Social Harmony and Diversity: The Affordances and Constraints of Harmony as an Educational Goal

Abstract

Background/Context

There is a pressing need to consider how citizens should live together, especially in societies that are increasingly ethnically and politically diverse. Even though multicultural education is constructed very differently and serves very different purposes in different national contexts, relatively little attention has been paid to how education systems of countries such as China, Singapore, and the United Arab Emirates give greater emphasis to the concepts of harmony and social cohesion.

Purpose/Objective

This study explores some of the ways in which multicultural education is defined and conceptualized in East Asian countries. This paper draws on the case study of Singapore to interrogate the concept of harmony, investigate the implications of the state incorporating this concept as an educational goal for the public education system, and examine teachers’ understandings of multicultural education.

Research Design

The study adhered to the qualitative case study design. The data consisted primarily of semistructured individual interviews with 24 Singapore secondary social studies teachers, as well as relevant curricular and political documents such as the national Social Studies curriculum, political speeches, and official government publications. Guided by the literature, the interviewers asked questions to surface the participants’ understandings of the definition, purposes, and practices of multicultural education. Subsequently, the interviewers used follow-up questions to probe further and elicit additional description of how the teachers arrived at these understandings. The data analysis, shaped largely by the constant comparative method, was data-driven and inductive.

Conclusions/Recommendations

By illustrating some of the affordances and constraints of incorporating harmony as an educational goal, this study offers multicultural education scholars and teacher educators an opportunity to better understand some of the ways in which multicultural education is conceptualized in East Asian countries with strong Confucian traditions. The findings from this study suggest that a focus on harmony as an educational goal may help facilitate a move away from programs that emphasize the development of individual students’ social and political competencies towards programs and policies designed to promote communal trust and social cohesion. Finally, this study illustrates some of the challenges teachers face when balancing the goals of building trust and harmony within society and interrogating entrenched interests, institutional inequality, and unequal power relations.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

, Bondy

, & Kuhel

(2005). Preservice teacher learning in an unfamiliar setting. Teacher Education Quarterly, 32(2), 41—62.

Allen

D. S.

(2004). A multilingual America? Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 87, 259—280.

Allen

D. S.

(2009). Talking to strangers: Anxieties of citizenship since Brown v. Board of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Alviar-Martin

, & Ho

L. C.

(2011). “So, where do they fit in?” Teachers' perspectives of multi-cultural education and diversity in Singapore. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 127—135.

Ames

R. T.

(1997). Continuing the conversation on Chinese human rights. Ethics and International Affairs, 11, 177—205.

Angle

S. C.

(2008). Human rights and harmony. Human Rights Quarterly, 30, 76—94.

Banks

J. A.

(2007). Educating citizens in a multicultural society (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

Banks

J. A.

(2008). Diversity, group identity, and citizenship education in a global age. Educational Researcher, 37(3), 129—139.

Beauvais

, & Jenson

(2002). Social cohesion: Updating the state of the research. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Policy Research Networks Inc.

10.

Bennett

(2001). Genres of research in multicultural education. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 171—217.

11.

Bickmore

(2006). Democratic social cohesion (assimilation)? Representations of social conflict in Canadian public school curriculum. Canadian Journal of Education, 29(2), 359—386.

12.

Castro

A. J.

(2010). Themes in the research on preservice teachers' views of cultural diversity: Implications for researching millennial preservice teachers. Educational Researcher, 39(3), 198—210.

13.

Council of Europe. (2010). New strategy and Council of Europe action plan for social cohesion. Retrieved from http://www.coe.int/t/dg3/socialpolicies/socialcohesiondev/source/2010Strategy_ActionPlan_SocialCohesion.pdf

14.

Creswell

J. W.

(1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. London: Sage Publications.

15.

Dallmayr

(2002). “Asian values” and global human rights. Philosophy East and West, 52(2), 173—189.

16.

Department of Statistics. (2010). Census of Population 2010. Retrieved from http://www.singstat.gov.sg/publications/publications-and-papers/population#census_of_population_2010

17.

Feiman-Nemser

, & Buchmann

(1987). When is student teaching teacher education? Teaching and Teacher Education, 3, 255—273.

18.

Feng

, & Newton

(2012). Some implications for moral education of the Confucian principle of harmony: learning from sustainability education practice in China. Journal of Moral Education, 41(3), 341—351.

19.

Freeman

(1996). Human rights, democracy and “Asian Values”. The Pacific Review, 9(3), 354.

20.

Garmon

M. A.

(2004). Changing preservice teachers' attitudes/beliefs about diversity: What are the critical factors? Journal of Teacher Education, 55(3), 201—213.

21.

Ganesan

(2004). The political history of ethnic relations in Singapore. In Lai

A. E.

(Ed.), Beyond rituals and riots: Ethnic pluralism and social cohesion in Singapore (pp. 41—64). Singapore: Eastern Universities Press.

