Framing,Persuasion,Messaging,and Messengers

Abstract

The New Jersey Death Penalty Abolition Movement (DPAM) developed a pragmatic strategy that effectively communicated the argument for replacing capital punishment with life without parole, and the state of New Jersey repealed the death penalty by legislative action, on December 17, 2007. This case study analyzes the issue frames and messages used by the movement, and the possible lessons for movements in other states working to repeal the death penalty. Interviews with key stakeholders in the movement indicated which frames were used most frequently and effectively. Implications for the broader DPAM nationally include the power of the issue frames of murder victims’ families who oppose the death penalty, innocent people on death row, and law enforcement opposition to the death penalty, among others.

Keywords

death penalty abolition social movement framing messaging

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baumgartner

Frank

Jones

Bryan

. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Benford

Robert

Snow

David

. 2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 26:611–39.

Braun

Bob

. 2007. “He’s Got a Right to Say the Death Penalty Is Wrong.” The Star Ledger, November 19, 13.

Chomsky

Noam

. 2007. What We Say Goes. New York: Metropolitan.

Chong

Dennis

. 1993. “How People Think, Reason, and Feel About Rights and Liberties.” American Journal of Political Science 37:867–99.

Dardis

Frank

Baumgartner

Frank

Boydstun

Amber

Boef

Suzanna De

Shen

Fuyuan

. 2008. “Media Framing of Capital Punishment and its Impact on Individuals’ Cognitive Responses.” Mass Communication and Society 11:115–40.

Death Penalty Information Center. 2014a. Retrieved May 26, 2014 (http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/abolitionist-and-retentionist-countries).

Death Penalty Information Center. 2014b. Retrieved May 26, 2014 (http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/states-and-without-death-penalty).

Death Penalty Information Center. 2014c. Retrieved May 26, 2014 (http://deathpenaltyinfo.org/documents/YearEnd2013.pdf).

10.

Death Penalty Information Center. 2014d. Retrieved June 4, 2014 (http://deathpenaltyinfo.org/national-polls-and-studies).

11.

Death Penalty Information Center. 2014e. Retrieved June 4, 2014 (http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/new-jersey-1), (http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/death-sentences-united-states-1977-2008), and (http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/legislative-activity-new-jersey).

12.

Death Penalty Information Center. 2014f. Retrieved June 4, 2014 (http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/number-executions-state-and-region-1976).

13.

Eagly

Alice

Chaiken

Shelly

. 1995. “Attitude Strength, Attitude Structure, and Resistance to Change.” Pp. 413–32 in Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences, edited by Petty

Krosnick

. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

14.

Edwards

Kari

Smith

Edward

. 1996. “A Disconfirmation Bias in the Evaluation of Arguments.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71:5–24.

15.

Fitzgerald

Celeste

. 2008. Personal interview, February 1, 2008. Director of New Jerseyans for Alternatives to the Death Penalty.

16.

Forsberg

Mary

. 2005. “Money for Nothing? The Financial Cost of New Jersey’s Death Penalty.” Retrieved May 10, 2012 (http://www.sentencing.nj.gov/downloads/pdf/articles/death3.pdf).

17.

Gallo-Cruz

Salina

. 2012. “Negotiating the Lines of Contention: Counterframing and Boundary Work in the School of the Americas Debate.” Sociological Forum 27:21–45.

18.

Gamson

William

. 1992. Talking Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

19.

Haines

Herbert

. 1996. Against Capital Punishment: The Anti-death Penalty Movement in America, 1972-1994. New York: Oxford University Press.

20.

Johnston

Hank

Noakes

John

, eds. 2005. Frames of Protest: Social Movements and the Framing Perspective. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

21.

Knight

Graham

Greenberg

Josh

. 2011. “Talk of the Enemy: Adversarial Framing and Climate Change Discourse.” Social Movement Studies 10:323–40.

22.

Lithwick

Dahlia

. 2010. “The Life of a Death Penalty Lawyer.” The New York Times Sunday Book Review, February 11. Retrieved June 1, 2014 (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/14/books/review/Lithwick-t.html?_r=1).

23.

Lord

Charles

Ross

Lee

Lepper

Mark

. 1979. “Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37:2098–109.

24.

Adrienne

. 2008. “New Jersey is a Leading Liberal State.” The Philadelphia Inquirer, April 11 Retrieved July 31, 2014 (search.proquest.com.ezaccess.libraries.psu.edu/docview/465527491/F48B910826A842F6PQ/2?accountid=13158).

25.

Marx

Karl

Engels

Friedrich

. (1848) 2008. The Communist Manifesto. New York: Pathfinder.

26.

McAdam

Doug

McCarthy

John

Zald

Mayer

, eds. 1996. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. New York: Cambridge University Press.

27.

McCammon

Holly

. 2012. “Explaining Frame Variation: More Moderate and Radical Demands for Women’s Citizenship in the U.S. Women’s Jury Movements.” Social Problems 59:43–69.

28.

Nelson

Thomas

Kinder

Donald

. 1996. “Issues Frames and Group-centrism in American Public Opinion.” The Journal of Politics 58:1055–78.

29.

Nelson

Thomas

Oxley

Zoe

. 1999. “Issue Framing Effects on Belief Importance and Opinion.” The Journal of Politics 61:1040–67.

30.

New Jersey Legislature. 2012. “New Jersey Death Penalty Study Commission.” Retrieved March 10, 2012 (http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/committees/njdeath_penalty.asp).

31.

Patton

Michael

. 2001. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

32.

Perloff

Richard

. 1993. The Dynamics of Persuasion. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

33.

Peters

Jeremy

. 2007. “Corzine Signs Bill Ending Executions, Then Commutes Sentences of 8.” The New York Times, December 18, B3.

34.

Smith

Jackie

. 2002. “Globalizing Resistance: The Battle of Seattle and the Future of Social Movements.” Pp. 208–21 in Globalization and Resistance, edited by Smith

Johnston

. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

35.

Snow

David

Benford

Robert

. 1992. “Master Frames and Cycles of Protest.” Pp. 133–55 in Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, edited by Morris

Mueller

. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

36.

Tarrow

Sidney

. 1998. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.

37.

Tilly

Charles

. 1995. Popular Contention in Great Britain, 1758-1834. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.