The last century has been characterised by very fast industrialisation and population growth, causing strong outmigration from the rural territories, further increasing the socio-economic gap between the rural and urban areas. To counteract these problems, a lot of scholars have started studying rural development and the methodologies that could be applied to its evaluation. The main research objective of the present work is to investigate on a worldwide scale how rural development is being evaluated and, more in detail, to study the quantitative indicator-based approaches used for this kind of evaluation. Bibliometric analysis was performed with the aim of understanding in a better way the state of the scientific development of the research topic. Its duality, reflected by the nature of the phenomenon (negative or positive) from which the studies have origin from, has been confirmed. During the process of research has also encountered a new perspective – a more neutral one, with central concept the quality of life. Regarding the study of the quantitative indicator-based approaches, 47 selected papers have been analysed in detail and an extensive database containing 32 dimensions, 72 sub-dimensions and 892 indicators was created. Some universal dimensions and indicators have been encountered, although it cannot be known whether they are truly comparable due to the lack of transparency present in different research. For the future development and dissemination of these approaches, it is necessary to achieve greater transparency in how they are calculated and greater availability of open data.
AnheierHelmut K.ListRegina A.KnudsenEdward L.. 2023. “Advancing Governance Indicator Systems: Lessons Learned from the 2022 Symposium.” Global Policy14 (S4): 136–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13284
4.
AnokhinA. A.KuzinV. Yu.. 2019. “Approaches to Identifying the Periphery and Peripheralization in the Space of Modern Russia.” Regional Research of Russia9 (4): 311–317. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970519040026
5.
AtkočiūnienėVilmaKiaušienėIlona. 2015. “Lithuanian Regions by the Type of Rural Social Infrastructure.” In Proceedings of the 7th International Scientific Conference Rural Development 2015. Aleksandras Stulginskis University. https://doi.org/10.15544/RD.2015.118
6.
BenevenutoRodolfoCaulfieldBrian. 2020. “Measuring Access to Urban Centres in Rural Northeast Brazil: A Spatial Accessibility Poverty Index.” Journal of Transport Geography82: 102553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102553
7.
BertoliniPaolaPagliacciFrancesco. 2017. “Quality of Life and Territorial Imbalances. A Focus on Italian Inner and Rural Areas.” Bio-Based and Applied Economics6 (2).
BorsekovaKamilaKoronySamuelLawsonColin W.. 2024. “In Search of Key Performance Indicators of Regional Competitiveness in the European Union.” Journal of Regional Science64: 961–986. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12692
10.
CarlucciMargheritaGrigoriadisEfstathiosRontosKostasSalvatiLuca. 2017. “Revisiting a Hegemonic Concept: Long-Term ‘Mediterranean Urbanization’ in Between City Re-Polarization and Metropolitan Decline.” Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy10 (3): 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-016-9186-2
11.
CasiniLeonardoBoncinelliFabioContiniCaterinaGeriniFrancescaScozzafavaGabriele. 2019. “A Multicriteria Approach for Well-Being Assessment in Rural Areas.” Social Indicators Research143 (1): 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1978-0
12.
CerretaMariaPanaroSimonaPoliGiuliano. 2021. “A Spatial Decision Support System for Multifunctional Landscape Assessment: A Transformative Resilience Perspective for Vulnerable Inland Areas.” Sustainability13 (5): 2748. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052748
13.
ChampionTonyShepherdJohn. 2006. “Demographic Change in Rural England.” In The Ageing Countryside, the Growing Older Population of Rural England. Age Concern England.
14.
DadashpoorHashemKhalighiNina. 2016. “Investigating Spatial Distribution of Regional Quality of Life (RQoL) in Iran Between 1996 and 2011.” Social Indicators Research127 (3): 1217–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1001-y
15.
Dell’OvoMartaDezioCatherineMottadelliMartaOppioAlessandra. 2022. “How to Support Cultural Heritage-Led Development in Italian Inner Areas: A Multi-Methodological Evaluation Approach.” European Planning Studies, October, 31, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2135367
16.
DuquenneMarie-NoelleHadjouLamara. 2010. Theoretical and Methodological Approach of Fragile Areas: The Cases of Greek Regions Crossed by the Egnatia Road. Regional Science Inquiry.
17.
EderJakob. 2019. “Innovation in the Periphery: A Critical Survey and Research Agenda.” In International Regional Science Review. Sage Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017618764279
18.
