Since the first U.S. state adopted the Research and Development (R&D) tax credit in the early 1980s, the policy has spread to most of the other states. The diffusion continues with numerous modifications and enhancements to the basic R&D tax credit. This study examines the diffusion of the R&D investment tax credit using event history analysis supported by qualitative research. The conclusions of the research are that the R&D tax credit is an economic development approach associated with an existing manufacturing base and implementation is aided by political factors. Adjacent state competition does not appear to lead toward adoption. Applying these findings to the current literature on the effectiveness of the state R&D tax credits highlights the need for thorough policy evaluation before the adoption of tax credits as part of an economic development program.
BaileyMartinLawrenceRobert. 1992. Tax incentives for R&D: What do the data tell us?Washington, DC: Council on Research and Technology.
2.
BeamerGlenn. 2005. Making work pay: State creation of refundable tax credits in the post-welfare reform era. Chicago: Midwestern Political Science Association.
3.
BerryFrances S.BerryWilliam D.1990. State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis. American Political Science Review84(2):395–415.
4.
BerryFrances S.BerryWilliam D.1992. Tax innovation in the states: Capitalizing on political opportunity. American Journal of Political Science36(3):715–41.
5.
BerryFrances S.BerryWilliam D.1999. Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In Theories of the policy process, ed. SabatierP. A.. Boulder, CO: Westview.
6.
BerryFrances S.BerryWilliam D.2007. Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In Theories of the policy process, ed. SabatierP. A.. Boulder, CO: Westview.
7.
BillingsB. Anthony. 2003. Are U.S. tax incentives for corporate R&D likely to motivate American firms to perform research abroad? Tax Executive55(4):291–97.
8.
BillingsB. Anthony. 2007. States’ tax credits for company-financed research: A current comparison. CPA Journal207:40–45.
9.
BillingsB. AnthonyGlazunovSergeiHoustonMelvin. 2001. The role of taxes in corporate research and development spending. R&D Management31(4):465–77.
10.
BloomNickGriffithRachelVan ReenenJohn. 2002. Do R&D tax credits work? Evidence from a panel of countries 1979-1997. Journal of Public Economics85(1):1–31.
11.
BlossfeldHans-PeterRohwerGotz. 2002. Techniques of event history modeling new approaches to causal analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
BoeckelmanK.1991. Political culture and state development policy. Publius21(2):49–62.
13.
BoehmkeFrederick J.WitmerRichard. 2004. Disentangling diffusion: The effects of social learning and economic competition on state policy innovation and expansion. Political Research Quarterly57(1):39–51.
BussT. F. 2001. The effect of state tax incentives on economic growth and firm location decisions: An overview of the literature. Economic Development Quarterly15(1):90–105.
16.
ChirinkoRobert S.WilsonDaniel J.2007. State investment tax incentives: A zero-sum game?Journal of Public Economics92(12):2, 362–62, 384.
17.
ChirinkoRobert S.WilsonDaniel J.2009. Tax competition among U.S. states: Racing to the bottom or riding on a seesaw? Working paper 2008-03, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
18.
ClarkJillFrenchJ. Lawrence. 1984. Innovation and program content in state tax policies. State & Local Government Review16(1):11–16.
19.
ClausenTommy Hoyvarde. 2007. Do subsidies have positive impacts on R&D and innovation activities at the firm level? TIK Working Paper on Innovation Studies No. 20070615, University of Oslo, Norway.
20.
CordesJoseph J.1989. Tax incentives and R&D spending: A review of the evidence. Research Policy18(3):119–33.
21.
Council of State Governments & American Legislators’ Association. 2008. The book of the states. Lexington, KY: Council of State Governments.
22.
CroneTheodore. 2005. An alternative definition of economic regions in the United States based on similarities in state business cycles. Review of Economics and Statistics87(4):617–26.
23.
DardenneJay. 2009. Personal communication regarding HB 106/SB 96 research and development tax credits. Baton Rouge, LA.
24.
Department of Taxation State of Hawaii. 2007. Report on the operations of qualified high technology businesses from 2002 through 2006. Honolulu: State of Hawaii.
25.
DozYvesWilsonKeelyVeldhoenStevenGoldbrunnerThomasAltmanGeorg. 2006. Innovation: Is global the way forward?New York: Booz Allen Hamilton and INSEAD.
26.
EisnerRobertAlbertSteven H.SullivanMartin A.. 1984. The new incremental tax credit for R&D: Incentive or disincentive. National Tax Journal37(2):171–83.
27.
FeiockRichard C.2004. Metropolitan governance: Conflict, competition and cooperation. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
28.
GittellRossTebaldiEdinaldo. 2007. The economic impacts of a proposed R&D tax credit in New Hampshire. Durham: University of New Hampshire Whittemore School of Business and Economics.
29.
GittellRossTebaldiEdinaldo. 2008. Are research and development tax credits effective? The economic impacts of a R&D tax credit in New Hampshire. Public Finance & Management8(1):70–101.
30.
GradyD. O. 1987. State economic development incentives: Why do states compete? State & Local Government Review19(3):86–94.
31.
Grant Thornton LLP. 2007. Hawaii high technology research and development tax credit survey. Honolulu, HI: Grant Thornton.
32.
