In June 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled to prohibit student assignment on the basis of race. In Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 (hereafter referred to as PICS), the court deemed race-based strategies used to voluntarily desegregate school districts to be unconstitutional. Although the ruling certainly has important practical implications for the desegregation of U.S. schools, the PICS decision is also significant for what it reflects about the climate surrounding school segregation.
Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study
One purpose of this article is to examine the larger landscape of contemporary views in which the PICS decision is situated. As such, the focus is less on the specific impact on student assignment policies and more on the broader picture of desegregation and education. A second purpose of this article is to illustrate the important role that critical race theory (CRT) can play in viewing these issues. Specifically, the author uses CRT to analyze the historical and contemporary conditions of two adjacent school districts and to connect the conditions in these districts to the PICS ruling. Insofar as neither district, at least on the surface, was directly impacted by the PICS decision in a practical sense, these cases provide a different means through which to understand the potential significance of PICS.
Research Design
This article is an analytic essay that draws on both historical accounts and contemporary descriptive data from the two school districts.
Conclusions/Recommendations
The data reviewed in this article highlight the ongoing resegregation of the two districts. I argue that this resegregation is tied to collective definitions of segregation that are supported by color-blindness and the valuing of private choice. These collective definitions are also clearly reflected in PICS and represent the connection between the Supreme Court decision and the conditions in two districts that ostensibly are not impacted by the ruling. Insofar as these collective definitions shape the way that we view school segregation, we will not be able to address the ongoing inequity tied to segregation until we change what we see.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BellD. (1980). Brown v. Board of Education and the interest-convergence principle. Harvard Law Review, 93, 518–533.
2.
BellD. (1992). Faces at the bottom of the well: The permanence of racism. New York: Basic Books.
3.
BellD. (2004). Silent covenants: Brown v. Board of Education and the unfulfilled hopes for racial reform. New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
BilesR. (1986). A bittersweet victory: Public school desegregation in Memphis. Journal of Negro Education, 55 (4), 470–483.
5.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2006). Racism without racists: Colorblind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
6.
BronsnanJ., CovingtonJ., & DowningS. (2001, April 5). Races staying “isolated” in Memphis, study says. The Commercial Appeal, p. A1.
7.
City schools integration timeline. (2004, May 16). The Commercial Appeal, p. A18.
8.
CoganL., SchmidtW., & WileyD. (2001). Who takes what math and in which track? Using TIMMS to characterize U.S. students’ eighth-grade mathematics learning opportunities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23, 323–341.
9.
CrenshawK. (1989). Foreword: Toward a race-conscious pedagogy in legal education. National Black Law Journal, 11, 1–14.
10.
CrenshawK., GotandaN., PellerG., & ThomasK. (Eds.). (1995). Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement. New York: New Press.
11.
Darling-HammondL. (1997). The right to learn: A blueprint for creating schools that work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12.
Decuir-GunbyJ. (2006). “Proving your skin is white, you can have everything”: Race, racial identity, and property rights in Whiteness in the Supreme Court Case of Josephine DeCuir. In DixsonA. & RousseauC. (Eds.), Critical race theory in education: All God's children got a song (pp. 89–112). New York: Routledge.
13.
DelgadoR. (2001). Two ways to think about race: Reflections on the id, the ego, and other reformist theories of equal protection. Georgetown Law Review, 89, 2279, 2283–2285.
14.
DelgadoR. (2003). Crossroads and blind alleys: A critical examination of recent writings about race. Texas Law Review, 82, 121–152.
15.
DelgadoR., & StefancicJ. (2001). Critical race theory: An introduction. New York: New York University Press.
16.
DonnorJ. (2006). Parent(s): The biggest influence in the education of African American football student-athletes. In DixsonA. & RousseauC. (Eds.), Critical race theory in education: All God's children got a song (pp. 153–166). New York: Routledge.
17.
DudziakM. (2000). Cold war civil rights: Race and the image of American democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18.
EgertonJ. (1973). Promise of progress: Memphis school desegregation 1972–73. Atlanta: GA. Southern Regional Council.
19.
FetlerM. (1999). High school staff characteristics and mathematics test results. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 79(9), 1–22.
20.
FrankenbergE. (2005). The impact of school segregation on residential housing patterns. In BogerJ. & OrfieldG. (Eds.), School resegregation: Must the South turn back? (pp. 164–184). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
21.
FrankenbergE., & LeC. (2009). The post-Parents Involved challenge: Confronting extralegal obstacles to integration. Ohio State Law Journal, 69, 1015–1072.
22.
FreemanC., ScafidiB. & SjoquistD. (2005). Racial segregation in Georgia public schools, 1994–2001: Trends, causes, and impact on teacher quality. In BogerJ. & OrfieldG. (Eds.), School resegregation: Must the South turn back? (pp. 143–163). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
23.
GillbornD. (2008). Racism and education: Coincidence or conspiracy?New York: Routledge.
24.
GotandaN. (1991). A critique of “Our constitution is color-blind.”Stanford Law Review, 44, 1–68.
25.
GreenL. (2007). Battling the plantation mentality: Memphis and the Black freedom struggle. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
26.
Haney-LopezI. (2007). A nation of minorities: Race, ethnicity, and reactionary colorblindness. Stanford Law Review, 59, 985–1063.
27.
HerentonW. (1971). A historical study of school desegregation in the Memphis City Schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.
28.