FangFangMaLibangFanHaoCheXinglongChenMeimei. 2020. “The Spatial Differentiation of Quality of Rural Life Based on Natural Controlling Factors: A Case Study of Gansu Province, China.” Journal of Environmental Management264: 110439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110439
19.
GarlandiniSimoneTorricelliGian Paolo. 2017. “Services for Citizens in Peripheral Areas: A Hierarchy of Centrality Based on Their Availability and Accessibility.” IJPP – Italian Journal of Planning Practice7 (1).
HennebryBarraí. 2020. “The Determinants of Economic Resilience in Rural Regions. An Examination of the Portuguese Case.” Miscellanea Geographica24 (1): 24–29. https://doi.org/10.2478/mgrsd-2020-0001
22.
HindersahHAsyiawatiYAfiatiA. 2020. “Green Infrastructure Concept in Supporting Rural Development.” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering830 (3): 032074. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/830/3/032074
23.
HuQiuyunWangCheng. 2020. “Quality Evaluation and Division of Regional Types of Rural Human Settlements in China.” Habitat International105: 102278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102278
24.
KebzaMartin. 2018. “The Development of Peripheral Areas: The Case of West Pomeranian Voivodeship, Poland.” Moravian Geographical Reports26 (1): 69–81. https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2018-0006
25.
KebzaMartinPerottoCamilla Do Carmo. 2020. “Regional Development Trends in West Bohemia with a Special Focus on Peripheral Areas.” AUC Geographica55 (2): 243–254. https://doi.org/10.14712/23361980.2020.18
26.
KongLingyuXuXiaodongWangWeiWuJinxiuZhangMeiying. 2021. “Comprehensive Evaluation and Quantitative Research on the Living Protection of Traditional Villages from the Perspective of ‘Production–Living–Ecology.” Land10 (6): 570. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060570
27.
KubešJanKebzaMartin. 2018. “Geography of Socio-Economic Differentiation of Poland According to Subregions in 2002-2014.” AUC Geographica53 (1): 36–48. https://doi.org/10.14712/23361980.2018.4
28.
KullA.OjaT.ManderÜ.2006. “A Sensitivity Analysis of the European Union Coastal Zone Based on Environmental and Socio-Economic Sustainability Indicators.” In Management of Natural Resources, Sustainable Development and Ecological Hazards, 251–264. Southampton, UK: WIT Press. https://doi.org/10.2495/RAV060251
29.
KusioTomaszFioreMariantonietta. 2022. “Which Stakeholders’ Sector Matters in Rural Development? that Is the Problem.” Energies15 (2): 454. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020454
30.
LiHanbingJinXiaobinLiuJingFengDanyueXuWeiyiZhouYinkang. 2022a. “Analytical Framework for Integrating Resources, Morphology, and Function of Rural System Resilience—An Empirical Study of 386 Villages.” Journal of Cleaner Production365: 132738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132738
31.
LiHeHeHuaZhangJian. 2022b. “Study on Rural Development Evaluation and Drivers of Sustainable Development: Evidence from the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region of China.” Sustainability14 (15): 9570. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159570
32.
LiYajingHeJianhuaYueQiaobingKongXuesongZhangMiaomiao. 2022c. “Linking Rural Settlements Optimization with Village Development Stages: A Life Cycle Perspective.” Habitat International130: 102696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102696
33.
LiYuhengWestlundHansLiuYansui. 2019. “Why Some Rural Areas Decline while Some Others Not: An Overview of Rural Evolution in the World.” Journal of Rural Studies68: 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.03.003
34.
LiuShengGeJianBaiMingYaoMinHeLinyingChenMing. 2022. “Toward Classification-Based Sustainable Revitalization: Assessing the Vitality of Traditional Villages.” Land Use Policy116: 106060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106060
LiuYaqiuLiuJianGuoCanZhangTingtingWangAilingYuXinyang. 2021. “Identification of Villages’ Development Types Using a Comprehensive Natural–Socioeconomic Framework.” Sustainability13 (13): 7294. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137294
37.
LuShashaGuanXingliangYuDanlinDengYuZhouLinjie. 2015. “Multi-Scale Analysis of Regional Inequality Based on Spatial Field Model: A Case Study of China from 2000 to 2012.” ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information4 (4): 1982–2003. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi4041982
38.
MaCheZhangFangChen, et al.2019. “Rural Poverty Identification and Comprehensive Poverty Assessment Based on Quality-Of-Life: The Case of Gansu Province (China).” Sustainability11 (17): 4547. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174547
39.
