Desettling History: Non-Indigenous Teachers’ Practices and Tensions Engaging Indigenous Knowledges

Abstract

Background/Context:

For educators committed to unraveling racism and colonial bias in world history courses, challenges persist—particularly with Indigenous peoples and knowledges. Typical history curriculum, standards, and instructional tools misrepresent Indigenous peoples and knowledges in damaging and inaccurate ways. In cities, where Indigenous peoples and the natural world are often presumed distant, teachers may especially struggle to disrupt these patterns.

Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study:

This study explores the efforts of two experienced urban secondary teachers nominated by local Indigenous educators, asking: How do teachers craft globally-oriented history instruction that engages Indigenous knowledges in historical inquiry?

Population/Participants/Subjects:

Both participants were experienced social studies teachers in or near West Coast cities, in public schools with strong racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic diversity. Julie (a white woman in her late 50s) taught in a small alternative middle school, while Teacher X (a Xicano/Latino man in his early 40s) taught in a large comprehensive high school.

Research Design:

This qualitative comparative case study relied on teacher interviews, class observations, and document analysis. Student and colleague interviews supported triangulation.

Findings/Results:

Findings indicate three teaching practices for desettling expectations (Bang et al., 2012) in historical inquiry: (1) strengthening context for Indigenous knowledges and sovereignty to counter colonial patterns of erasure; (2) using historiographical counter-narratives to show how interpretations of history are situated in colonial power relations; and (3) offering experiential and place-based learning with Indigenous knowledges beyond the classroom. Although both teachers worked to desettle expectations in these ways, only one showed consistency with centering Indigenous knowledges in observed practice.

Conclusions/Recommendations:

Personal resonance with relational and place-based learning appears crucial for teaching Indigenous historical perspectives meaningfully, which may prove challenging for teachers who identify as “urban” in ways perceived as distant from the natural world. Combined with the three practices above, teachers’ ongoing, reciprocal relationships with Indigenous peoples and homelands shaped their effectiveness in engaging Indigenous knowledges as valid and generative for historical inquiry, offering implications for practitioners and scholars in global historical inquiry and teacher education.

Keywords

Indigenous knowledge history instruction world history urban education teacher education

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahenakew

(2016). Grafting Indigenous ways of knowing onto non-Indigenous ways of being: The (underestimated) challenges of a decolonial imagination. International Review of Qualitative Research, 9(3), 323–340.

Archibald

(2008). Indigenous storywork: Educating the heart, mind, body, and spirit. University of British Columbia Press.

Aronson

Laughter

(2016). The theory and practice of culturally relevant education: A synthesis of research across content areas. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 163–206.

Bain

R. B.

(2006). Rounding up unusual suspects: Facing the authority hidden in the history classroom. Teachers College Record, 108(10), 2080–2114.

Bain

R. B.

Mirel

(2006). Setting up camp at the great instructional divide: Educating beginning history teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 212–219.

Bang

(2015). Culture, learning, and development and the natural world: The influences of situative perspectives. Educational Psychologist, 50(3), 220–233.

Bang

Curley

Kessel

Marin

Suzokovich

(2014). Muskrat theories, tobacco in the streets, and living Chicago as Indigenous lands. Environmental Education Research, 20, 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.865113

Bang

Medin

(2010). Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies. Science Education, 94(6), 1008–1026.

Bang

Warren

Rosebery

A. S.

Medin

(2012). Desettling expectations in science education. Human Development, 55(5–6), 302–318.

10.

Barajas-López

Bang

(2018). Indigenous making and sharing: Claywork in an Indigenous STEAM program. Equity & Excellence in Education, 51(1), 7–20.

11.

Barton

K. C.

Avery

P. G.

(2016). Research on social studies education: Diverse students, settings, and methods. In Gitomer

D. H.

Bell

C. A.

(Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (5th ed., pp. 985–1038). American Educational Research Association.

12.

Battiste

Henderson

J. S. Y.

(2009). Naturalizing Indigenous knowledge in Eurocentric education. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 32(1), 5–18.

13.

Boal

(2002). Games for actors and non-actors. Routledge.

14.

