Teachers for Immigrant Students: A Systematic Literature Review Across Hong Kong,Turkey,and the United States

Abstract

Background:

Diversity across the world is changing, given the growing number of immigrant children in schools. These increases in transnational mobility have teachers struggling to reconsider their everyday practices to accommodate many more newcomers in their classrooms. The need for teachers to become more responsive to changing social conditions and student populations is gaining urgency.

Purpose:

Our purpose in this study is to gain insight into what the literature says about educating immigrant children through the lens of social justice in Turkey, the United States, and Hong Kong, as each context presents a distinct case of immigration.

Research Design:

We conduct a systematic literature review on 87 articles, selected from teaching and teacher education journals. In light of documented inequities experienced by immigrant children, we conduct our review within a framework of teaching immigrant students globally within, versus parallel to, the field of teaching for social justice.

Findings:

Through cross-jurisdiction inquiry, our findings reveal both examples and counterexamples of teaching for social justice, categorized into three cross-cutting themes: (a) Ways of Teaching, (b) Ways of Knowing, and (c) Ways of Seeing. Among the literature, we found a significant focus on language acquisition in the teaching of immigrant students. Another pattern was the ways in which teachers and teacher education value (or not) immigrant students’ funds of knowledge by building on (or rejecting) what students and their communities bring to their learning. Finally, our review demonstrated how teacher educators and teachers encourage, challenge, and teach preservice teachers and students to work against institutional and societal structures that are oppressive for immigrant students.

Conclusion:

The global reality of superdiversity among immigrant students calls on teachers to be pedagogically adept to respect and support multiple ways of teaching, knowing, and seeing. Research on social justice education for immigrants needs to move beyond language acquisition/deficit as the primary lens for analysis to consider the assets that immigrants bring to classrooms. Despite the differences in the experiences of (im)migrant students in each of the national contexts, social justice must be embedded in teacher education to ensure inclusive and culturally responsive teaching for all.

Keywords

teacher education social justice immigrants immigration literature review

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adair

J. K.

Sanchez-Suzuki Colegrove

McManus

M. E.

(2017). How the word gap argument negatively impacts young children of Latinx immigrants’ conceptualizations of learning. Harvard Educational Review, 87(3), 309–334.

Agarwal

Epstein

Oppenheim

Oyler

Sonu

(2010). From ideal to practice and back again: Beginning teachers teaching for social justice. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(3), 237–247.

Allard

E. C.

(2015). Undocumented status and schooling for newcomer teens. Harvard Educational Review, 85(3), 478–501.

American Psychological Association. (2012). Ethnic and racial disparities in education: Psychology’s contributions to understanding and reducing disparities [Presidential Task Force on Educational Disparities]. http://www.apa.org/ed/resources/racial-disparities.aspx

Arslangilay

A. S.

(2018). Are Turkish teacher candidates ready for migrant students? Journal of Education and Learning, 7(2), 316–329.

Aydin

Kaya

(2017). The educational needs of and barriers faced by Syrian refugee students in Turkey: A qualitative case study. Intercultural Education, 28(5), 456–473.

Aydoğdu

Asmaz

(2019). Yabancı dil olarak Türkçede kelime öğretimi üzerine bir durum tespiti: Suriyeli ortaokul öğrencilerine Türkçe öğreten öğretmenler örneği [A quantitative study on the vocabulary teaching of teachers teaching Turkish to Syrian secondary school students]. International Journal of Teaching Turkish as a Foreign Language, 2(2), 152–164.

Aykırı

(2017). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin sınıflarındaki Suriyeli öğrencilerin eğitim durumlarına ilişkin görüşleri [Determination of the experiences of social studies teacher candidates on the projects of community service practices]. Turkish Journal of Primary Education, 2(1), 44–56.

Bajaj

Argenal

Canlas

(2017). Socio-politically relevant pedagogy for immigrant and refugee youth. Equity & Excellence in Education, 50(3), 258–274.

10.

Balkar

Şahin

Işıklı-Babahan

(2016). Geçici eğitim merkezlerinde (GEM) görev yapan Suriyeli öğretmenlerin karşılaştıkları sorunlar [Problems confronted by Syrian teachers working at temporary education centers (TECs)]. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 12(6), 1290–1310.

11.

Başar

Akan

Çiftçi

(2018). Mülteci öğrencilerin bulunduğu sınıflarda öğrenme sürecinde karşılaşılan sorunlar [Learning-teaching process issues in classrooms with refugee students]. Kastamonu Education Journal, 26(5), 1571–1578.

12.

Bhowmik

M. K.

Kennedy

K. J.

Hue

M. T.

(2018). Education for all—But not Hong Kong’s ethnic minority students. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(5), 661–679.

