Learning by Doing: The Characteristics,Effectiveness,and Persistence of Teachers who Were Teaching Assistants First

Abstract

Background/Context

In response to a shortage of highly qualified teachers, states and school districts have enacted a number of policy innovations over the last two decades. While researchers have evaluated many of these reforms, little is known about the initial effectiveness of individuals with prior teaching assistant experience. We review existing literature related to teaching assistants and utilize administrative data to examine a number of characteristics of individuals who transition from work as teaching assistants to jobs as regular classroom teachers.

Study Purpose

Individuals who become classroom teachers after having prior experience in schools working as teaching assistants may perform differently than other teachers due to additional exposure to classroom practices. The purpose of this study is to identify differences in the characteristics, effectiveness, and persistence of teachers who work as teaching assistants prior to entering the classroom as regular classroom teachers.

Population

While the population of focus varies somewhat across research questions, we generally focus on teachers with less than five years of experience working in elementary and middle school grades in all North Carolina public schools from 2005–2006 to 2009–2010. Additional data on teaching assistants employed from 2000–2001 to 2009–2010 in North Carolina public schools allows identification of individuals who had prior experience as teaching assistants in the state.

Research Design

Using administrative data records, we utilize quantitative descriptions of teacher characteristics and persistence to identify differences between teachers who entered the classroom with prior teaching assistant experience and other groups of teachers. For effectiveness comparisons, we estimate value-added models to compare the effectiveness of teachers in the identified groups of interest.

Findings/Results

Overall, we find that teachers who began as teaching assistants are (1) older, more racially diverse, lower-scoring on licensure exams, and more likely to enter the profession alternatively; (2) more effective in elementary-grades math and reading; and (3) more likely to remain as classroom teachers in North Carolina public schools.

Conclusions/Recommendations

These findings indicate that former teaching assistants represent a quality and highly persistent labor source and call for continued research to understand how additional exposure to classrooms benefits early-career teacher performance.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbate-Vaughn

, & Paugh

(2009). The paraprofessional-to-teacher pipeline: Barriers and accomplishments. Journal of Developmental Education, 33(1), 16–29.

Alliance for Excellent Education. (2004). Tapping the potential: Retaining and developing high-quality teachers. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education. Retrieved from http://all4ed.org/reports-factsheets/tapping-the-potential-retaining-and-developing-high-quality-new-teachers/

Bandura

(1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.

Bastian

K. C.

, & Henry

G. T.

(2014). Teachers without borders: Consequences of teacher labor force mobility. Chapel Hill, NC: Education Policy Initiative at Carolina. http://publicpolicy.unc.edu/files/2014/02/Out-of-State_WP_2013.pdf

Bastian

K. C.

, Henry

G. T.

, & Thompson

C. L.

(2013). Incorporating access to more effective teachers into assessments of educational resource equity. Education Finance and Policy, 8(4), 560–580.

Bernal

, & Aragon

(2004). Critical factors affecting the success of paraprofessionals in the first two years of career ladder projects in Colorado. Remedial and Special Education, 25(4), 205–213.

Boyd

, Grossman

, Lankford

, Loeb

, & Wyckoff

(2009). Teacher preparation and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 416–440.

Boyd

, Lankford

, Loeb

, Ronfeldt

, & Wyckoff

(2011). The role of teacher quality in retention and hiring: Using applications-to-transfer to uncover preferences of teachers and schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30(1), 88–110.

Casey

D. C.

(2013, July 31). New scholarship program aims to help ease rural teacher shortage. Education Week. Retrieved from http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/rural_education/2013/07/new_scholarship_program_aims_to_help_solve_rural_teacher_shortage.html

10.

Chetty

, Friedman

J. N.

, & Rockoff

J. E.

(2011). The long-term impacts of teachers: Teacher value-added and student outcomes in adulthood (NBER Working Paper 17699). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w17699

11.