Brayboy

B. M. J.

(2005). Toward a tribal critical race theory in education. The Urban Review, 37(5), 425–446.

15.

Cajete

(1994). Look to the mountain: An ecology of Indigenous education. Kivaki Press.

16.

Calderón

(2014). Uncovering settler grammars in curriculum. Educational Studies, 50(4), 313–338.

17.

Castagno

Brayboy

(2008). Culturally responsive schooling for Indigenous youth: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 941–993.

18.

Coffey

Atkinson

(1996). Making sense of qualitative data. SAGE.

19.

Coffin

S. H.

(2017). The spirits still among us: Native American poets and the voices of history in the present tense. Teachers Institute of Philadelphia Curriculum Units. https://theteachersinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Coffin-Sydney-unit.pdf

20.

Conrad

(2019). The Big History Project and colonizing knowledges in world history curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51(1), 1–20.

21.

Corntassel

(2012). Re-envisioning resurgence: Indigenous pathways to decolonization and sustainable self-determination. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1). https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/des/article/view/18627/15550

22.

Delgado

(1989). Storytelling for oppositionists and others: A plea for narrative. Michigan Law Review, 87(8), 2411–2441.

23.

Deloria

P. J.

(1998). Playing Indian. Yale University Press.

24.

Deloria

Wildcat

(2001). Power and place: Indian education in America. Fulcrum.

25.

Deng

(2015). Organizing and sequencing of subject matters. In He

M. F.

Schultz

B. D.

Schubert

W. H.

(Eds.), SAGE guide to curriculum in education (pp. 78–86). SAGE.

26.

Díaz

Rodgers

Byland

B. E.

David

(1993). The Codex Borgia: A full-color restoration of the ancient Mexican manuscript. Dover.

27.

Dion

S. D.

(2009). Braiding histories: Learning from Aboriginal peoples’ experiences and perspectives. University of British Columbia Press.

28.

Donald

(2009). The curricular problem of Indigenousness: Colonial frontier logics, teacher resistances, and the acknowledgment of ethical space. In Nahachewsky

Johnston

(Eds.), Beyond presentism: Re-imagining the historical, personal, and social places of curriculum (pp. 23–41). Sense.

29.

Dozono

(2017). Teaching alternative and indigenous gender systems in world history: A queer approach. The History Teacher, 50(3), 425–447.

30.

Dozono

(2020). The passive voice of White supremacy: Tracing epistemic and discursive violence in world history curriculum. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 42(1), 1–26.

31.

Emerson

R. M.

Fretz

R. I.

Shaw

L. L.

(2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press.

32.

Epstein

(2010). Interpreting national history: Race, identity, and pedagogy in classrooms and communities. Routledge.

33.

Fine

(2000). Working the hyphens. In Denzin

N. K.

Lincoln

Y. S.

(Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 70–82). SAGE.

34.

Fogo

(2014). Core practices for teaching history: The results of a Delphi panel survey. Theory & Research in Social Education, 42(2), 151–196.

35.

Girard

Harris

L. M.

(2018). Global and world history education. In Metzger

Harris

L. M.

(Eds.), The Wiley international handbook of history teaching and learning (pp. 253–280). Wiley Blackwell.

36.

Hakim

(2007). A history of US: From colonies to country. Oxford University Press.

37.

Harris

C. I.

(1993). Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review, 106(8), 1707–1791.

38.

Haynes Writer

. (2002). “No matter how bitter, horrible, or controversial”: Exploring the value of a Native American education course in a teacher education program. Action in Teacher Education, 24(2), 9–21.

39.

Hobot

(2017). Resurgence: Restructuring urban American Indian education (National Urban Indian Family Coalition: Executive Summary). Schott Foundation for Public Education. http://schottfoundation.org/report/resurgence-restructuring-urban-american-indian-education

40.

Holmes

González

(2017). Finding sustenance: An Indigenous relational pedagogy. In Paris

Alim

H. S.

(Eds.), Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world (pp. 207–224). Teachers College Press.

41.

Jacob

M. C.

(1992). Science and politics in the late twentieth century. Social Research, 59(3), 487–503.

42.

