A significant body of scholarship has highlighted the importance of improvisation in teaching, particularly the interactional and responsive creativity that is required for teachers to co-construct meaning with students. However, recent efforts inside and outside university-based teacher education have pushed against novice teacher learning through improvisation, preferring to focus on the “practicing” of identifiable components or discrete techniques of teaching.
Purpose
Based on an expansive view of practice, I argue that improvisation is inextricably connected to practice and illustrate that the marginalization of improvisation limits opportunities for novice teachers to learn the relational aspects of teaching. I develop the concept of principled improvisation: improvisation that is purposefully oriented toward justice and that accentuates each moment of teaching as political, ethical, and consequential. I describe the design of a learning environment for preservice teachers that was organized around principled improvisation and demonstrate its unique affordances for particular forms of novice teacher learning.
Research Design
Based on a close reading of novice teachers’ weekly reflections and audio recordings and field notes from the whole-class discussions, I highlight five examples of practice guided by principled improvisation that span a diversity of participants, contexts, and scale. These illustrative cases are not meant to systematically characterize all instances of practice guided by principled improvisation in the course; rather, they are meant to be invitations to grapple with new pedagogical and learning possibilities (and limitations) that emerge when teacher education is organized around principled improvisation. In particular, I explore how learning to listen played prominently in teacher practice guided by principled improvisation and examine how the opportunity to narrate, re-narrate, and re-envision experiences allowed novice teachers to learn and collectively build place-relevant theory.
Conclusions
The opportunities to learn to recognize emotion, listen, see race in place, consider political expression, and make sense of power across scales were significant aspects of the relational work of teachers that were learned by organizing novice teacher learning around principled improvisation. These forms of learning could not have taken place if the experiences of the novice teacher were only organized around the rehearsal of components of teaching. It required teaching in a complex space that connects self and interactions in place to larger structures and ideologies in society.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AuW. (2011). Teaching under the new Taylorism: High stakes testing and the standardization of the 21 century curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(1), 25—45.
2.
BallD. L., ForzaniF. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497—511.
3.
BallD. L., SleepL., BoerstT., & BassH. (2009). Combining the development of practice and the practice of development in teacher education. Elementary School Journal, 109, 458—476.
4.
BangM., FaberL., GurneauJ., MarinA., & SotoC. (2016). Community-based design research: Learning across generations and strategic transformations of institutional relations toward axiological innovations. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(1), 28—41.
5.
BangM., WarrenB., RoseberyA. S., & MedinD. (2012). De-settling expectations in science education. Human Development, 55(5), 243—358.
6.
BernalD. D. (1998). Grassroots leadership reconceptualized: Chicana oral histories and the 1968 East Los Angeles school blowouts. Frontiers, 19(2), 113—142.
7.
BoalA. (1985). Theater of the oppressed. New York, NY: Theatre Communications Group.
8.
BoggsC. (1977). Marxism, prefigurative communism, and the problem of workers' control. Radical America, 11(6), 99—122.
CroccoM. S., & CostiganA. T. (2007). The narrowing of curriculum and pedagogy in the age of accountability: Urban educators speak out. Urban Education, 42(6), 512—535.
12.
Darling-HammondL. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1—44.
DeweyJ. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York, NY: The Macmillan Company.
15.
DeweyJ. (1922). Human nature and conduct: An introduction to social psychology. New York, NY: Carlton House.
16.
EricksonF. (2003). Foreword. In SchultzK., Listening: A framework for teaching across differences (pp. ix—xi). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
17.
FreemanQ., & JurowA. S. (2018). Becoming a more disruptive teacher. In MendozaE., KirshnerB., & GutiérrezK. (Eds.), Power, equity, and (re)design: Bridging learning and critical theories in learning ecologies for youth (pp. 35—52). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
18.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.
19.
GrossmanP., HammernessK., & McDonaldM. (2009). Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching, Theory and Practice, 15(2), 273—289.
20.
GrossmanP., & McDonaldM. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 184—205.
21.
HaqueO. S., & WaytzA. (2012). Dehumanization in medicine: Causes, solutions, and functions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(2), 176—186.
22.
HessD., & McAvoyP. (2015). The political classroom: Evidence and ethics in democratic education. New York, NY: Routledge.
23.
HickeyM. (2009). Can improvisation be “taught”? A call for free improvisation in our schools. International Journal of Music Education, 27(4), 285—299.
24.
HollandD., LachicotteW., SkinnerD., & CainC. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
hooksb. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York, NY: Routledge.
26.
HornI. S. (2010). Teaching replays, teaching rehearsals, and re-visions of practice: Learning from colleagues in a mathematics teacher community. Teachers College Record, 112(1), 225—259.
27.
HornI. S. (2016). Accountability as a design for teacher learning: Sensemaking about mathematics and equity in the NCLB era. Urban Education, 53(3), 382—408.
28.
JacksonK. (2009). The social construction of youth and mathematics: The case of a fifth-grade classroom. In MartinD. (Ed.), Mathematics teaching, learning, and liberation in the lives of Black children (pp. 175—199). London, England: Routledge.
29.
JaggarA. M. (2015). Ideal and non ideal reasoning in educational theory. Educational Theory, 65(2), 111—126.
30.
JurowA. S., & CreightonL. (2005). Improvisational science discourse: Teaching science in two K–1 classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 16(3), 275—297.
31.
KennedyM. (2016). Parsing the practice of teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(1), 6—17.
