AlexanderP. A., & FivesH. (2000). Achieving expertise in teaching reading. In BakerL., DreherM. J., & GuthrieJ. T. (Eds.), Engaging your readers: Promoting achievement and motivation (pp. 285–308). New York: Guilford Press.
2.
AlexanderP. A., & MurphyP. K. (1998). The research base for APA's learner-centered psychological principles. In LambertN. M. & McCombsB. L. (Eds.), Issues in school reform: A sampler of psychological perspectives on learner-centered schools (pp. 25–60). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
3.
BakerE. L., BartonP. E., Darling-HammondL., HaertelE., LaddH. F., LinnR. L., . (2010). Problems with the use of student test scores to evaluate teachers. Economic Policy Institute Briefing Paper (No. 278). Washington DC: Economic Policy Institute.
4.
BalfanzR. (2006). Closing the mathematics achievement gap in high-poverty middle schools: Enablers and constraints. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 11(2), 143–159.
5.
BallD. L., & CohenD. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In Darling-HammondL. & SykesG., Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3–32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
BoardmanA. G., & WoodruffA. L. (2004). Teacher change and “high-stakes” assessment: What happens to professional development?Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(6), 545–557.
8.
Booher-JenningsJ. (2005). Below the bubble: “Educational triage” and the Texas accountability system. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 231–268.
9.
BransfordJ. D., BrownA. L., & CockingR. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington DC: National Academy of Science.
10.
Center for Education Policy. (2006, March). From the capital to the classroom: Year 4 of the No Child Left Behind Act.Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.
11.
ChallJ. S., & JacobsL. E. (2003). Poor children's fourth-grade slump. American Educator, 27, 14–17.
12.
ChallJ. S., JacobsV. A., & BaldwinL. E. (1991). The reading crisis: Why poor children fall behind.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
ChamblissM. J., AlexanderP. A., & PriceJ. N. (2012). Epistemological threads in the fabric of pedagogical research. Teachers College Record, 114(4), 35 pages.
14.
ChamblissM., & GraeberA. (2003, April). Does subject matter matter? Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
15.
ChamblissM., & ValliL. (2011). Upper elementary reading lessons: Case studies of real teaching. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
16.
CroningerR. G., BueseD., & LarsonJ. (2012). A mixed-methods look at teaching quality: Challenges and possibilities from one study. Teachers College Record, 114(4), 36 pages.
17.
CroningerR., ValliL., & PriceJ. (2003. April). Mapping the policy environment for high-quality teaching: Can we get there from here? Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
18.
Darling-HammondL. (1997). The right to learn: A blueprint for creating schools that work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19.
FenstermacherG. D., & RichardsonV. (2005). On making determination of quality in teaching. Teachers College Record, 107, 186–213.
20.
FlodenR. E. (2001). Research on effects of teaching: A continuing model for research on teaching. In RichardsonV. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 3–16). Washington, DC: AERA.
21.
GraeberA. O., NewtonK. J., & ChamblissM. J. (2012). Crossing the borders again: Challenges in comparing quality instruction in mathematics and reading. Teachers College Record, 114(4), 30 pages.
22.
GraeberA., ValliL., & NewtonK. (2011). Upper elementary math lessons: Case studies of real teaching. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
23.
GrossmanP., & McDonaldM. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 184–205.
24.
GoodT., & BrophyJ. (2003). Looking in classrooms (9th ed.) Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
25.
HillH. C. (2009). Evaluating value-added models: A validity approach. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 28, 700–709.
26.
JacksonP. (1986). The practice of teaching.New York: Teachers College Press.
27.
LampertM. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
28.
McNeilL. M. (2000). Creating new inequalities: Contradictions of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(10), 728–735.
29.
MooreW. P. (1994). The devaluation of standardized testing: One district's response to a mandates assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 74(4), 343–367.
30.
NewmannF., SmithB., AllensworthE., & BrykA.S. (2001). Instructional program coherence: What it is and why it should guide school improvement policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(4), 297–321.
31.
NewmannF., & WehlageG. (1995). Successful school restructuring. A report to the public and educators by the Center on organization and restructuring of schools. Madison: University of Wisconsin–Madison.
32.
SandersW., & HornS.P. (1998). Research findings from the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS) database: Implications for educational evaluation and research. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center.
SarasonS. (1999). Teaching as a performing art. New York: Teachers College Press.
35.
ShulmanL. S. (1986a). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In WittrockM. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 3–36). New York: Macmillan.
36.
ShulmanL.S. (1986b). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
37.
SternbergR. (2008). Applying psychological theories to educational practice. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 150–165.
38.
ValliL. (2000). Facilitating reading instruction through school-wide coordination. In BakerL., DreherJ., & GuthrieJ. (Eds.), Engaging young readers: Promoting achievement and motivation (pp. 237–263). New York: Guilford Press.
39.
ValliL., & ChamblissM. (2007). Creating classroom cultures: One teacher, two lessons, and a high-stakes test. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 38(1), 57–75.
40.
ValliL., CroningerR. G., & BueseD. (2012). Studying high-quality teaching in a highly charged policy environment. Teachers College Record, 114(4), 33 pages.
41.
ValliL., CroningerR., ChamblissM., GraeberA., & BueseD. (2008). Test driven: High-stakes accountability in elementary schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
42.
ValliL., CroningerR., ChamblissM., GraeberA., & PriceJ. (2004, April). A study of high-quality teaching: Mathematics and reading. Paper presented at the Presidential-Sponsored Symposium, AERA annual meeting, San Diego, CA.