MackElizabeth A.ScottLoveridgeKeeneThomasMannJohn. 2023. “A Review of the Literature about Broadband Internet Connections and Rural Development (1995-2022).” In International Regional Science Review. Sage Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/01600176231202457
40.
MarucciAlessandroFioriniLorenaDi DatoChiaraZulloFrancesco. 2020. “Marginality Assessment: Computational Applications on Italian Municipalities.” Sustainability12 (8): 3250. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083250
41.
MasiniEmanuelaTomaoAntonioBarbatiAnnaCoronaPiermariaSerraPereSalvatiLuca. 2019. “Urban Growth, Land-Use Efficiency and Local Socioeconomic Context: A Comparative Analysis of 417 Metropolitan Regions in Europe.” Environmental Management63 (3): 322–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1119-1
42.
MorettoValentinoEliaGianlucaSchirinziSaraVizziRobertoGhianiGianpaolo. 2022. “A Knowledge Visualization Approach to Identify and Discovery Inner Areas: A Pilot Application in the Province of Lecce.” Management Decision60 (4): 1132–1158. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2021-0104
43.
MuiluToivoRusanenJarmo. 2003. “Rural Young People in Regional Development—The Case of Finland in 1970-2000.” Journal of Rural Studies19 (3): 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(03)00003-2
44.
MurgašFrantišekKlobučníkMichal. 2016. “Municipalities and Regions as Good Places to Live: Index of Quality of Life in the Czech Republic.” Applied Research in Quality of Life11 (2): 553–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-014-9381-8
45.
MurrayAlan T.GrubesicTony H.2019. “Evolving Regional Analytics in a Rural World.” International Regional Science Review42 (5-6): 374–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017619827071
46.
SemenovaNickolaevnaNadezhdaBusalovaSvetlana GenadievnaEreminaOlga IvanovnaMakeikinaSvetlana MikhailovnaIvanovaIrina Anatolievna. 2016. “Assessment of Sustainable Development of Rural Areas of Russia.” Indian Journal of Science and Technology9 (14). https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i14/91518
47.
Ochoa-RicoMaría-SaloméJimber-del-RíoJuan-AntonioCornejo-MarcosGinoVergara-RomeroArnaldo. 2022. “Characterization of the Territory and Estimation of a Synthetic Index of Social Welfare.” TEM Journal11 (3).1254–1264. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM113-34
48.
PalmisanoOttomano GiovanniSardaroRuggieroSalaPiermichele La. 2022. “Recovery and Resilience of the Inner Areas: Identifying Collective Policy Actions through PROMETHEE II.” Land11 (8): 1181. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11081181
49.
PacioneMichael. 2009. Urban Geography: A Global Perspective. Routledge: Routledge.
50.
ParshukovD VShaporovaZ EKoloskovaYu I. 2021a. “Study of the Socio-Economic Living Conditions of the Rural Population of the Krasnoyarsk Territory.” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science677 (2): 022051. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/677/2/022051
51.
ParshukovD VShaporovaZ EKoloskovaYu I. 2021b. “Quality of Life of the Rural Population of the Krasnoyarsk Territory: Assessment, Trends and Priorities.” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science839 (2): 022096. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/839/2/022096
52.
PartridgeMark D.RickmanDan S.. 2005. “High-Poverty Nonmetropolitan Counties in America: Can Economic Development Help?” International Regional Science Review28: 415–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017605278998
53.
PénzesJánosDemeterGábor. 2021. “Peripheral Areas and Their Distinctive Characteristics: The Case of Hungary.” Moravian Geographical Reports29 (3): 217–230. https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2021-0016
54.
PerchinunnoPaolad’OvidioFrancesco D.RotondoFrancesco. 2019. “Identification of ‘Hot Spots’ of Inner Areas in Italy: Scan Statistic for Urban Planning Policies.” Social Indicators Research143 (3): 1299–1317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-2005-1
55.
PopescuClaudiaSoaitaAdriana MihaelaPersuMihaela Rodica. 2021. “Peripheralitysquared: Mapping the Fractal Spatiality of Peripheralization in the Danube Region of Romania.” Habitat International107: 102306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102306
56.
RolandoDianaRebaudengoManuelaBarrecaAlice. 2022a. “Exploring the Resilience of Inner Areas: A Cross-Dimensional Approach to Bring Out Territorial Potentials.”. https://www-scopus-com-s.web.bisu.edu.cn
57.
RolandoDianaRebaudengoManuelaBarrecaAlice. 2022b. “Managing Knowledge to Enhance Fragile Territories: Resilient Strategies for the Alta Valsesia Area in Italy.” In Lugano: IFKAD 2022 - Knowledge Drivers for Resilience and Transformation, June 20-22, 2022, Lugano, Switzerland.
