The Organizational Ecology of State Support for Public Flagship Universities

Abstract

Background/Context:

Several studies have investigated state political and economic factors that explain differences in levels of state appropriations for colleges and universities. Few studies have considered how stakeholder beliefs or taken-for-granted assumptions about various institutions may impact budgeting decisions for specific campuses. A gap in the literature remains in understanding how normative agreements about various institutional types—such as public flagship universities—may influence levels of state appropriations for these institutions.

Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study:

This study investigates how levels of state support for research universities might relate to their formal, informal, or even contested status as public flagship institutions. The research question guiding this study is: How might flagship identity relate to differences in levels of state appropriations for public research universities across states?

Research Design:

This multicase study examines differences in levels of state support for four flagship universities between 1984 and 2004. Case institutions were generated from an analysis of outlier institutions that received lower- or higher-than-predicted levels of appropriations during the two-decade period. Outliers analyzed for this study include the University of Massachusetts-Amherst and University of Virginia (lower-than-predicted support) and the University of Connecticut and the University of Maryland-College Park (higher-than-predicted support). Qualitative data were collected and analyzed to investigate disparities in state support among these four institutions.

Findings/Results:

This study found that a “flagship ideal” exists across the four cases, which provides meaning for stakeholders as they consider levels of state funding for these institutions. Idealized views of flagships provided advantages to some institutions and disadvantaged others in state budgeting processes during the study period. In addition, normative beliefs about the case institutions were mediated by state culture, politics, and powerful regional influences. Higher education governance structure was less important than cultural and political context in making sense of variations in state support across the institutions.

Conclusions/Recommendations:

The study suggests that flagship university leaders must be mindful about taken-for-granted assumptions held by key stakeholders and resource providers as they create appeals for state support. Across all institutional types, leaders must be attuned to the historical, cultural, economic, or political factors that shape understandings about their institutions. In addition, leaders must evaluate the influence of allies or foes in shaping the narrative about the institution’s unique identity and need for funding. Strategic leaders leverage their institutional identities and unique governing arrangements in ways that expand resource opportunities.

Keywords

research universities flagship funding organizational ecology politics governance culture

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albert

(1998). The definition and metadefinition of identity. In Whetten

D. A.

Godfrey

P. C.

(Eds.), Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations (pp. 1–13). Sage.

American Academy of Arts & Sciences. (2015). Public research universities: Changes in state funding. https://www.amacad.org/publication/public-research-universities-changes-state-funding

American Academy of Arts & Sciences. (2017). The Lincoln project: Excellence and access in public higher education. https://www.amacad.org/content/Research/researchproject.aspx?d=929

Baron

J. N.

(2004). Employing identities in organizational ecology. Industry and Corporate Change, 13, 3–32.

Bastedo

M. N.

(2005). Thwarted ambition: The role of public policy in university development. New England Journal of Public Policy, 20(2), 45–65.

Berdahl

R. M.

(1998, October 5). The future of flagship universities [Address]. Texas A&M University Convocation. http://cio.chance.berkeley.edu/chancellor/sp/flagship.htm

Berdahl

Sample

Rall

R. M.

(2014). Are systems bad for flagships? Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2014/03/07/are-state-systems-endangering-our-public-flagship-universities-essay

Bogdan

R. C.

Bicklen

S. K.

(1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Simon & Schuster.

Bruggeman

Nualláin

B. Ó

. (2000). A niche width model of optimal specialization. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 6, 161–170.

10.

Cantwell

Byrd

W. C.

(2021). The ‘flagship’ folly. Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/the-flagship-folly

11.

Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. (2021). Home page. https://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu

12.

Clark

(1970). The distinctive college: Antioch, Reed, and Swarthmore. Aldine.

13.

College Board. (2017). Trends in college pricing. https://research.collegeboard.org/pdf/trends-college-pricing-2017-full-report.pdf

14.

Couturier

L. K.

(2006). Checks and balances at work: The restructuring of Virginia’s public higher education system. National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education.

15.

Creswell

J. W.

(2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.

16.

Delaney

J. A.

Doyle

W. R.

(2011). State spending on higher education: Testing the balance wheel over time. Journal of Education Finance, 36(4), 343–368.

17.