Jacob

M. M.

Sabzalian

Jansen

Tobin

T. J.

Vincent

C. G.

LaChance

K. M.

(2018). The gift of education: How Indigenous knowledges can transform the future of public education. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 20(1), 157–185.

43.

Kerr

(2014). Western epistemic dominance and colonial structures: Considerations for thought and practice in programs of teacher education. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 3(2), 83–104.

44.

Kincheloe

J. L.

Steinberg

S. R.

(2008). Indigenous knowledges in education: Complexities, dangers, and profound benefits. In Denzin

N. K.

Lincoln

Y. S.

Smith

L. T.

(Eds.), Handbook of critical and Indigenous methodologies (pp. 135–156). SAGE.

45.

Kovach

(2018). Doing Indigenous methodologies: A letter to a research class. In Denzin

Lincoln

Y. S.

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 213–234). SAGE.

46.

Kulago

H. A.

(2019). In the business of futurity: Indigenous teacher education & settler colonialism. Equity & Excellence in Education, 52(2–3), 239–254.

47.

Ladson-Billings

(1998). Just what is critical race theory and what’s it doing in a nice field like education? International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(1), 7–24.

48.

Lee

C. D.

(2001). Is October Brown Chinese? A cultural modeling activity system for underachieving students. American Educational Research Journal, 38(1), 97–141.

49.

Lévesque

Clark

(2018). Historical thinking: Definitions and educational applications. In Metzger

S. A.

Harris

L. M.

(Eds.), The Wiley international handbook of history teaching and learning (pp. 119–148). Wiley.

50.

Levstik

L. S.

Barton

K. C.

(2015). Why don’t more history teachers engage students in interpretation? In Parker

W. C.

(Ed.), Social studies today (pp. 45–52). Routledge.

51.

Lomawaima

McCarty

(2002). When tribal sovereignty challenges democracy: American Indian education and the democratic ideal. American Educational Research Journal, 39(2), 279–305.

52.

Marino

M. P.

(2011). High school world history textbooks: An analysis of content focus and chronological approaches. The History Teacher, 44(3), 421–446.

53.

Marino

M. P.

Bolgatz

(2010). Weaving a fabric of world history? An analysis of U.S. state high school world history standards. Theory & Research in Social Education, 38(3), 366–394.

54.

Marker

(2011). Teaching history from an Indigenous perspective: Four winding paths up the mountain. In Clark

(Ed.), New possibilities for the past: Shaping history education in Canada (pp. 97–112). University of British Columbia Press.

55.

McGregor

H. E.

(2014). Exploring ethnohistory and Indigenous scholarship: What is the relevance to educational historians? History of Education, 43(4), 431–449.

56.

Medina

(2013). The epistemology of resistance: Gender and racial oppression, epistemic injustice, and the social imagination. Oxford University Press.

57.

Merriam

S. B.

Tisdell

E. J.

(2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

58.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

A. M.

Saldaña

(2014). Tactics for testing or confirming findings. In Miles

M. B.

Huberman

A. M.

Saldaña

(Eds.), Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed., pp. 293–310). SAGE.

59.

Million

(2009). Felt theory: An Indigenous feminist approach to affect and history. Wíčazo Ša Review, 24(2), 53–76.

60.

Nasir

N. I. S.

(2002). Identity, goals, and learning: Mathematics in cultural practice. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2–3), 213–247.

61.

Nasir

N. I. S.

Hand

V. M.

(2006). Exploring sociocultural perspectives on race, culture, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 449–475.

62.

Paris

(2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97.

63.

Patel

(2015). Decolonizing educational research: From ownership to answerability. Routledge.

64.

Patton

(2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. SAGE.

65.

Richter

D. K.

(2009). Facing east from Indian country: A native history of early America. Harvard University Press.

66.

Rifkin

(2017). Beyond settler time: Temporal sovereignty and Indigenous self-determination. Duke University Press.

67.

Rosebery

A. S.

Ogonowski

DiSchino

Warren

(2010). “The coat traps all your body heat”: Heterogeneity as fundamental to learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(3), 322–357.

68.

Ryan

G. W.

Bernard

H. R.

(2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15(1), 85–109.

69.

Sabzalian

(2019). Indigenous children’s survivance in public schools. Routledge.