58.
RossittiMarcoDell’OvoMartaOppioAlessandraTorrieriFrancesca. 2021. “The Italian National Strategy for Inner Areas (SNAI): A Critical Analysis of the Indicator Grid.” Sustainability13 (12): 6927. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126927
59.
Sánchez-ZamoraPedroGallardo-CobosRosa. 2019. “Diversity, Disparity and Territorial Resilience in the Context of the Economic Crisis: An Analysis of Rural Areas in Southern Spain.” Sustainability11 (6): 1743. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061743
60.
ŠimonMartin. 2017. “Multi-Scalar Geographies of Polarisation and Peripheralisation: A Case Study of Czechia.” Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series37 (37): 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1515/bog-2017-0029
61.
StankulovaAlexandraBarrecaAliceRebaudengoManuelaRolandoDiana. 2023. “Emerging Trends in the Territorial and Rural Vulnerability-Vibrancy Evaluation. A Bibliometric Analysis.” In ICCSA 2023, LNCS, July 3–6, 2023, Athens, Greece.
62.
ToniAndrea DeVizzarriMatteoDi FebbraroMirkoBrunoLasserreNogueraJoanMartinoPaolo Di. 2021. “Aligning Inner Peripheries with Rural Development in Italy: Territorial Evidence to Support Policy Contextualization.” Land Use Policy100: 104899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104899
63.
TretyakovаL. A.LavrikovaN. I.. 2012. “Quality of Life of the Population as an Indicator of Sustainable Development of Rural Territories.” Economy of Region/Ekonomika Regiona3.
64.
TrovatoMaria RosaNascaLudovica. 2022. “An Axiology of Weak Areas: The Estimation of an Index of Abandonment for the Definition of a Cognitive Tool to Support the Enhancement of Inland Areas in Sicily.” Land11 (12): 2268. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11122268
65.
United Nations. 2019. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision. New York: United Nations.
66.
VendemmiaBrunaPucciPaolaBeriaPaolo. 2021. “An Institutional Periphery in Discussion. Rethinking the Inner Areas in Italy.” Applied Geography135: 102537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2021.102537
67.
ViccaroMauroRomanoSeverinoPreteCarmelinaCozziMario. 2021. “Rural Planning? an Integrated Dynamic Model for Assessing Quality of Life at a Local Scale.” Land Use Policy111: 105742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105742
68.
WangYaYangYanmei. 2020. “Research on Rural Development Innovation and Development Based on Big Data.” In 2020 International Conference on Big Data, Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things Engineering (ICBAIE), 83–86. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBAIE49996.2020.00024
69.
WangYanhuiChiYao. 2018. “Measuring Spatiotemporal Changes of Rural Basic Public Service in Poverty-Stricken Area of China.” International Regional Science Review41 (5): 510–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017616665671
70.
YuruiLiQiaoLuyinQianyiWangKarácsonyiDávid. 2020. “Towards the Evaluation of Rural Livability in China: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Case Study.” Habitat International105: 102241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102241
71.
ZangYuzhuLiuYansuiYangYuanyuanWoodsMichaelFoisFrancesca. 2020. “Rural Decline or Restructuring? Implications for Sustainability Transitions in Rural China.” Land Use Policy94: 104531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104531
72.
ZhangJingHuangBingbingChenXinmingZhuCongmouGanMuye. 2022. “Multidimensional Evaluation of the Quality of Rural Life Using Big Data from the Perspective of Common Prosperity.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health19 (21): 14166. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114166
73.
ZhenLinCaoShuyanWeiYunjieDillyOliverLiuXuelinLiFenKoenigHannesTscherningKarenHelmingKatharina. 2009. “Comparison of Sustainability Issues in Two Sensitive Areas of China.” Environmental Science & Policy12 (8): 1153–1167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2009.03.002
74.
ZhouQiuyangLiZhenqiang. 2021. “The Impact of Industrial Structure Upgrades on the Urban–Rural Income Gap: An Empirical Study Based on China’s Provincial Panel Data.” Growth and Change52 (3): 1761–1782. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12502
75.
ZolinM. BrunaFerrettiPaolaGrandiMirco. 2020. “Sustainability in Peripheral and Ultra-peripheral Rural Areas through a Multi-Attribute Analysis: The Case of the Italian Insular Region.” Sustainability (Switzerland)12 (22): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229380
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