Delaney

J. A.

Doyle

W. R.

(2018). Patterns and volatility in state funding for higher education, 1951– 2006. Teachers College Record, 120(6), 1–42.

18.

Halprin

D. R.

(2015). The influence of organizational ecology research on population ecology of interest representation: Present practices and future prospects. In Lowery

Halprin

Gray

(Eds.), The organization ecology of interest communities: Assessment and agenda (pp. 225–247). Palgrave Macmillan.

19.

Hannan

M. T.

(2005). Ecologies of organizations: Diversity and identity. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(1), 51–70.

20.

Hannan

M. T.

Freeman

(1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929–964.

21.

Hannan

M. T.

Polos

Carroll

G. R.

(2005). Social codes and ecologies: Logics of organization theory. Stanford Graduate School of Business.

22.

Hannon

(2015). What to call UB: SUNY Buffalo’s identity crisis. The Herd Report. http://www.theherdreport.com/posts/2015/4/23/what-to-call-ub-suny-buffalos-identity-crisis

23.

Haveman

David

(2008). Ecologists and institutionalists: Friends or foes? In Greenwood

Oliver

Sahlin

Suddaby

(Eds.), Handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 573–590). Oxford University Press.

24.

Haycock

Lynch

Engle

(2010). Opportunity adrift: Our flagship universities are straying from their public mission. Education Trust. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED507851

25.

Hinds

P. S.

Vogel

R. J.

Clarke-Steffen

L. L.

(1997). The possibilities and pitfalls of doing a secondary analysis of a qualitative data set. Qualitative Health Research, 7(3), 408–424.

26.

Hsu

Hannan

M. T.

(2005). Identities, genres, and organizational forms. Organizational Science, 16(5), 474–490.

27.

Jaquette

(2017). State university no more: Out-of-state enrollment and the growing exclusion of high achieving, low-income students at flagship public universities. Jack Kent Cooke Foundation.

28.

Johnstone

D. B.

(2013). Higher education autonomy and the apportionment of authority among state governments, multi-campus systems, and member colleges and universities. In Lane

J. E.

Johnstone

D. B.

(Eds.), Higher education systems 3.0: Harnessing systemness, delivering performance (pp. 75–100). State University System of New York.

29.

Lacy

T. A.

Fowles

Tandberg

D. A.

(2017). U.S. state higher education appropriations: Assessing the relationships between agency politicization, centralization, and volatility. Policy and Society, 36(1), 16–33.

30.

Lincoln

Y. S.

Guba

E. G.

(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

31.

Lowery

Gray

(2015). An introduction to the population ecology approach. In Lowery

Halpin

Gray

(Eds.), The organizational ecology of interest communities (pp. 1–15). Palgrave Macmillan.

32.

Lowry

R. C.

(2001). The effects of state political interests and campus outputs on public university revenues. Economics of Education Review, 20(2), 105–119.

33.

March

J. G.

(1981). Decisions in organizations and theories of choice. In de Ven

A. H. Van

Joyce

(Eds.), Perspectives on organization design and behavior (pp. 205–244). Wiley.

34.

Martin

(2005). A drift toward elitism by the ‘people’s universities.’ Chronicle of Higher Education, 51(25), B26. http://chronicle.com/article/A-Drift-Toward-Elitism-by-the/15465

35.

McKendrick

D. G.

Carroll

G. R.

(2001). On the genesis of organizational forms: Evidence from the market for disk drive arrays. Organization Science, 12(6), 661–683.

36.

McLendon

M. K.

(2003). The politics of higher education: Toward an expanded research agenda. Educational Policy, 17(1), 165–191.

37.

McLendon

M. K.

Hearn

J. C.

Mokher

C. G.

(2009). Partisans, professionals, and power: The role of political factors in state higher education funding. The Journal of Higher Education, 80(6), 686–713.

38.

McLendon

M. K.

Mokher

C. G.

Doyle

(2009). Privileging public research universities: An empirical analysis of the distribution of state appropriations across research and non-research universities. Journal of Education Finance, 34(4), 372–401.

39.

McLendon

M. K.

Tandberg

D. A.

Hillman

N. A.

(2014). Financing college opportunity: Factors influencing state spending on student financial aid and campus appropriations, 1990 through 2010. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 655(1), 143–162.

