Refusing to Leave Desegregation Behind: From Graduates of Racially Diverse Schools to the Supreme Court

Abstract

Background/Context

In light of the June 2007 U.S. Supreme Court decision in the Louisville and Seattle voluntary school desegregation cases, making it more difficult for district officials to racially balance their schools, this article presents an analysis of prior research on the long-term effects of attending racially diverse schools on their adult graduates as well as new data from interviews with graduates of desegregated schools in Louisville and Seattle. Although the bulk of research on school desegregation examines what is happening to students while they are still in school and their immediate academic outcomes, the growing body of research on the long-term effects of attending racially diverse schools on adult graduates is powerful and significant and, thus, should play a central role in public debates about the future of racial integration in American schools following the Court's ruling in these cases, referred to as Parents Involved.

Taken together, findings from this research on the long-term effects of school desegregation speak to both of the central themes to emerge from the larger body of research on racial integration within public schools or universities: 1. the “legacies of structural inequality” theme, which addresses the need for race-conscious policies to overcome decades of perpetuated racial inequality and 2 the “diversity rationale,” which focuses on preparing young people for a diverse society. The new interview data from Louisville and Seattle confirm these prior findings and add new insights.

Purpose

Knowing that prior research on the long-term effects of school desegregation spoke to the central legal issue in the cases before the Supreme Court in the Parents Involved cases, we wanted to explore the two prominent themes from that literature — “structural inequality” and the “diversity rationale” — as they related to the life experiences of Louisville and Seattle graduates of racially diverse schools.

Participants

We interviewed 42 graduates—classes of 1985 and 1986—of six high schools: Central, Fern Creek, and Louisville Male high schools in Louisville, and Franklin, Garfield, and Ingraham high schools in Seattle. These six schools were selected because in each city, they represented a wide range of student experiences given their different geographic locations within their districts, their curricular programs, and the social class and racial make-up of their student bodies by the mid-1980s. Still, in each of these schools, no one ethnic group made up more than 75% of the student body at the time these graduates attended them.

Research Design

Qualitative, in-depth interviews with a random sample of adult graduates (graduating classes of 1985 and 86) from six racially diverse high schools, which were purposively sampled to reflect the different experiences of student who went to public high schools in Louisville and Seattle at that time.

Data Collection and Analysis

Using a semi-structured, open-ended interview protocol, the authors interviewed a total of 19 graduates from the three Louisville high schools and 23 graduates from the Seattle high schools. In terms of the racial/ethnic identities of these 42 graduates from the six high schools across the two cities, 22 identified themselves as White, 14 as African Americans, 4 as Asian/Pacific Islanders, and 2 as mixed race, including one who was half Latino and half White.

Each interview lasted approximately 45 minutes—although they varied in length from 20 minutes to more than an hour—and was tape-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The transcripts were coded for themes that emerged from the interviewees’ responses across schools and context, and the following findings emerged as the most salient experiences of graduates across the six schools.

Findings/Results

1. Graduates of racially mixed schools in Louisville and Seattle said they learned to be more accepting of and comfortable with people of other racial backgrounds. Like their counterparts in the six cities of the Wells et al. (in press) study, the Louisville and Seattle graduates we interviewed said they believe that their day-to-day experiences attending diverse public schools as children and adolescents did indeed change them, making them more open-minded and thus more accepting of people who differ from them racially and in terms of their background and culture.

2. Louisville and Seattle graduates and the diversity rationale: Desegregated public schools prepared them for a global economy and society.

Preparation for working in a diverse setting—the “diversity rationale”—was, for these graduates, by far the most obvious and pragmatic outcome of their experiences in desegregated public schools. The vast majority of graduates we interviewed in Louisville and Seattle said that at work in particular, they draw on the skills they learned in their desegregated public schools, skills of getting along and feeling comfortable with people of divergent backgrounds and cultures.

3. Overcoming structural inequality: Without diverse public schools, most graduates would have grown up in race isolation.

