AdelmanH., & TaylorL. (2000). Looking at school health and school reform policy through the lens of addressing barriers to learning. Children's Services: Social Policy, Research, & Practice, 3, 117–132.
2.
BensonL., & HarkavyI. (2003). The role of the American research university in advancing system-wide education reform, democratic schooling, and democracy. In this volume— BrabeckM.M., WalshM.E., & LattaR. (Eds.), Meeting at the hyphen: Schools-universities-communities-professions in collaboration for student achievement and well being. The 102nd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
3.
BlankM., HaleE., HousmanN., KaufmannB., MartinezM., McCloudB., Sam-bergL., WalterS., & MelavilleA. (2001). School-community partnerships in support of student learning: Taking a second look at the governance of the 21st Century Community Learning Center Program.Washington, DC: The Institute for Educational Leadership.
4.
BrabeckM., WalshM., KennyM., & ComilangK. (1997). Interprofessional collaboration for children and families: Opportunities for counseling psychology in the 21st century. The Counseling Psychologist, 25, 615–636.
5.
Briar-LawsonK., LawsonH., HennonC., & JonesA. (2001). Family-supportive policy practice: International perspectives.New York: Columbia University Press.
6.
BronsteinL. (in press). The index of interdisciplinary collaboration: The design and development of an assessment instrument. Social Work.
7.
CahnE. (2000). No more throw-away people: The co-production imperative.Washington, DC: Essential Books.
8.
ChrislipD., & LarsonC. (1994). Collaborative leadership: How citizens and civic leaders can make a difference.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9.
CorriganD. (2000). The changing role of schools and higher education institutions with respect to community-based interagency collaboration and interprofessional partnerships. Peabody Journal of Education, 75, 176–195.
10.
CoserL. (1956). The functions of social conflict.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
11.
CrowsonR. (1998). Community empowerment and the public schools: Can educational professionalism survive?Peabody Journal of Education, 73(1), 56–68.
12.
CrowsonR. (2003). Empowerment models for interprofessional collaboration. In this volume— BrabeckM.M., WalshM.E., & LattaR. (Eds.), Meeting at the hyphen: Schools-universities-communities-professions in collaboration for student achievement and well being. The 102nd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
13.
CrowsonR., & BoydW. (1996). Achieving coordinated school-linked services: Facilitating utilization of the emerging knowledge base. Educational Policy, 10, 253–272.
14.
Delgado-GaitanC. (2002). The power of community: Mobilizing for family and schooling.New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
15.
DeschenesS., CubanL., & TyackD. (2001). Mismatch: Historical perspectives on schools and students who don't fit them. Teachers College Record, 4, 525–547.
16.
DriscollM.E. (2001). The sense of place and the neighborhood school: Implications for building social capital and for community development. In CrowsonR. (Ed.), Community development and school reform (pp. 19–42). Oxford, U.K.: Elsevier Science, Ltd.
17.
DryfoosJ. (2003). Comprehensive schools. In this volume— BrabeckM.M., WalshM.E., & LattaR. (Eds.), Meeting at the hyphen: Schools-universities-communities-professions in collaboration for student achievement and well being. The 102nd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
18.
DryfoosJ., & KnauerD. (2002, March). The evidence and lessons learned from full service community schools. Paper presented at the Leave No Child Behind: Improving Low-Performing Urban Schools Conference, The University at Albany, The State University of New York, Albany, NY.
19.
DuncanH. (1962). Communication and social order.New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
DunnW. (1997). Probing the boundaries of ignorance in policy analysis. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 277–298.
21.
EdelmanI. (2001). Participation and service integration in community-based initiatives. Journal of Community Practice, 9(1), 57–75.
22.
EliasM. (1994). Capturing excellence in applied settings: A participant conceptualizer and praxis explicator role for community psychologists. American Journal of Community Psychology, 22, 293–318.
23.
Foster-FishmanP., SalemD., AllenN., & FahrbachK. (2001). Facilitating inter-organizational collaboration: The contributions of inter-organizational alliances. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 875–905.
24.
GardnerS. (1999). Beyond collaboration to results: Hard choices in the future of services to children and families.Fullerton, CA: Center for Collaboration for Children, California State University.
25.
GoldringE., & HausmanC. (2001). Civic capacity and school principals: The missing link for community development. In CrowsonR. (Ed.), Community development and school reform (pp. 193–210). Oxford, U.K.: Elsevier Science, Ltd.
26.
HatchT. (1998a). How community action contributes to achievement. Educational Leadership, 55(8), 16–19.
27.
HatchT. (1998b). The differences in theory that matter in the practice of school improvement. American Educational Research Journal, 35(1), 3–31.
28.
HeldD. (1997). Democracy and globalization. Global Governance, 3, 251–257.
29.
HillP., CampbellC., & HarveyJ. (2000). It takes a city: Getting serious about urban school reform.Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
30.