40.

Merriam

S. B.

(2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.

41.

Meyer

J. W.

Rowan

(1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.

42.

Padgett

Ansell

(1993). Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400–1434. American Journal of Sociology, 98(6), 1259–1319.

43.

Palmer

(2019). Public flagships are less affordable than you might think. Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/Public-Flagships-Are-Less/247080

44.

Peters

(2015). A democracy’s college tradition. In Boyte

H. C.

(Ed.), Democracy’s education: Public work, citizenship, and the future of higher education (pp. 44–52). Vanderbilt University Press.

45.

Polos

Hannan

M. T.

Carroll

G. R.

(2002). Foundations of a theory of social forms. Industry and Corporate Change, 11(1), 85–115.

46.

Popielarz

P. A.

Neal

Z. P.

(2007). The niche as a theoretical tool. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 65–78.

47.

Puusa

(2006). Conducting research on organizational identity. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 11(2), 24–28.

48.

Rabinowitz

(1995). UConn to get $1 billion for a face lift. New York Times, B-1, B-6.

49.

Riotta

(2017). Majority of Republicans say colleges are bad for America (yes, really). Newsweek. http://www.newsweek.com/republicans-believe-college-education-bad-america-donald-trump-media-fake-news-634474

50.

Rizzo

M. J.

(2006). State preferences for higher education spending: A panel data analysis, 1977–2001. In Ehrenberg

(Ed.), What’s happening to public higher education? (pp. 3–36). Praeger.

51.

Rizzo

M. J.

Ehrenberg

(2004). Resident and non-resident tuition and enrollment at state flagship universities. In Hoxby

C. M.

(Ed.), College choices: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it (pp. 303–354). University of Chicago Press.

52.

Ross

(2020). What might COVID-19 mean for the World University Rankings? Times Higher Education. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/what-might-covid-19-mean-world-university-rankings

53.

Ruggiano

Perry

T. E.

(2019). Conducting secondary analysis of qualitative data: Should we, can we, and how? Qualitative Social Work, 18(1), 81–97.

54.

Stark

(1996). Recombinant property in East European capitalism. American Journal of Sociology, 101(4), 993–1027.

55.

Stave

B. M.

(2006). Red brick in the land of steady habits: Creating the University of Connecticut, 1881– 2006. University Press of New England.

56.

Stripling

(2011). Flagships just want to be alone. Chronicle of Higher Education. http://chronicle.com/article/Flagships-Just-Want-to-Be/126696/

57.

Tandberg

D. A.

(2010). Interest groups and governmental institutions: The politics of state funding for public higher education. Educational Policy, 24(5), 735–778.

58.

Tandberg

D. A.

(2013). The conditioning role of state higher education governance structures. Journal of Higher Education, 84(4), 506–543.

59.

Task Force to Study the Governance, Coordination, and Funding of the University System of Maryland. (1998). Report of the Task Force to Study the Governance, Coordination, and Funding of the University System of Maryland. Maryland State Department of Legislative Services. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED428622.pdf

60.

Wästerfors

Åkerström

Jacobsson

(2014). Reanalysis of qualitative data. In Uwe

(Ed.), The Sage handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 467–480). Sage.

61.

Weerts

D. J.

(2002). State governments and research universities: A framework for a renewed partnership. Routledge.

62.

Weerts

D. J.

(2014). State funding and the engaged university: Understanding community engagement and state appropriations for higher education. Review of Higher Education, 38(1), 133–169.

63.

Weerts

D. J.

Freed

G. F.

Morphew

C. C.

(2014). Organizational identity in higher education: Conceptual and empirical perspectives. In Bastedo

M. N.

(Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 29, pp. 229–278): Springer.

64.

Weerts

D. J.

Ronca

J. M.

(2012). Understanding differences in state support for higher education across states, sectors, and institutions: A longitudinal study. Journal of Higher Education, 83(2), 155–185.

65.

Yin

R. K.

(2003). Case study research: Designs and methods (3rd ed.). Sage.

66.

Zuckerman

E. W.

Kim

Ukanwa

von Rittman

(2003). Robust identities or non-entities? Typecasting in the feature film labor market. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 1018–1074.