22.

Green

, & Preston

(2001). Education and social cohesion: Recentering the debate. Peabody Journal of Education, 76, 247—284.

23.

Green

, Preston

, & Sabates

(2003). Education, equality and social cohesion: A distributional approach. Compare, 33(4), 453—470.

24.

Goh

C. T.

(1997). Shaping our future: Thinking schools, learning nation. Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.sg/media/speeches/1997/020697.htm

25.

Gonzales

M. H.

, Riedel

, Avery

P. G.

, & Sullivan

J. L.

(2001). Rights and obligations in civic education: A content analysis of the National Standards for Civics and Government. Theory and Research in Social Education, 29(1), 109—128.

26.

Hattam

, & Zembylas

(2010). What's anger got to do with it? Towards a post-indignation pedagogy for communities in conflict. Social Identities, 16(1), 23—40.

27.

Helsing

(2007). Regarding uncertainty in teachers and teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 1317—1333.

28.

Hess

D. E.

, & McAvoy

(2015). The political classroom: Evidence and ethics in democratic education. New York, NY: Routledge.

29.

Heyneman

S. P.

, & Todoric-bebic

(2000). A renewed sense for the purposes of schooling: The challenges of education and social cohesion in Asia, Africa, Latin America, Europe and Central Asia. Prospects, 30(2), 145—166.

30.

Hill

(2000). ‘Asian values’ as reverse Orientalism: Singapore. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 41(2), 177—190.

31.

Hirasawa

(2009). Multicultural education in Japan. In Banks

J. A.

(Ed.), The Routledge International Companion to Multicultural Education (pp. 159—168). New York, NY: Routledge.

32.

L. C.

(2009). Global multicultural citizenship education: A Singapore experience. The Social Studies, 100(6), 285—293.

33.

L. C.

(2010). “Don't worry, I'm not going to report you”: Education for citizenship in Singapore. Theory and Research in Social Education, 38(2), 217—247.

34.

L. C.

, Alviar-Martin

, & Leviste

(2014). “There is space, and there are limits”: The challenge of teaching controversial topics in an illiberal democracy. Teachers College Record, 116, 1—28.

35.

L. C.

, & Seow

(2015). Teaching controversial issues in geography: Climate change education in Singapore schools. Theory and Research in Social Education, 43(4), 314—344.

36.

Hong

W.-P.

(2010). Multicultural education in Korea: Its development, remaining issues, and global implications. Asia Pacific Educational Review, 11, 387—395.

37.

Johnson

D. W.

, & Johnson

R. T.

(2005). Essential components of peace education. Theory into Practice, 44(4), 280—292.

38.

Johnson

D. W.

, & Johnson

R. T.

(2010). Peace education in the classroom: Creating effective peace education programs. In Salomon

, & Cairns

(Eds.), Handbook on peace education (pp. 223—240). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.

39.

Kang

S.-W.

(2010). Multicultural education and the rights to education of migrant children in South Korea. Educational Review, 62(3), 287—300.

40.

Kymlicka

(1995). Multicultural citizenship: A liberal theory of minority rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

41.

Ladson-Billings

(1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

42.

Ladson-Billings

(2004). New directions in multicultural education: Complexities, boundaries, and critical race theory. In Banks

J. A.

, & Banks

C. A. M.

(Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (2nd ed., pp. 50—65). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

43.

Lee

K. Y.

(1994). Speech by Senior Minister Lee Kuan Yew at the inauguration of The International Confucianism Association at Beijing on 5 October 1994. Singapore: Retrieved from http://www.nas.gov.sg/archivesonline/speeches/record-details/743163cd-115d-11e3-83d5-0050568939ad

44.

Lee

W. O.

(2004). Concepts and Issues of Asian citizenship: Spirituality, harmony and individuality. In Lee

W. O.

, Grossman

D. L.

, Kennedy

K. J.

, & Fairbrother

G. P.

(Eds.), Citizenship education in Asia and the Pacific. Hong Kong: Kluwer Academic Publishers

45.

(2006). The Confucian ideal of harmony. Philosophy East and West, 56(4), 583—603.

46.

Mahbubani

(1998). The Pacific way. Foreign Affairs, 74(1), 100—111.

47.

Marshall

, & Rossman

G. B.

(2006). Designing qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

48.

May

, & Sleeter

C. E.

(2010). Introduction. Critical multiculturalism: Theory and praxis. In May

, & Sleeter

C. E.

(Eds.), Critical multiculturalism: Theory and praxis. New York, NY: Routledge.

49.

McLaren

(1994). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education (2nd ed.). New York: Longman Publishing Group.

50.

Merriam

S. B.

(2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

51.

Miller-Lane

, Howard

T. C.

, & Halagao

P. E.

(2007). Civic multicultural competence: Searching for common ground in democratic education. Theory and Research in Social Education, 35(4), 551—573.