Clotfelter

C. T.

, Ladd

H. F.

, & Vigdor

J. L.

(2005). Who teaches whom? Race and the distribution of novice teachers. Economics of Education Review, 24(4), 377–392.

12.

Clotfelter

C. T.

, Ladd

H. F.

, & Vigdor

J. L.

(2007). Teacher credentials and student achievement: Longitudinal analysis with student fixed effects. Economics of Education Review, 26(6), 673–682.

13.

Clotfelter

C. T.

, Ladd

H. F.

, & Vigdor

J. L.

(2010). Teacher credentials and student achievement in high school: A cross-subject analysis with student fixed effects. Journal of Human Resources, 45(3), 655–681.

14.

Coggshall

, & Sexton

(2008). Teachers on the move: A look at teacher interstate mobility policy and practice. Whitinsville, MA: National Association of State Directors of Teacher Education and Certification Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED518859.pdf

15.

Dee

T. S.

(2004). Teachers, race, and student achievement in a randomized experiment. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), 195–210.

16.

Feistritzer

(2011). Profiles of teachers in the U.S. 2011. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Information.

17.

Fletcher

S. H.

, Strong

, & Villar

(2008). An investigation of the effects of variations in mentor-based induction on the performance of students in California. Teachers College Record, 110(10), 2271–2289.

18.

Fowles

, Butler

J. S.

, Cowen

J. M.

, Streams

M. E.

, & Toma

E. F.

(2013). Public employee quality in a geographic context: A study of rural teachers. The American Review of Public Administration, 44(5), 503–521. doi:10.1177/0275074012474714

19.

Gaylord

, Wallace

, Pickett

A. L.

, and Likins

(Eds.). (2002). Feature issue on paraeducators supporting students with disabilities and at-risk. Impact, 15(2). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute on Community Integration, Research and Training Center on Community Living. Retrieved from http://ici.umn.edu/products/impact/152

20.

Glazerman

S. E.

, Isenberg

, Dolfin

, Bleeker

, Johnson

, Grider

, & Jocobus

(2010). Impacts of comprehensive teacher induction: Final results from a randomized controlled study (NCEE 2010-4028). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20104027/pdf/20104028.pdf

21.

Goldhaber

(2007). Everyone's doing it, but what does teacher testing tell us about teacher effectiveness? Journal of Human Resources, 42(4), 765–794.

22.

Groom

(2006). Building relationships for learning: The developing role of the teaching assistant. Support for Learning, 21(4), 199–203.

23.

Hammerness

, & Matsko

(2012). When context has content: A case study of new teacher induction in the University of Chicago's Urban Teacher Education Program. Urban Education, 48(4), 557–584.

24.

Hanushek

E. A.

(2011). The economic value of higher teacher quality. Economics of Education Review, 30(3), 466–479.

25.

Henry

G. T.

, Bastian

K. C.

, & Smith

A. A.

(2012). Scholarships to recruit the “best and brightest” into teaching: Who is recruited, where do they teach, how effective are they, and how long do they stay? Educational Researcher, 41(3), 83–92.

26.

Hirsch

, Koppich

J. E.

, & Knapp

M. S.

(2011). Revisiting what states are doing to improve the quality of teaching: An update on patterns and trends. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.

27.

Hoy

A. W.

, & Spero

R. B.

(2005). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching: A comparison of four measures. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research Studies, 21(4), 343–356.

28.

Ingersoll

(2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 499–534.

29.

Ingersoll

R. M.

, & Smith

T. M.

(2004). Do teacher induction and mentoring matter? NASSP Bulletin, 88(638), 28–40.

30.

Jackson

C. K.

(2013). Non-cognitive ability, test scores, and teacher quality: Evidence from 9th grade teachers in North Carolina (NBER Working Paper 18624). Cambridge, MA: The National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w18624

31.

Jones

C. R.

, Ratcliff

N. J.

, Sheehan

, & Hunt

G. H.

(2011). An analysis of teachers' and paraeducators' roles and responsibilities with implications for professional development. Early Childhood Education Journal, 40(1), 19–24.

