Mandated Engagement: The Impact of Early College High Schools

Abstract

Background

Early college high schools, small schools that blur the line between high school and college, have been obtaining very strong results. This paper uses the frame of student engagement to posit an explanation for the success of these schools.

Purpose

This paper examines the impact of early college high schools on indicators and facilitators of engagement in the ninth-grade. The paper also looks at how early college students perceive these facilitators of engagement.

Participants

The main sample for this study includes students who applied to an early college high school and went through a lottery process. Student who were accepted through the lottery are the treatment students and those who were not accepted form the control group.

Intervention

Early colleges are small schools, often located on college campuses, that aim to provide a rigorous course of study with the goal of ensuring that all students graduate with a high school diploma and two years of university transfer credit or an associate's degree. Serving students in Grades 9-12 (or 13), the schools are targeted at students who typically are under-represented in college.

Data Collection and Analysis

The study uses administrative data submitted to the North Carolina Department of Instruction, including suspensions and attendance data. The study team also administered an original survey to treatment and control students that included scales on indicators and facilitators of engagement. Both the administrative and survey data were analyzed using multiple regression. Finally, the study team collected qualitative data from interviews with early college students.

Results

Early college students had better attendance, lower suspensions, and higher levels of engagement than control students. Compared to the control students, early college students also reported higher levels of all of the facilitators of engagement examined, including better relationships with teachers, more rigorous and relevant instruction, more academic and affective support, and higher expectations.

Conclusions

Students in early colleges experienced overall higher levels of engagement on a variety of dimensions. The qualitative data suggest that early colleges make concerted and purposeful efforts to engage students in school. These efforts seem to almost require that students are active participants in school; in other words, early colleges can be seen as essentially “mandating engagement.”

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akey

T. M.

(2006). School context, student attitudes and behavior, and academic achievement: an exploratory analysis. New York, NY: MDRC.

American Institutes of Research, & SRI International. (2004). The National School District and Network Grants Program: Year 2 evaluation report. Retrieved from http://smallhs.sri.com/

American Institutes of Research, & SRI International. (2008). 2003-2007 Early College High School Initiative Evaluation: Emerging patterns and relationships. Retrieved from http://www.air.org/files/ECHSI_Synthesis_Report_FINAL.pdf

American Institutes of Research, & SRI International. (2009). Six years and counting: the ECHSI matures. Retreived from http://www.air.org/files/ECHSI_Eval_Report_2009_081309.pdf

Ames

, & Archer

(1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivational processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260–267.

Appleton

J. J.

, Christenson

S. L.

, & Furlong

M. J.

(2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369–386.

Bowen

, & Richman

(2005). School Success Profile. Chapel Hill, NC: Jordan Institute for Families, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Bruce

L. M.

(2007). Perceptions, motivations, and achievement of African-American students enrolled in a middle college high school (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: Chapel Hill, NC.

Edmunds

J. A.

, Bernstein

, Glennie

, Willse

, Arshavsky

, & Unlu

. (2010). Preparing students for college: the implementation and impact of the Early College High School Model. Peabody Journal of Education, 85(3), 348–364.

10.

Edmunds

J. A.

, Bernstein

, Unlu

, Glennie

, Smith

, & Arshavsky

(2012). Keeping students in school: Impact of the early college high school model on students’ enrollment in school. Paper presented at the Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, Evanston, IL.

11.

Edmunds

J. A.

, Bernstein

, Unlu

, Glennie

, Willse

, Smith

, & . (2012). Expanding the start of the college pipeline: Ninth grade findings from an experimental study of the impact of the Early College High School Model. Journal for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 5(2), 136–159.

12.

Erzberger

, & Kelle

(2003). Making inferences in mixed methods: the rules of integration. In Tashakorri

A. T.

(Ed.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 457–488). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

13.

Finn

J. D.

, & Rock

D. A.

(1997). Academic success among students at risk of school failure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2), 221–234.

14.

Finn

(1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117–142.

15.

Fredericks

J. A.

, Blumenfeld

P. C.

, & Paris

A. H.

(2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.

16.