13.

Biçer

Kılıç

B. S.

(2017). Suriyeli öğrencilere Türkçe öğretmek için kullanılan ders kitaplarının öğretmen görüşleri doğrultusunda değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of textbooks which are used for teaching Turkish to Syrian students based on teacher opinions]. Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi [Journal of Mother Tongue Education], 5(4), 649–663.

14.

Boser

(2014). Teacher diversity revisited: A new state-by-state analysis. Center for American Progress. https://cdn.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/TeacherDiversity.pdf

15.

Boylan

Woolsey

(2015). Teacher education for social justice: Mapping identity spaces. Teaching and Teacher Education, 46, 62–71.

16.

Buchanan

L. B.

Hilburn

(2016). Riding la Bestia: Preservice teachers’ responses to documentary counterstories of U.S. immigration. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(5), 408–423.

17.

Bulut

Kanat-Soysal

Ö.

Gülçiçek

(2018). Suriyeli öğrencilerin Türkçe öğretmeni olmak: Suriyeli öğrencilerin eğitiminde karşılaşılan sorunlar [Being a Turkish language teacher of Syrian refugee students: Challenges and issues]. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim Dergisi [International Journal of Turkish Literature Culture Education], 7(2), 1210–1238.

18.

Caldas

(2018). “More meaningful to do it than just reading it”: Rehearsing praxis among Mexican-American/Latinx pre-service teachers. Teaching Education, 29(4), 370–382.

19.

Carhill-Poza

(2018). Silence partners: Language learning and the role of bilingual peers in high school. Teachers College Press, 120(11), 1–28.

20.

Carter

Darling-Hammond

(2016). Teaching diverse learners. In Gitomer

Bell

C. A.

(Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 593–638). American Educational Research Association.

21.

Carver-Thomas

(2018). Diversifying the teaching profession: How to recruit and retain teachers of color. Learning Policy Institute.

22.

Chou

(2010, October). Preparing teacher educators for diversity: Complexities and challenges [Paper presentation]. Scientific Meeting of the OECD International Seminar on Teacher Education for Diversity, Brussels, Belgium.

23.

Çoban-Sural

Ü.

Güler-Arı

. (2017). Göçmen çocuklara Türkçe eğitimi veren öğretmenlerin aldıkları hizmet içi eğitimin değerlendirilmesi [The evaluation of in-service training of the instructors teaching Turkish for immigrant children]. International Journal of Languages’ Education and Teaching, 5(4), 996–1009.

24.

Cochran-Smith

(2004). Walking the road: Race, diversity and social justice in teacher education. Teachers College Press.

25.

Cochran-Smith

(2010). Toward a theory of teacher education for social justice. In Hargreaves

Lieberman

Fullan

Hopkins

(Eds.), Second international handbook of educational change (pp. 445–467). Springer.

26.

Cochran-Smith

Grudnoff

Orland-Barak

Smith

(2020). Educating teacher educators: International perspectives. The New Educator, 16(1), 5–24.

27.

Cochran-Smith

Shakman

Jong

Terrell

D. G.

Barnatt

McQuillan

(2009). Good and just teaching: The case for social justice in teacher education. American Journal of Education, 115(3), 347–377.

28.

Cochran-Smith

Villegas

A. M.

Abrams

L. W.

Chávez-Moreno

L. C.

Mills

Stern

(2016). Research on teacher preparation: Charting the landscape of a sprawling field. In Gitomer

Bell

C. A.

(Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 439–547). American Educational Research Association.

29.

Dabach

D. B.

(2015). Teacher placement into immigrant English learner classrooms: Limiting access in comprehensive high schools. American Educational Research Journal, 52(2), 243–274.

30.

European Commission. (2013a). Education and training in Europe 2020: Responses from the EU member states. Eurydice.

31.

European Commission. (2013b). Supporting teacher competence development for better learning outcomes. http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/repository/education/policy/school/doc/teachercomp_en.pdf

32.

Feak

C. B.

Swales

J. M.

(2009). Telling a research story: Writing a literature review. University of Michigan Press.

33.

Gallagher

(2019). The use of a multimedia case to prepare classroom teachers of emergent bilinguals. Teaching and Teacher Education, 84, 17–29.

34.

Galman

Pica-Smith

Rosenberger

(2010). Aggressive and tender navigations: Teacher educators confront Whiteness in their practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(3), 225–236.

35.

Gershenson

Hart

Lindsay

Papageorge

(2017). The long-run impacts of same-race teachers. Institute of Labor Economics.

36.

Ghiso

M. P.

(2016). The laundromat as the transnational local: Young children’s literacies of interdependence. Teachers College Record, 118(1), 1–46.

37.

