Drawing on the influential global cities paradigm, this article derives three hypotheses about the future of organized labor in major urban centers of the advanced capitalist world. Hypotheses are structured around Erik Olin Wright’s concepts of structural and associational power, plus that of employer power, and explored through comparative analyses of the last three strikes by New York City transit workers in 2005, 1980, and 1966. Examination of these conflicts supports two global cities predictions about the evolution of workers’ power in major urban centers while contradicting doomsday arguments about a supposed one-way decline of workers’ power.
BarnumDarold T.1971. “From Private to Public: Labor Relations in Urban Transit.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review1(1971): 95-115.
2.
BraudelFernand. 1983. The Perspective of the World. New York: Collins.
3.
BrennerNeil. 1998. “Global Cities, Glocal States: Global City Formation and State Territorial Restructuring in Contemporary Europe.” Review of International Political Economy1(1998): 1-37.
4.
BursteinPaul. 1985. Discrimination, Jobs, and Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
ClawsonDan. 2003. The Next Upsurge: Labor and the New Social Movements. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
6.
ChunJennifer Jihye. 2009. Organizing at the Margins: The Symbolic Politics of Labor in South Korea and the United States. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
7.
DavisMike. 1999. Prisoners of the American Dream: Politics and Economy in the History of the US Working Class. New York: Verso.
8.
FainsteinSusan S.2001. “Inequality in Global-City Regions,” Global City-Regions: Theory, Trends, Policy, ed. ScottAllen J. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001).
9.
FineJanice. 2006. Workers’ Centers: Organizing Communities at the Edge of the Dream. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
10.
FreemanJoshua B.1989. In Transit: The Transport Workers Union in New York City, 1933–1966. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
FreemanJoshua B.2000. Working-Class New York: Life and Labor since World War II. New York: New Press.
12.
FreemanJoshua B.2006. “Anatomy of a Strike: New York City Transit Workers Confront the Power Elite.” New Labor Forum3(2006): 9-19.
13.
FriedmannJohnWolffGoetz. 1982. “World City Formation: An Agenda for Research and Action.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research6(1982): 309-44.
14.
FriedmannJohn. 1986. “The World City Hypothesis.” Development and Change17(1986): 69-83.
15.
HarveyDavid. 1999. The Limits to Capital. New York: Verso.
16.
HarveyDavid. 2005. The New Imperialism. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
HortonRaymond D.1970. “Municipal Labor Relations in New York City.” Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science2(1970): 68-80.
KeilRoger. 1998. “Globalization Makes States: Perspectives of Local Governance in the Age of the World City.” Review of International Political Economy4(1998): 616-46.
20.
LopezSteven Henry. 2004. Reorganizing the Rustbelt: An Inside Study of the American Labor Movement. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
21.
MacDonaldIan Thomas. 2010. “Exceptional New York? Variations in Neoliberal Labour Relations at the Urban Scale.” Global Labour Journal2(2010): 233-64.
22.
MilkmanRuth, ed. 2000. Organizing Immigrants: The Challenge for Unions in Contemporary California. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
23.
MilkmanRuth. 2006. L.A. Story: Immigrant Workers and the Future of the US Labor Movement. New York: Russell Sage.
24.
MollenkopfJohn H.1983. The Contested City. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
MoodyKim. 1997. Workers in a Lean World: Unions in the International Economy. New York: Haymarket.
26.
MoodyKim. 2007a. US Labor in Trouble and Transition: The Failure of Reform from Above, the Promise of Revival from Below. New York: Verso.
27.
MoodyKim. 2007b. From Welfare State to Real Estate: Regime Change in New York City, 1974 to Present. New York: New Press.
28.
NessImmanuel. 2005. Immigrants, Unions, and the New US Labor Market. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
29.
New York Chamber of Commerce. 1966. The New York City Economy: An Overview, Trends. On reserve at the New York Public Library.
30.
New York State Department of Labor. 2005. Quarterly Census for Employment and Wages (QCEW). http://www.labor.ny.gov/stats/ins.asp (accessed April 28, 2010).
31.
NørgaardHelle. 2003. “The Global City Thesis—Social Polarization and Changes in the Distribution of Wages.” Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography2(2003): 103-19.
32.
Office of the New York State Comptroller. 1980. “Report on Revenues and the City Economy.” May7.
33.
PerroneLucaWrightEric OlinGriffinLarry T. “Positional Power, Strikes, and Wages.” American Sociological Review3(1984): 412-26.
SassenSaskia. 2001. The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo, 2nd ed.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
SassenSaskia. 2006. Cities in a World Economy, 3rd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
37.
ScottAllen J.1988. New Industrial Spaces. London: Pion.
38.
SilverBeverly. 2003. Forces of Labor: Workers’ Movements and Globalization since 1870. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39.
StorperMichaelWalkerDavid. 1983. “The Labor Theory of Location.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research1(1983): 1-41.
40.
StorperMichaelWalkerRichard. 1989. The Capitalist Imperative: Territory, Technology, and Industrial Growth. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
41.
TaylorPeterNiPengfeiDerudderBenHoylerMichaelWitloxFrankHuangJin, eds. 2010. Global Urban Analysis: A Survey of Cities in Globalization. London: Earthscan.
42.
TonelsonAlan. 2002. The Race to the Bottom: Why a Worldwide Worker Surplus and Uncontrolled Free Trade Are Sinking American Living Standards. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
43.
TrejoStephen J. “Public Sector Unions and Municipal Employment.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review1(1991): 166-80.
VossKimShermanRachel. 2003. “You Can’t Just Do It Automatically: The Transition to Social Movement Unionism in the United States.” In Trade Unions in Renewal: A Comparative Study, ed. FairbrotherPeterYatesCharlotte A. B.New York: Routledge.
47.
WrightErik Olin. 2000. “Working-Class Power, Capitalist-Class Interests, and Class Compromise.” American Journal of Sociology4(2000): 957-1002.
