This chapter explores the influence of a youth participatory action research (YPAR) group, viewing the group's efforts as challenges to manifestations of racial inequality in education, such as the inequitable distribution of educational resources. The authors examine how individuals in positions of relative power—teachers, school administrators, and public officials— respond to the group's advocacy efforts. The analysis illustrates the complexity of the group's influence: Some individuals report that the Council sparks meaningful changes, while others have negative reactions. Overall, the chapter sheds light on the ways that YPAR can encourage change in education by incorporating the voices of Black and Latina/o youth into educational policy and practice.
“What really stuck with me was this idea of traditional versus organic forms of leadership… and that it's my responsibility to help my students develop as leaders.” – Ms. Bauman1
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BertrandM. (2014). Reciprocal dialogue between educational decision makers and students of color: Opportunities and obstacles. Educational Administration Quarterly. doi:10.1177/0013161x14542582
2.
CammarotaJ., & FineM. (2008). Youth participatory action research: A pedagogy for transformational resistance. In CammarotaJ. & FineM. (Eds.), Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion (pp. 1–12). New York, NY: Routledge.
3.
Darling-HammondL. (2004a). The color line in American education. Du Bois Review, 1(2), 213–246.
4.
Darling-HammondL. (2004b). Inequality and the right to learn: Access to qualified teachers in California's public schools. Teachers College Record, 106(10), 1936–1966.
5.
EmersonR. M., FretzR. I., & ShawL. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
6.
FaircloughN. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, UK; Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
7.
FaircloughN. (2011). Semiotic aspects of social transformation and learning. In RogersR. (Ed.), An introduction to Critical Discourse Analysis in education (2nd ed., pp. 119–126). New York, NY: Routledge.
8.
FanelliS., BertrandM., RogersJ., MedinaD., & FreelonR. (2010). Before the recession …: Conditions, opportunities, and outcomes in California public schools.UCLA IDEA, UC/ACCORD.
9.
FineM. (2008). An epilogue, of sorts. In CammarotaJ. & FineM. (Eds.), Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion (pp. 213–234). New York, NY: Routledge.
10.
FreireP. (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed (New rev. 20th-Anniversary ed.). New York, NY: Continuum.
11.
GramsciA., HoareQ., & Nowell-SmithG. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci (1st ed.). New York, NY: International Publishers.
12.
Ladson-BillingsG., & TateW. F.IV (1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97(1), 47–68.
13.
LeeS. J. (2005). Up against Whiteness: Race, school, and immigrant youth. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
14.
LeeS. J. (2009). Unraveling the “model minority” stereotype: Listening to Asian American youth (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
15.
Lewis-CharpH., YuH. C., & SoukamneuthS. (2006). Civic activist approaches for engaging youth in social justice. In GinwrightS. A., NogueraP., & CammarotaJ. (Eds.), Beyond Resistance!: Youth activism and community change: New democratic possibilities for practice and policy for America's youth. New York, NY: Routledge.
16.
McIntyreA. (2000). Constructing meaning about violence, school, and community: Participatory action research with urban youth. The Urban Review, 32(2), 123–154.
17.
MitraD. L. (2005). Adults advising youth: Leading while getting out of the way. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(3), 520–553.
18.
MorrellE. (2008a). Critical literacy and urban youth: Pedagogies of access, dissent, and liberation. New York, NY: Routledge.
19.
MorrellE. (2008b). Six summers of YPAR: Learning, action and change in urban education. In CammarotaJ. & FineM. (Eds.), Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion (pp. 155–184). New York, NY: Routledge.
20.
MorrellE., & RogersJ. (2006). Becoming critical public historians: Students study diversity and access in post Brown v. Board Los Angeles. Social Education, 70(6), 366–369.
21.
OatesG. L. S. C. (2003). Teacher–student racial congruence, teacher perceptions, and test performance. Social Science Quarterly, 84(3), 508–525.
22.
RogersJ., FanelliS., & BertrandM. (2009). California's educational opportunity gaps in California Policy Options 2009 (pp. 73–98). Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles, School of Public Affairs.
23.
RogersJ., MorrellE., & EnyedyN. (2007). Studying the struggle: Contexts for learning and identity development for urban youth. American Behavioral Scientist, 51(3), 419–443.
24.
SolórzanoD. G., & YossoT. J. (2001). From racial stereotyping and deficit discourse toward a Critical Race Theory in teacher education. Multicultural Education, Fall, 2–7.