In a society in which housing patterns, places of worship, and social circles are often segregated by race, diverse public schools have been, for many students, the only institutions in which cross-racial interaction and understanding can occur. They have also too often been historically the only institutions in our society in which students of color can gain access to predominantly White and prestigious institutions—in K–12 schooling or higher education.

Conclusions/Recommendations

We argue, based on our research and that of many others, that in an era when technology and free trade are breaking down physical and economic barriers across cultures and traditions, to not prepare our children to embrace and accept differences to the extent possible—the diversity rationale—is shortsighted and irresponsible. But even more important, we need to question how we can maintain a healthy democracy in a society so strongly divided by race, social class, and ideology now that the Supreme Court's decision has made it increasingly difficult to challenge such structural inequality, in spite of a compelling rationale for greater school-level diversity.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allport

(1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Aronson

S. H.

(1954). Review of the nature of prejudice. Social Problems, 2(2), 113—114.

Balkin

J. M.

(2005). Plessy, Brown and Grutter: A play in three acts. Cardozo Law Review, 26, 1689—1730.

Braddock

J. H.

(1980). The perpetuation of segregation across levels of education: A behavioral assessment of the contact-hypothesis. Sociology of Education, 53, 178—186.

Braddock

J. H.

, Crain

R. L.

, and McPartland

J. M.

(1984, December). A long-term view of school desegregation: Some recent studies of graduates as adults. Phi Delta Kappan, 259—264.

Braddock

J. H.

, Crain

R. L.

, McPartland

J. M.

, and Dawkins

M. P.

(1986). Applicant race and job placement decisions: A national survey experiment. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 6, 3—24.

Braddock

J. H.

, and McPartland

J. M.

(1987). How minorities continue to be excluded from equal employment opportunities: Research on labor market and institutional barriers. Journal of Social Issues, 43, 5—39.

Brief for Amy Stuart Wells et al. as Amici Curiae Supporting respondents in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 and Crystal D. Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education. (2006). Retrieved December 18, 2006, from http://www.naacpldf.org/content/pdf/voluntary/both_parties/Amy_Stuart_Wells_et_al._Brief.pdf

Brief for the Caucus for Structural Equality as Amici Curiae, Supporting respondents in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 and Crystal D. Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education (2006) Retrieved December 6, 2006, from http://www.naacpldf.org/content/pdf/voluntary/both_parties/Caucus_for_Structural_Equity_Brief.pdf

10.

Brief of 553 Social Scientists. (2006). Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No 1, et al., and Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education, et al. In the Supreme Court of the United States. Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents. Retrieved October 11, 2006, from http://www.naacpldf.org/content/pdf/voluntary/social_scientists/Brief_of_553_Social_Scientists.pdf

11.

Correspondents of the New York Times. (2001). How race is lived in America. New York: Times Books.

12.

Crain

R. L.

, and Mahard

R. E.

(1978). Desegregation and Black achievement: A review of the research. Law and Contemporary Problems, 42(3), 17—55.

13.

Cutler

D. M.

, Glaeser

E. L.

, and Vigdor

J. L.

(1999). The rise and decline of the American ghetto. Journal of Political Economy, 107, 455—507.

14.

Dawkins

, and Braddock

J. H.

(1994). The continuing significant of desegregation: School racial composition and African American inclusion in American society. Journal of Negro Education, 63, 394—405.

15.

de Souza Briggs

(Ed.). (2005). The geography of opportunity: Race and housing choice in metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

16.

Drier

, Mollenkopf

, and Swanstrom

(2004). Place matters: Metropolitics for the twenty-first century. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

17.

Eaton

S. F.

(2001). The other Boston busing story. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

18.

Farley

J. E.

, and Squires

G. D.

(2005). Fences and neighbors: Segregation in 21st-century America. Contexts, 4(1), 33—39.

19.

Greenhouse

(2006, June 6). Court to weigh race as factor in school rolls. The New York Times. Retrieved June 6, 2006, from http://www.nytimes.com

20.

Grissmer

, Flanagan

, and Williamson

(1998). Why did the Black-White score gap narrow in the 1970s and 1980s? In Jencks

, and Phillips

(Eds.), The Black-White test score gap (pp. 182—226). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

21.

Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003)

22.

Holme

J. J.

, Wells

A. S.

, and Revilla

A. T.

(2005). Learning through experience: What graduates gained by attending desegregated high schools. Equity and Excellence in Education, 38(1), 14—24.

23.

Lindsay

M. J.

(2006). How antidiscrimination law learned to live with racial inequality. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 75, 87—141.

24.

Linn

R. L.

, and Welner

K. G.

(Eds.). (2007). Race-conscious policies for assigning students to schools: Social science research and the Supreme Court cases. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education.

25.

McPartland

J. M.

, and Braddock

J. H.

(1981). Going to college and getting a good job: The impact of desegregation. In and and Hawley

W.D.

(Ed.), Effective school desegregation: Equality, quality and feasibility (pp. 141—154). London: SAGE.

26.

Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education on Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Joint Appendix. No. 05-915 (2006).

27.

Metropolitan Center for Urban Education. (2005). “With all deliberate speed”: Achievement, citizenship and diversity in American education. New York: Steinhart School of Education, New York University.

28.

Milliken v. Bradley. 418 U.S. 717 (1974).

29.

NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund et al. (2005). Looking to the future: Voluntary K-12 school integration. Retrieved July 18, 2006, from http://www.naacpldf.org

30.

Nagda

B. (Ratnesh) A.

, Tropp

L. R.

, and Paluck

E. L.

(2006). Looking back as we look ahead: Integrating research, theory and practice on intergroup relations. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 439—451.

31.

Oakes

(1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

32.

Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 and Crystal D. Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education 551 U.S. ___ (2007). Justice Kennedy's Opinion.

33.

Parents Involved v. Seattle School District No. 1. U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. No. 01-35450. D.C. No. CV-00-01205-BJR (2005).

34.

Pettigrew

T. F.

(1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65—85.

35.

Pettigrew

, and Tropp

L. R.

(2000). Does intergroup contact reduce prejudice: Recent meta-analytic findings. In and and Oskamp

(Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination: The Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology (pp. 93—114). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

36.

Agenda

Public

. (1998). Time to move on: African-American and White parents set an agenda for public school. New York: Author.

37.

Regents of University of California v. Bakke, 438 U. S. 265 (1978).

38.

Sethi

, and Somanathan

(2004). Inequality and segregation. Journal of Political Economy, 112, 1296—1322.

39.

Towles-Schwen

, and Fazio

R. H.

(2001). On the origins of racial attitudes: Correlates of childhood experiences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 162—175.

40.

Verdun

(2005). The big disconnect between segregation and integration. Negro Educational Review 56, 67—83.

41.

Wells

A. S.

(1995). Re-examining social science research on school desegregation: Long-versus short-term effects. Teachers College Record, 96, 691—706.

42.

Wells

A. S.

, and Crain

R. L.

(1994). Perpetuation theory and the long-term effects of school desegregation. Review of Educational Research, 64, 531—555.

43.

Wells

A. S.

, and Crain

R. L.

(1997). Stepping over the color line: African American students in White suburban schools. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

44.

Wells

A. S.

, and Frankenberg

(2007) “Creating Racially Diverse Public Schools After the Supreme Court Decision in the Louisville and Seattle Cases: What to do When the ‘End’ is Justified, but the ‘Means’ are Not.” Phi Delta Kappan.

45.

Wells

A. S.

, Holme

J. J.

, Revilla

A. T.

, and Atanda

A. K.

(2004). How desegregation changed us: The effects of racially mixed schools on students and society (Final report from the Understanding Race and Education Study). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.

46.

Wells

A. S.

, Holme

J. J.

, Revilla

A. J.

, and Atanda

A. K.

(2009). Both sides now: The story of desegregation's graduates. Berkeley: University of Califorrnia Press.

47.

Wells

A. S.

, and Serna

(1996). The politics of culture: Understanding local political resistance to detracking in racially mixed schools. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 93—118.

48.

Wood

P. B.

, and Sonleitner

(1996). The effect of childhood interracial contact on adult antiblack prejudice. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20(1), 1—17.