LampertM. (2010). Learning teaching in, from, and for practice: What do we mean?Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 21—34.
34.
Langer-OsunaJ. (2016). The social construction of authority among peers and its implications for collaborative mathematics problem solving. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 18(2), 107—124.
35.
LaveJ. (2012). Changing practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19(2), 156—171.
LemovD. (2010). Teach like a champion: 49 techniques that put students on the path to college (K–12). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
38.
LipsitzG. (1998). The possessive investment in Whiteness: How White people profit from identity politics. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
39.
MartinD. B. (2009). Researching race in mathematics education. Teachers College Record, 111(2), 295—338.
40.
McNeilL. I. M. (1999). Contradictions of control: School structure and school knowledge. New York, NY: Routledge.
41.
MehtaJ. (2013). The penetration of technocratic logic into the educational field: Rationalizing schooling from the progressives to the present. Teachers College Record, 115(5), 1—36.
42.
MillsC. W. (2005). “Ideal theory” as ideology. Hypatia, 20(3), 165—184.
NeumannM., EdelhäuserF., TauschelD., FischerM. R., WirtzM., & WoopenC (2011). Empathy decline and its reasons: A systematic review of studies with medical students and residents. Academic Medicine, 86(8), 996—1009.
45.
OmiM., & WinantH. (1994). Racial formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s. New York, NY: Routledge.
46.
PhilipT. M. (2011). An “ideology in pieces” approach to studying change in teachers' sense-making about race, racism and racial justice. Cognition and Instruction, 29(3), 297—329.
47.
PhilipT. M. (2013a). Articulating the purpose of a social foundations of education course through instructor self-interviews. Studying Teacher Education, 9(3), 203—218.
48.
PhilipT. M. (2013b). Experience as college student activists: A strength and liability for prospective teachers of color in urban schools. Urban Education, 48(1), 44—68.
49.
PhilipT. M., BangM., & JacksonK. (2018). Articulating the “how,” the “for what,” the “for whom,” and the “with whom” in concert: A call to broaden the benchmarks of our scholarship. Cognition and Instruction, 36(2), 83—88.
50.
PhilipT. M., Olivares-PasillasM. C., & RochaJ. (2016). Becoming racially literate about data and data literate about race: A case of data visualizations in the classroom as a site of racial-ideological micro-contestations. Cognition and Instruction, 34(4), 361—388.
51.
PhilipT. M., RochaJ., & Olivares-PasillasM. C. (2017). Supporting teachers of color as they negotiate classroom pedagogies of race: A case study of a teacher's struggle with “friendly-fire” racism. Teacher Education Quarterly, 44(1), 59—79.
52.
PhilipT. M., Souto-ManningM., AndersonL., HornL., Carter AndrewsD., StillmanJ., & VargheseM. (2018). Making justice peripheral by constructing practice as “core”: How the increasing prominence of core practices challenges teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education. Advance online publication. Retrieved from https://journals-sagepub-com-s.web.bisu.edu.cn/doi/10.1177/0022487118798324
53.
PhilipT. M., & ZavalaM. (2016). The possibilities of being “critical”: Discourses that limit options for educators of color. Urban Education, 51(6), 659—682.
RittelH. W. J., & WebberM. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155—169.
56.
RoseberyA., OgonowskiM., DiSchinoM., & WarrenB. (2010). “The coat traps all your body heat”: Heterogeneity as fundamental to learning. Journal of Learning Sciences, 19(3), 322—357.
57.
SawyerR. K. (2000). Improvisational cultures: Collaborative emergence and creativity in improvisation. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(3), 180—185.
58.
SawyerR. K. (2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 12—20.
59.
SchultzK. (2003). Listening: A framework for teaching across differences. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
60.
SmagorinskyP., LaklyA., & JohnsonT. S. (2002). Acquiescence, accommodation, and resistance in learning to teach within a prescribed curriculum. English Education, 34, 187—211.
61.
Souto-ManningM. (2010). Freire, teaching, and learning: Culture circles across contexts. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
62.
Souto-ManningM., & MartellJ. (2019). Toward critically transformative possibilities: Considering tensions and undoing inequities in the spatialization of teacher education. Teachers College Record, 121(4).
SwadenerB., & LubeckS. (Eds.). (1995). Children and families “at promise”: Deconstructing the discourse of risk. Albany: State University of New York Press.
ValenciaR. R. (2010). Dismantling contemporary deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
68.
VossoughiS., HooperP., & EscudéM. (2016). Making through the lens of culture and power: Towards transformative visions for educational equity. Harvard Educational Review, 86(2), 206—232.
69.
WarrenB., OgonowskiM., & PothierS. (2005). “Everyday” and “scientific”: Re-thinking dichotomies in modes of thinking in science learning. In NemirovskyR., RoseberyA., SolomonJ., & WarrenB. (Eds.), Everyday matters in science and mathematics: Studies of complex classroom events (pp. 119—148). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
70.
WorthamS. (2004). The interdependence of social identification and learning. American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 715—750.
71.
WorthamS. (2006). Learning identity: The joint emergence of social identification and academic learning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
72.
ZavalaM. (2018). Raza struggle and the movement for ethnic studies: Decolonial pedagogies, literacies, and methodologies. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
73.
ZavalaM., & GoldenN. A. (2016). Prefiguring alternative worlds: Organic critical literacies and socio-cultural revolutions. Knowledge Cultures, 4(6), 207—227.