Göğebakan-Yıldız

Engin

(2019). Öğretmen adaylarına yönelik göç eğitim programı [Migration education program for teacher candidates]. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 180–214.

38.

Goodwin

A. L.

(2002). Teacher preparation and the education of immigrant children. Education and Urban Society, 34(2), 156–172.

39.

Goodwin

A. L.

(2017). Who is in the classroom now? Teacher preparation and the education of immigrant children. Educational Studies, 53(5), 433–449.

40.

Goodwin

A. L.

Chen

(2016). New knowledges for teacher educating? In Kosnik

White

Beck

Marshall

Goodwin

A. L.

Murray

(Eds.), Building bridges (pp. 149–162). Sense Publishers.

41.

Goodwin

A. L.

Smith

Souto-Manning

Cheruvu

Tan

M. Y.

Reed

Taveras

(2014). What should teacher educators know and be able to do? Perspectives from practicing teacher educators. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 284–302.

42.

M. M.

(2018). Teaching students from other cultures: An exploration of language teachers’ experiences with ethnic minority students. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 17(1), 1–15.

43.

M. M.

Kou

Z. C.

Guo

X. G.

(2019). Understanding Chinese language teachers’ language ideologies in teaching South Asian students in Hong Kong. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(8), 1030–1047.

44.

Haneda

Alexander

(2015). ESL teacher advocacy beyond the classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 49, 149–158.

45.

The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China. (2020, November 25). The Chief Executive’s 2020 policy address. https://www.policyaddress.gov.hk/2020/eng/policy.html

46.

Hopkins

Gluckman

Vahdani

(2019). Emergent change: A network analysis of elementary teachers’ learning about English learner instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 56(6), 2295–2332.

47.

Hopkins

Lowenhaupt

Sweet

T. M.

(2015). Organizing English learner instruction in new immigrant destinations: District infrastructure and subject-specific school practice. American Educational Research Journal, 52(3), 408–439.

48.

Howard

(2010). The value of ethnic diversity in the teaching profession: A New Zealand case study. International Journal of Education, 2(1), 1–22.

49.

Hue

M.-T.

Kennedy

K. J.

(2015). Promoting cultural responsiveness: Teachers’ constructs of an assessment classroom environment for ethnic minority students in Hong Kong. Teachers and Teaching, 21(3), 289–304.

50.

İçduygu

(2015). Syrian refugees in Turkey: The long road ahead. Migration Policy Institute.

51.

Martin

S. M.

(2015). Using cogenerative dialogues to improve coteaching for language learner (LL) students in an inclusion science classroom. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 355–369.

52.

Kasun

G. S.

(2016). Transnational Mexican-origin families’ ways of knowing: A framework toward bridging understandings in U.S. schools. Equity & Excellence in Education, 49(2), 129–142.

53.

Kaur

(2012). Equity and social justice in teaching and teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(4), 485–492.

54.

Kavanagh

S. S.

Danielson

K. A.

(2020). Practicing justice, justifying practice: Toward a critical practice teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 57(1), 69–105.

55.

Kennedy

M. M.

(2007). Defining a literature. Educational Researcher, 36(3), 139–147.

56.

Kuzu-Jafari

Tonğa

Kışla

(2018). Suriyeli öğrencilerin bulunduğu sınıflarda görev yapan sınıf öğretmenlerinin görüşleri ve uygulamalar [Practice and opinions of the teachers who work at the classes have Syrian students]. Academy Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(2), 134–146.

57.

Langenkamp

A. G.

(2019). Latino/a immigrant parents’ educational aspirations for their children. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 22(2), 231–249.

58.

Lee

C. C.

Akin

Goodwin

A. L.

(2019). Teacher candidates’ intentions to teach: Implications for recruiting and retaining teachers in urban schools. Journal of Education for Teaching, 45(5), 525–539.

59.

Loh

E. K. Y.

Tam

L. C. W.

(2016). Struggling to thrive: The impact of Chinese language assessments on social mobility of Hong Kong ethnic minority youth. Asia-Pacific Education Research, 25(5–6), 763–770.

60.

Madigan

(2015). “Can I ask a question?”: ESOL and mainstream teachers engaging in distributed and distributive learning to support English language learners’ text comprehension. Teacher Education Quarterly, 42(4), 33–58.

61.

Malsbary

C. B.

(2018). Teachers as creative designers in transnationalism. Urban Education, 53(10), 1238–1264.

62.

McDonald

M. A.

(2007). The joint enterprise of social justice teacher education. Teachers College Record, 109(8), 2047–2081.

63.

Mills

Ballantyne

(2016). Social justice and teacher education: A systematic review of empirical work in the field. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(4), 263–276.

64.