KielD. (2008). Exploded dream: Desegregation in the Memphis City Schools. Law and Inequality, 26, 261–303.
29.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1999). Preparing teachers for diverse student populations: A critical race theory perspective. In Iran-NejadA. & PearsonP. (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 24, pp. 221–247). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
30.
Ladson-BillingsG., & TateW. (1995). Towards a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97, 47–68.
31.
LawrenceC. (2001). Two views of the river: A critique of the liberal defense of affirmative action. Columbia Law Review, 101, 928–976.
32.
LawrenceC. (2005). Forbidden conversations: On race, privacy, and community. Yale Law Journal, 114, 1353–1403.
33.
LawrenceC. (2006). Who is the child left behind? The racial meaning of the new school reform. Suffolk University Law Review, 39, 699–718.
34.
LeeJ. (2004). Multiple facets of inequity in racial and ethnic achievement gaps. Peabody Journal of Education, 79(2), 51–73.
35.
LipmanP. (2006). “This is America” 2005: The political economy of education reform in the public interest. In Ladson-BillingsG. & TateW. (Eds.), Education research in the public interest: Social justice, action, and policy (pp. 98–116). New York: Teachers College Press.
36.
MasseyD., & DentonN. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37.
MatsudaM. (1995). Looking to the bottom: Critical legal studies and reparations. In CrenshawK., GotandaN., PellerG., & ThomasK. (Eds.), Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement (pp. 63–79). New York: New Press.
38.
MatsudaM., LawrenceC., DelgadoR., & CrenshawK. (Eds.). (1993). Words that wound: Critical race theory, assaultive speech, and the first amendment. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
39.
McRaeR. (1996). Oral history of deliberate unconstitutional separation of Negro race by Board of Education Memphis City Schools. Unpublished manuscript, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN.
40.
MelvinL. (2007a, July 15). Diversity no issue in county classes. The Commercial Appeal, p. B1.
41.
MelvinL. (2007b, July 4). Hearing set on desegregation. The Commercial Appeal, p. B1.
42.
MickelsonR. (2005). The incomplete desegregation of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg schools and its consequences, 1971–2004. In BogerJ. & OrfieldG. (Eds.), School resegregation: Must the South turn back? (pp. 87–110). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
43.
NoblitG., & CollinsT. (1978). School flight and school policy: Desegregation and resegregation in the Memphis City Schools. Urban Review, 10, 203–212.
44.
OakesJ., MuirK., & JosephR. (2000). Coursetaking and achievement in mathematics and science: Inequalities that endure and change. Madison, WI: National Institute of Science Education.
45.
OrfieldG. (2005). The Southern dilemma: Losing Brown, fearing Plessy. In BogerJ. & OrfieldG. (Eds.), School resegregation: Must the South turn back? (pp. 1–24). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
46.
OrfieldG., & LeeC. (2007). Historic reversals, accelerating resegregation, and the need for new integration strategies. Los Angeles: Civil Rights Project.
47.
PohlmannM. (2008). Opportunity lost: Race and poverty in Memphis City Schools. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press.
48.
powellj. (2005). A new theory of integrated education: True integration. In BogerJ. & OrfieldG. (Eds.), School resegregation: Must the South turn back? (pp. 281–304). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
49.
ReardonS., & YunJ. (2002). Private school racial enrollments and segregation. Cambridge, MA: Civil Rights Project.
50.
ReardonS., & YunJ. (2003). Do Southern schools face rapid resegregation? Integrating neighborhoods, segregating schools: The retreat from school desegregation in the South, 1990–2000. North Carolina Law Review, 81, 1563–1596.
51.
RidenourC., LasleyT., & BainbridgeW. (2001). The impact of emerging market-based public policy on urban schools and a democratic society. Education and Urban Society, 34(1), 66–83.
52.
Robinson v. Shelby County Board of Education, 311 F. Supp. 97 (1986).
53.
Robinson v. Shelby County Board of Education, 566 F. 3d 642 (2009).
54.
RousseauC., & TateW. (2003). No time like the present: Reflecting on equity in school mathematics. Theory Into Practice, 42, 211–216.
55.
SaporitoS., & SohoniD. (2006). Coloring outside the lines: Racial segregation in public schools and their attendance boundaries. Sociology of Education, 79, 81–105.
56.
ShapiroT. (2004). The hidden cost of being African American: How wealth perpetuates inequality. New York: Oxford University Press.
57.
SmrekarC. (2007, July 16). A practical end to racial diversity in schools. Teachers College Record. Retrieved January 2, 2009, from http://www.tcrecord.org (ID No. 14549)
58.
SolorzanoD. (2001). Critical race theory, racial microaggressions, and campus racial climate: The experiences of African American college students. Journal of Negro Education, 69, 60–73.
59.
SolorzanoD., & YossoT. (2002). Critical race methodology: Counter-storytelling as an analytical framework for education research. Qualitative Inquiry, 8, 23–44.
60.
TateW. (1997). Critical race theory and education: History, theory, and implications. In AppleM. (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 22, pp. 195–247). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
61.
TaylorG. (2007). Derrick Bell's narratives as parables. New York University Review of Law and Social Change, 31, 225–269.
62.
TerrellJ. (2004, May 16). “White flight” from Memphis City Schools. The Commercial Appeal, p. A19.
63.
WellsA., DuranJ., & WhiteT. (2008). Refusing to leave desegregation behind: From graduates of racially diverse schools to the Supreme Court. Teachers College Record, 110, 2532–2570.
