy makers. Europeon Journal of Operational Research, 35(3): 301-320.
Mosekilde, E, Larsen, E.R. & Sterman, J.D. (1991). Coping with complexity: Deterministic chaos in human decision making behavior. Pp. 199-229 in J. Casti & A. Karlquist (eds.), Beyond belief: Randomness. prediction and explanation science. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
40.
Nelson, R. & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press.
41.
Porac, J.F., Thomas, H. & Baden-Fuller, C. (1989). Competitive groups as cognitive communities: The case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers. Journal of Management Studies, 26: 397-416.
42.
Rachlin, H. (1991). Introduction to modern behaviorism. New York: W.H. Freeman.
43.
Senge, P.M. (1990). The fifth discipline. New York: Doubleday.
44.
Stennan, J.D. (1989). Modelling managerial behavior: Misperception of feedback in dynamic decision making, Management Science, 3: 321-339.
45.
Thomsen, J.S., Mosekilde, E. & Sterman, J.D. (1992). Hyperchaotic phenomena in dynamic decision making. SAMS, 9: 137-156.
46.
Tushman, M.L. & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 3: 439-465.
47.
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, Science, 185: 1124-1131.
48.
Van Ackere, A., Larsen, E.R. & Morecroft, J.D.W. (1993). Systems thinking and business process redesign, European Management Journal, 11: 412-423.
49.
Wall. K. (1993). A model of decision making under bounded rationality. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 21: 331-352.
50.
Walsh, J. & Ungson, G. (1991). Organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, 16: 57-91.
51.
Weick, K.E. (1993). Sensemaking in organizations: Small structures with large consequences. Pp. 10-37 in J.K. Murnighan (Ed.) Social Psychology in Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