Moore

(2018). Learning to teach bilingual students: How teacher candidates appropriate linguistically responsive practices. Action in Teacher Education, 40(3), 336–353.

65.

Ngo

Dyke

LoBello

(2018). Connecting as “family” in educative relationships: Insights from a media program serving Hmong immigrant youth. Urban Education, 53(9), 1126–1153.

66.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). Educating teachers for diversity: Meeting the challenge. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1787/9789264079731-en

67.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015). Immigrant students at school: Easing the journey towards integration. OECD Publishing.

68.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). Supporting teacher professionalism: Insights from TALIS 2013. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1787/9789264248601-en

69.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019a). PISA 2018 results: Where all students can succeed (Vol. II). OECD Publishing.

70.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019b). TALIS 2018 results: Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners (Vol. I). OECD Publishing.

71.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019c). The road to integration: Education and migration. OECD Publishing.

72.

Oyler

(2011). Teacher preparation for inclusive and critical (special) education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 34(3), 201–218.

73.

Paine

Blòmeke

Aydarova

(2016). Teachers and teaching in the context of globalization. In Gitomer

Bell

(Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 717–786). American Educational Research Association.

74.

Patton

M. Q.

(1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE.

75.

Petticrew

Roberts

(2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Blackwell.

76.

Public Policy & Management Institute. (2017). Preparing teachers for diversity: The role of initial teacher education. European Commission.

77.

Pugach

M. C.

Gomez-Najarro

Matewos

A. M.

(2018). A review of identity in research on social justice in teacher education: What role for intersectionality? Journal of Teacher Education, 70(3), 206–218.

78.

Redding

(2019). A teacher like me: A review of the effect of student-teacher racial/ethnic matching on teacher perceptions of students and student academic and behavioral outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 89(4), 499–535.

79.

Rojas

Liou

(2018). Teaching for social justice: The promise of transformative expectations for urban Chicanx/Latinx youth. Equity & Excellence in Education, 51(2), 161–181.

80.

Russell

F. A.

(2015). Learning to teach English learners: Instructional coaching developing novice high school teacher capacity. Teacher Education Quarterly, 42(1), 27–47.

81.

Shum

M. S.-K.

Tai

C. P.

Shi

(2018). Using “reading to learn” (R2L) pedagogy to teach discussion genre to non-Chinese-speaking students in Hong Kong. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(2), 237–247.

82.

Sleeter

C. E.

(2017). Critical race theory and the whiteness of teacher education. Urban Education, 52(2), 155–169.

83.

Solak

Çelik

(2018). Türkiye’de eğitim gören mülteci öğrencilerin dilsel sorunlarının incelenmesi [Investigation of linguistic challenges faced by refugee students in Turkey]. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi [The Journal of International Social Research], 11(57), 425–432.

84.

Sosa-Provencio

M. A.

(2018). A revolucionista ethic of care: Four Mexicana educators’ subterraneous social justice revolution of fighting and feeding. American Educational Research Journal, 56(4), 1113–1147.

85.

Sugarman

(2017). Beyond teaching English: Supporting high school completion by immigrant and refugee students. Migration Policy Institute.

86.

Thapa

C. B.

Adamson

(2018). Ethnicity, language-in-education policy and linguistic discrimination: Perspectives of Nepali students in Hong Kong. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 39(4), 329–340.

87.

Tösten

Toprak

Kayan

M. S.

(2017). An investigation of forcibly migrated Syrian refugee students at Turkish public schools. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(7), 1149–1160.

88.

UN Refugee Agency. (2018). Syria emergency. https://www.unhcr.org/syria-emergency.html

89.

United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund. (2020). Child migration. https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-migration-and-displacement/migration

90.

White

Murray

Goodwin

A. L.

Kosnik

Beck

(2021). On the shoulder of giants: Advice for beginning teacher educators. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 49(5), 566–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2020.1756223

91.

Wong

Y. K.

(2019). Role of decoding competence in the Chinese reading comprehension development of ethnic minority students in Hong Kong. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(8), 1016–1029.

92.

Zarate

A. D.

Reese

Flores

Villegas

(2016). “Making Cambios, Usando la Voz”: Addressing ethical dilemmas of education in immigrant contexts. Issues in Teacher Education, 25(1), 39–57.

93.

Zayimoğlu-Öztürk

(2018). Mülteci öğrencilere sunulan eğitim-öğretim hizmetinin sosyal bilgiler öğretmen görüşlerine göre değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of educational service provided for refugee students according to social studies teachers’ opinions]. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 8(1), 52–79.

94.

Zoch

(2017). “It’s important for them to know who they are”: Teachers’ efforts to sustain students’ cultural competence in an age of high-stakes testing. Urban Education, 52(5), 610–636.