HonigM., KahneJ., & McLaughlinM. (2001). School-community connections: Strengthening opportunity to learn and opportunity to teach. In RichardsonV. (Ed.), Fourth handbook of research on teaching (pp. 998–1028). New York: Macmillan.
31.
IngersollR. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 499–534.
32.
JanisI. (1972). Victims of groupthink.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
LawsonH. (1998). Collaborative educational leadership for 21st century school communities. In van VeenD., DayC., & WalravenG. (Eds.), Multi-service schools: Integrated services for children and youth at risk (pp. 173–193). Leuven/Apeldoorn, The Netherlands: Garant Publishers.
35.
LawsonH. (1999a). Two frameworks for analyzing relationships among school communities, teacher education, and interprofessional education and training programs. Teacher Education Quarterly, 26(4), 9–30.
36.
LawsonH. (1999b). Two new mental models for schools and their implications for principals’ roles, responsibilities, and preparation. National Association of Secondary School Principals’ Bulletin, 83(611), 8–27.
37.
LawsonH. (2000). Back to the future: New century professionalism and collaborative leadership for comprehensive, community-based systems of care. In SalleeA., LawsonH., & Briar-LawsonK. (Eds.), Innovative practices with vulnerable children and families (pp. 393–419). Dubuque, IA: Eddie Bowers Publishers, Inc.
38.
LawsonH. (2001, March). Reformulating the school violence problem: Implications for research, policy, and practice.International Conference on School Violence, UNESCO, Paris.
39.
LawsonH. (2002). Beyond community involvement and service learning to engaged universities. Universities and Community Schools, 7(1-2), 79–94.
40.
LawsonH., & BarkdullC. (2000). Gaining the collaborative advantage and promoting systems and cross-systems change. In SalleeA., LawsonH., & Briar-LawsonK. (Eds.), Innovative practices with vulnerable children and families (pp. 245–270). Dubuque, IA: Eddie Bowers Publishers, Inc.
41.
LawsonH., & Briar-LawsonK. (1997). Connecting the dots: Integrating school reform, school-linked services, parent involvement and community schools.Oxford, OH: The Danforth Foundation & The Institute for Educational Renewal at Miami University.
42.
LawsonH., & SailorW. (2000). Integrating services, collaborating, and developing connections with schools. Focus on Exceptional Children, 33(2), 1–22.
43.
McCannJ., & GrayB. (1986). Power and collaboration in human service domains. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 6(3), 58–67.
44.
McCroskeyJ. (2003). Challenges and opportunities for higher education. In this volume— BrabeckM.M., WalshM.E., & LattaR. (Eds.), Meeting at the hyphen: Schools-universities-communities-professions in collaboration for student achievement and well being. The 102nd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
45.
MitchellD., & ScottL. (1994). Professional and institutional perspectives on inter-agency collaboration. In AdlerL., & GardnerS. (Eds.), The politics of linking schools and social services (pp. 75–92). Washington, DC & London: The Falmer Press.
46.
MooneyJ., KlineP., & DavorenJ. (1999). Collaborative interventions: Promoting psychosocial competence and academic achievement. In TourseR., & MooneyJ. (Eds.), Collaborative practice: School and human service partnerships (pp. 105–136). Westport, CT & London: Praeger.
47.
QuinnJ. (2003). An interprofessional model and reflections on best collaborative practice. In this volume— BrabeckM.M., WalshM.E., & LattaR. (Eds.), Meeting at the hyphen: Schools-universities-communities-professions in collaboration for student achievement and well being. The 102nd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
48.
RubinH. (2002). Collaborative leadership: Developing effective partnerships in schools and communities.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
49.
ScottW.R. (1995). Institutions and organizations.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers.
50.
ShirleyD. (1998). Community organizing for urban school reform.Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
51.
TaylorH.L. (2002, March). Linking school reform to the neighborhood revitalization movement.Keynote address at the Leave No Child Behind: Improving Low-Performing Urban Schools Conference, The University at Albany, The State University of New York, Albany, NY.
52.
Taylor-PowellE., RossingB., & GeranJ. (1998). Evaluating collaboratives: Reaching the potential.Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Extension, Program Development and Evaluation, Cooperative Extension.
53.
Tschannen-MoranM., & HoyW. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 70, 547–593.
54.
TyackD. (1974). The one best system: A history of American urban education.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55.
TyackD., & CubanL. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56.
YohalemN., & PittmanK. (2001, October). Powerful pathways: Framing options and opportunities for vulnerable youth. Discussion paper presented at The Forum for Youth Investment, International Youth FoundationTakoma Park, MD.
57.
WalshM., BrabeckM., & HowardK. (1999). Interprofessional collaboration in children's services: Toward a theoretical framework. Children's Services: Social Policy, Research, & Practice, 2, 183–208.
58.
WengerE. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity.London & New York: Cambridge University Press.
59.
WynJ., & DwyerP. (2000). New patterns of youth in transition in education. International Social Science Journal, 164, 147–160.