GrayVirginia. 1994. Innovation in the states: A diffusion study. In New perspectives on American politics, ed. DoddL.JillisonC.. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
33.
HallBronwyn. 1993. R&D tax policy during the eighties: Success or failure?Tax Policy and the Economy7:36.
34.
HallBronwyn. 1995. The effectiveness of research and experimental tax credits: Critical literature review and research design. Washington, DC: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment.
35.
HallBronwynVan ReenenJohn. 2000. How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? A review of the evidence. Research Policy29(4/5): 449–69.
36.
HallBronwynWosinkaMarta. 1999a. The California R&D tax credit: Description, history, and economic analysis. Sacramento: California Council on Science and Technology.
37.
HallBronwynWosinkaMarta. 1999b. Effectiveness of the California R&D tax credit: A report. Berkeley: California Council on Science and Technology.
38.
HansenSusan. 1983. The politics of taxation. New York: Praeger.
39.
HansonR. L. 1991. Political cultural variations in state economic development policy. Publius21(2):63–81.
40.
HansonR. L. 1993. Bidding for business: A second war between the states? Economic Development Quarterly7(2):183–98.
41.
HaysScottGlickHenry. 1997. The role of agenda setting in policy innovation: An event history analysis of living-will laws. American Politics Quarterly25:497–516.
42.
HerreraPatricia. 2002. States tweak incentive programs for high-tech endeavors.
43.
KarchAndrew. 2007. Emerging issues and future directions in state policy diffusion research. State Politics & Policy Quarterly7(1):54–80.
44.
KlassenKennethPittmanJefferyReedMargaret. 2004. A cross-national comparison of R&D expenditure decisions: Tax incentives and financial constraints. Contemporary Accounting Research21(3):639–80.
45.
MamuneasTheofanis P.NadiriIshaq. 1996. Public R&D policies and cost behavior of the US manufacturing industries. Journal of Public Economics63(1):57–81.
46.
MansfieldEdwin. 1986. The R&D tax credit and other technology policy issues. American Economic Review76:4.
47.
MansfieldEdwinSwitzerLorne. 1985. The effects of R&D tax credits and allowances in Canada. Research Policy14(2):97–107.
48.
McCutchenWilliam W.1993. Estimating the impact of the R&D tax credit on strategic groups in the pharmaceutical industry. Research Policy22(4):337–51.
49.
MillerChadMaloneKen. 2008. Competing for high growth businesses: Tradable R&D tax credits. Hattiesburg, MS: Trent Lott National Center for Excellence in Economic Development & Entrepreneurship.
50.
MooneyC. Z. 2001. Modeling regional effects on state policy diffusion. Political Research Quarterly54(1):103–24.
51.
MossbergerKaren. 2000. The politics of ideas and the spread of enterprise zones. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
NiceDavid C.1994. Property tax relief in policy innovation in state government. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
54.
PaffLolita. 2005. State-level R&D tax credits: A firm-level analysis. Topics in Economic Analysis & Policy5 (1).
55.
RashkinMichael D.2007. Practical guide to research and development tax incentives: Federal, state, and foreign. Chicago: CCH.
56.
State Science and Technology Institute. 1997. State research and development tax incentives. Columbus, OH: SSTI.
57.
StoutenboroughJames W.BeverlinMatthew. 2008. Encouraging pollution-free energy: The diffusion of state net metering policies. Social Science Quarterly89:1230–51.
58.
TillingerJanet W.1991. An analysis of the effectiveness of the research and experimentation tax credit in a q model of valuation. Journal of the American Taxation Association13(2):1.
59.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2008a. State government tax collections. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
60.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2008b. Statistical abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis. 2008b. State annual personal income. http://www.bea.gov/regional/spi/(accessed Nove-mber 15, 2008).
Van den BergGerard. 2001. Duration models: Specification, identification and multiple durations. In Handbook of econometrics, ed. HeckmanJ.LeamerE. E.. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
65.
VoldenCraigTingMichael M.CarpenterDaniel P.. 2008. A formal model of learning and policy diffusion. American Political Science Review102(3):319–32.
66.
WardaJack. 2006. Tax treatment of investment in intellectual assets: An international comparison. Working paper 4, OECD Science Technology and Industry, Paris.
67.
WheelerLaura. 2005. The research and development tax credit in Georgia. Original ed., FRC Report No. 111, Georgia State University.
68.
WilsonDaniel. 2005. The rise and spread of state R&D tax credits. FRBSF Economic Letter2005(26):1–3.
69.
WilsonDaniel. 2007. Beggar thy neighbor? The in-state, out-of-state, and aggregate effects of R&D tax credits. Original ed. San Francisco: Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
70.
WilsonDaniel. 2009. Beggar thy neighbor? The in-state, out-of-state, and aggregate effects of R&D tax credits. Review of Economics and Statistics91(2):431–36.
71.
WuYonghong. 2005. The effects of state R&D tax credits in stimulating private R&D expenditure: A cross-state empirical analysis. Journal of Policy Analysis & Management24(4):785–802.
72.
WuYonghong. 2008. State R&D tax credits and high-technology establishments. Economic Development Quarterly22(2):136–48.
73.
YamaguchiKazuo. 1991. Event history analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
