BellahRobert N.1983. “The ethical aims of social inquiry.” Pp. 360–381 in HaanNorma, BellahRobert N., RabinowPaul, and SullivanWilliam M. (eds.), Social Science as Moral Inquiry.New York: Columbia University Press.
3.
BlumAlan1974. “Positive thinking”Theory and Society1: 245–269.
4.
BlumAlan1977Criticalness and traditional prejudice. Canadian Journal of Sociology. (Winter): 97–126.
5.
ColemanJames S.1972. Policy Research in the Social Sciences.Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
6.
ColemanJames S.1975. “Social structure and a theory of action.” Pp. 76–93 In BlauPeter M. (ed.), Approaches to the Study of Social Structure.New York: Free Press.
7.
HabermasJurgen1976A positivistically bisected rationalism, Pp. 198–225 in AdornoTheodor W.The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology. (Tr. Glyn Adey, David Frisby.) New York: Harper and Row.
8.
HabermasJurgen1971. Knowledge and Human Interests. (Tr. Jeremy J. Shapiro.) Boston: Beacon.
9.
HenrichDieter1972. “Discussion.” Pp. 66–71, in StammerOtto (ed.), Max Weber and Sociology Today.New York: Harper and Row.
10.
HirschmanAlbert O.1983. “Morality and the Social Sciences” Pp. 21–32 in HaanNorma, BellahRobert N., RabinowPaul, and SullivanWilliam M. (eds.), Social Science as Moral Inquiry.New York: Columbia University Press.
11.
KuhnThomas S.1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
LundbergGeorge A.1947. Can Science Save Us?New York: McKay.
13.
McGuireSteven1982. “Moral relativism and Habermas,”ALSA Forum6(1): 23–31.
14.
McHughPeter, RaffelStanley, FossDaniel C., and BlumAlan F.1974. On the Beginning of Social Inquiry.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
15.
RortyRichard1983. “Method and Morality.” Pp. 155–176 in HaanNorma, BellahRobert N., RabinowPaul, and SullivanWilliam M. (eds.), Social Science as Moral Inquiry.New York: Columbia University Press.
16.
ScheffThomas J.1966. Being Mentally Ill.Chicago: Aldine.