52.

Miles

M. B.

, & Huberman

A. M.

(1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

53.

Mueller

, & O'Connor

(2007). Telling and retelling about self and “others”: How pre-service teachers (re)interpret privilege and disadvantage in one college classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 840—856.

54.

Neo

J. L.-C.

(2011). Seditious in Singapore! Free speech and the offence of promoting ill-will and hostility between different racial groups. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, December 2011, 1—22.

55.

Nieto

, Bode

, Kang

, & Raible

(2008). Identity, community, and diversity: Retheorizing multicultural curriculum for the postmodern era. In Connelly

F. M.

, He

, & Phillion

(Eds.), Handbook of curriculum and instruction (pp. 176–197). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

56.

Nuyen

A. T.

(2002). Confucianism and the idea of citizenship. Asian Philosophy, 12(2), 127—139.

57.

O'Dwyer

(2003). Democracy and Confucian values. Philosophy East and West, 53(1), 39—63.

58.

Oldfield

(1990). Citizenship: An unnatural practice? Political Quarterly, 61(2), 177—187.

59.

Pang

V. O.

, & Gibson

(2001). Concepts of democracy and citizenship: Views of African American teachers. The Social Studies, 92(6), 260—266.

60.

Parker

W. C.

(2003). Teaching democracy: Unity and diversity in public life. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

61.

Parliament of Singapore. (1991). Shared Values White Paper: Cmd. 1 of 1991.

62.

Pohan

C. A.

(1996). Preservice teachers' beliefs about diversity: Uncovering factors leading to multicultural responsiveness. Equity & Excellence in Education, 29(3), 62—69.

63.

Putnam

R. D.

(2001). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.

64.

Rajah

(2013). Speech by Ms. Indranee Rajah, Senior Minister of State, Ministry of Law and Ministry of Education, at The Opening Ceremony of The Fifth Redesigning Pedagogy International Conference on Monday, 3 June 2013, 9:55 am at The National Institute of Education Sports Hall, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.sg/news/speeches/speech-by-ms-indranee-rajah—senior-minister-of-state—ministry-of-law-and-ministry-of-education—at-the-opening-ceremony-of-the-fifth-redesigning-pedagogy-international-conference-at-the-national-institute-of-education-sports-hall

65.

Richardson

P. M.

(2004). Possible influences of Arabic-Islamic culture on the reflective practices proposed for an education degree at the Higher Colleges of Technology in the United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Educational Development, 24, 429—436.

66.

Santoro

, & Allard

(2005). (Re)Examining identities: Working with diversity in the pre-service teaching experience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(7), 863—873.

67.

Singapore Ministry of Education. (2007a). Report of the Committee on National Education. Singapore: Ministry of Education.

68.

Singapore Ministry of Education. (2007b). Upper secondary social studies 3. Singapore: EPB Pan Pacific.

69.

Singapore Ministry of Education. (2008, Feb 23, 2008). Combined Humanities Ordinary Level Social Studies Syllabus (Syllabus 2192). Retrieved from http://www.seab.gov.sg/content/syllabus/olevel/2017Syllabus/2204_2017.pdf

70.

Singapore Ministry of Education. (2013). 2014 Syllabus Character and Citizenship Education (Secondary). Singapore: Singapore Ministry of Education.

71.

Sleeter

C. E.

(2010). Probing beneath meanings of multicultural education. Multicultural Education Review, 2(1), 1—24.

72.

Sleeter

C. E.

, & Grant

C. A.

(1987). An analysis of multicultural education in the United States. Harvard Educational Review, 57(4), 421—444.

73.

Spillane

J. P.

(1999). External reform initiatives and teachers' efforts to reconstruct their practice: The mediating role of teachers' zones of enactment. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(2), 143—175.

74.

Taylor

(1994). The politics of recognition. In Gutmann

(Ed.), Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

75.

Tesch

(1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. New York: Falmer.

76.

W.-m.

(1996). Confucian traditions in East Asian modernity. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 50(2), 12—39.

77.

W.-m.

(2008). The rise of industrial East Asia: The role of Confucian values. The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies, 4(1), 81—97.

78.

van den Berg

(2002). Teachers' meanings regarding educational practice. Review of Educational Research, 72(4), 577—625.

79.

Wan

(2004). Ethnic diversity and citizenship education in the People's Republic of China. In Banks

J. A.

(Ed.), Diversity and citizenship education: Global perspectives (pp. 355—376). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

80.

Whipp

J. L.

(2013). Developing social just teachers: The interaction of experiences before, during, and after teacher preparation in beginning urban teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 454—467.

81.

Young

I. M.

(2002). Inclusion and democracy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

82.

Zakaria

(1997). The rise of illiberal democracy. Foreign Affairs, 76(6), 22—43.

83.

Zembylas

(2009). Affect, citizenship, politics: Implications for education. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 17(3), 369—383.