Jimerson

S. R.

, Campos

, & Greif

J. L.

(2003). Toward an understanding of definitions and measures of school engagement and related terms. The California School Psychologist, 8, 7–27.

17.

Lamborn

S. D.

, Brown

B. B.

, Mounts

N. S.

, & Steinberg

(1992). Putting school in perspective: The influence of family, peers, extracurricular participation, and part-time work on academic engagement. In Newmann

F. M.

(Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 153–181). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

18.

Lee

V. E.

, & Burkham

(2003). Dropping out of high school: The role of school organization and structure. American Education Research Journal, 40(2), 353–393.

19.

Lee

V. E.

, Smerdon

B. A.

, Alfeld-Liro

, & Brown

S. L.

(2000). Inside small and large high schools: Curriculum and social relations. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(2), 147–171.

20.

Lee

V. E.

, & Smith

J. B.

(1993). Effects of school restructuring on the achievement and engagement of middle-grade students. Sociology of Education, 66, 164–187.

21.

Lee

V. E.

, & Smith

J. B.

(1997). High school size: Which works best and for whom? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(3), 205–227.

22.

Lee

V. E.

, & Smith

J. B.

(1999). Social support and achievement for young adolescents in Chicago: The role of school academic press. American Educational Research Journal, 36 (4), 907–945.

23.

Lipsey

M. W.

, & Wilson

(2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

24.

Marks

H. M.

(2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 153–184.

25.

Martin

A. J.

, & Dowson

(2009). Interpersonal relationships, motivation, engagement and achievement: Yields for theory, current issues, and educational practice. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 327–365.

26.

Morse

J. L.

(2003). Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design. In Tashakkori

& Teddlie

(Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 189–208). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

27.

National Research Council and the Institute of Medicine. (2004). Engaging schools: Fostering high school students’ motivation to learn. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

28.

Newmann

F. M.

, Bryk

A. S.

, & Nagaoka

J. K.

(January, 2001). Authentic intellectual work and standardized tests: Conflict or coexistence? Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research.

29.

Newmann

F. M.

, Lopez

, & Bryk

A. S.

(October, 1998). The quality of intellectual work in Chicago schools: A baseline report. Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research.

30.

North Carolina New Schools Project. (December, 2007). Design principles for innovative high schools. Retrieved March 10, 2010, from http://newschoolsproject.org/page.php?p=3.1

31.

Roberts

M. A.

(2007). Student engagement in the early college high school (Doctoral dissertation). North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC. Retreived from http://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/ir/bitstream/1840.16/3410/1/etd.pdf

32.

Rosnow

R. L.

, & Rosenthal

(1976). The volunteer subject revisited. Australian Journal of Psychology, 28(2), 97–108.

33.

Scales

W. D.

, & Willse

J. T.

(2008). Creation of a student survey for evaluation of early college high schools. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, New York, NY.

34.

Sebring

P. B.

, Bryk

A. S.

, Roderick

, Camburn

, Luppescu

, & Thum

Y. M.

, . (1996). Charting reform in Chicago: The students speak. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.

35.

Thompson

, & Onganga

(2011). “Flying the plane while we build it”: A case study of an early college high school. The High School Journal, 94(2), 43–57.

36.

Turner

J. C.

, Cox

K. E.

, DiCintio

, Meyer

D. K.

, Logan

, & Thomas

C. T.

(1998). Creating contexts for involvement in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 730–745.

37.

Visher

, Teitelbaum

, & Emanual

(1999). Key high school reform strategies: An overview of research findings in New American High Schools: High schools at the leading edge of reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Vocational and Adult Education.

38.

Voelkl

K. E.

(1997). Identification with school. American Journal of Education, 105(3), 294–318.

39.

Walker

C. O.

, & Greene

B. A.

(2009). The relations between student motivational beliefs and cognitive engagement in high school. Journal of Educational Research, 102(6), 463–471.

40.

Yazzie-Mintz

(2010). Charting the path from engagement to achievement: A report on the 2009 High School Survey of Student Engagement. Bloomington, IN: Center for Evaluation and Education Policy.