32.

Kane

, Rockoff

, & Staiger

(2008). What does certification tell us about teacher effectiveness? Evidence from New York City. Economics of Education Review, 27(6), 615–631.

33.

Kelly

L. M.

(2004). Why induction matters. Journal of Teacher Education, 55(5), 438–448.

34.

Kennedy

M. M.

(2010). Attribution error and the quest for teacher quality. Educational Researcher, 39(8), 591–598.

35.

Lankford

, Loeb

, & Wyckoff

(2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(1), 37–62.

36.

Loeb

, Kalogrides

, & Beteille

(2012). Effective schools: Teacher hiring, assignment, development, and retention. Education Finance and Policy, 7(3), 269–304.

37.

North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. (2010). Chapter 13—Salary Determination. Raleigh, NC: Public Schools of North Carolina, Department of Public Instruction. Retrieved from http://licensurepublic.dpi.state.nc.us/Licensure%20Manual/Chapter%2013%20Salary%20Determination.pdf.

38.

North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. (2012) Qualifications for paraprofessionals: Establishing a rigorous standard of quality through formal assessments. Raleigh, NC: Public Schools of North Carolina, Department of Public Instruction. http://www.ncpublicschools.org/district-humanresources/tools/qualifications/

39.

North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. (2012). Teacher turnover report: Annual report on the reasons teachers leave 2011–2012. Raleigh, NC: Public Schools of North Carolina, Department of Public Instruction. Retrieved from http://www.dpi.state.nc.us/docs/educatoreffectiveness/surveys/leaving/2011-12turnoverreport.pdf

40.

Nye

, Konstantopoulos

, & Hedges

L. V.

(2004). How large are teacher effects? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(3), 237–257.

41.

Ronfeldt

, Loeb

, & Wyckoff

(2013). How teacher turnover harms student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 4–36.

42.

Rueda

, & Monzo

L. D.

(2002). Apprenticeship for teaching: Professional development issues surrounding the collaborative relationship between teacher and paraeducators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(5), 503–521.

43.

Russell

, Blatchford

, Bassett

, Brown

, & Martin

(2005). The views of teaching assistants in English Key Stage 2 classes on their role, training, and job satisfaction. Educational Research, 47(2), 175–189. doi:10.1080/00131880500104291

44.

Shim

, Hestenes

, & Cassidy

(2004). Teacher structure and child care quality in preschool classrooms. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 19(2), 143–157.

45.

Sosinsky

L. S.

, & Gilliam

W. S.

(2010). Assistant teachers in prekindergarten programs: What roles do lead teachers feel assistants play in classroom management and teaching? Early Education and Development, 22(4), 676–706. doi:10.1080/10409289.2010.497432

46.

Stanulis

R. N.

, & Floden

R. E.

(2009). Intensive mentoring as a way to help beginning teachers develop balanced instruction. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(2), 112–122.

47.

U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Common Core of Data (CCD), State Nonfiscal Public Elementary/Secondary Education Survey Data (2013). State Nonfiscal Reports. 2000–01 v.1c, 2001–02 v.1c, 2002–03 v.1b, 2003–04 v.1b, 2004–05 v.1f, 2005–06 v.1b, 2006–07 v.1c, 2007–08 v.1b, 2008–09 v.1c, 2009–10 v.1b, 2010–11 v.1a. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/stnfis.asp

48.

Villegas

A. M.

, & Clewell

B. C.

(1998). Increasing teacher diversity by tapping the paraprofessional pool. Theory Into Practice, 37(2), 121–130.

49.

Whitebook

, Kipnis

, & Bellm

(2008). Diversity and stratification in California's early care and education workforce. Berkeley, CA: Center for the Study of Child Care Employment, Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, University of California, Berkeley. Retrieved from http://www.irle.berkeley.edu/cscce/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/diversity_stratification08.pdf.