70.

Said

(1978). Orientalism: Western representations of the orient. Pantheon.

71.

Salinas

Blevins

Sullivan

C. C.

(2012). Critical historical thinking: When official narratives collide with other narratives. Multicultural Perspectives, 14(1), 18–27.

72.

Santiago

(2019). Historical inquiry to challenge the narrative of racial progress. Cognition and Instruction, 37(1), 93–117.

73.

Scott

Gani

(2018). Examining social studies teachers’ resistances towards teaching aboriginal perspectives: The case of Alberta. Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education, 12(4), 167–181.

74.

Shear

S. B.

Knowles

R. T.

Soden

G. J.

Castro

A. J.

(2015). Manifesting destiny: Re/presentations of Indigenous peoples in K–12 U.S. history standards. Theory & Research in Social Education, 43(1), 68–101.

75.

Shear

S. B.

Krutka

D. G.

(2019). Confronting settler colonialism: Theoretical and methodological questions about social studies research. Theory & Research in Social Education, 47, 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2018.1541428

76.

Shirley

V. J.

(2017). Indigenous social justice pedagogy: Teaching into the risks and cultivating the heart. Critical Questions in Education, 8(2), 163–177.

77.

Simpson

L. R.

(2014). Land as pedagogy: Nishnaabeg intelligence and rebellious transformation. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 3(3), 119–148.

78.

Smith

L. T.

(2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). Zed.

79.

Smith

L. T.

Tuck

Yang

K. W.

(2018). Introduction. In Smith

L. T.

Tuck

Yang

K. W.

(Eds.), Indigenous and decolonizing studies in education: Mapping the long view. Routledge.

80.

Smith

(1997). The Norton history of the human sciences. W. W. Norton & Company.

81.

Smithsonian. (2019). Native knowledge 360 education initiative. National Museum of the American Indian. https://americanindian.si.edu/nk360

82.

Stake

R. E.

(2008). Qualitative case studies. In Denzin

N. K.

Lincoln

Y. S.

(Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 119–149). SAGE.

83.

Stanton

C. R.

(2012). Hearing the story: Critical Indigenous curriculum inquiry and primary source representation in social studies education. Theory & Research in Social Education, 40(4), 339–370.

84.

Stanton

C. R.

(2014). The curricular Indian agent: Discursive colonization and Indigenous (dys)agency in U.S. history textbooks. Curriculum Inquiry, 44(5), 649–676.

85.

Stanton

C. R.

Morrison

(2018). Investigating curricular policy as a tool to dismantle the master’s house: Indian Education for All and social studies teacher education. Policy Futures in Education, 16(6), 729–748.

86.

Symonette

(2008). Cultivating self as responsive instrument. In Denzin

N. K.

Lincoln

Y. S.

(Eds.), Handbook of social research ethics (pp. 279–294). SAGE.

87.

Tuck

(2009). Suspending damage: A letter to communities. Harvard Educational Review, 79(3), 409–428.

88.

Tuck

Gaztambide-Fernández

R. A.

(2013). Curriculum, replacement, and settler futurity. Journal of Curriculum Theory, 29(1), 72–89.

89.

Valdez

(1973). Pensamiento Serpentino: A Chicano approach to the theater of reality. Cucaracha.

90.

van Boxtel

van Drie

. (2018). Historical reasoning: Conceptualizations and educational applications. In Metzger

S. A.

Harris

L. M.

(Eds.), The Wiley international handbook of history teaching and learning (pp. 149–176). Wiley.

91.

VanSledright

B. A.

(2004). What does it mean to think historically . . . and how do you teach it? Social Education, 68(3), 230–234.

92.

Veracini

(2011). On settlerness. Borderlands, 10(1), 1–17.

93.

Vizenor

(1994). Manifest manners: Post-Indian warriors of survivance. University Press of New England.

94.

Warren

Vossoughi

Rosebery

A. S.

Bang

Taylor

E. V.

(2020). Multiple ways of knowing: Re-imagining disciplinary learning. In Nasir

N. S.

Lee

C. D.

Pea

de Royston

M. M.

(Eds.), Handbook of the cultural foundations of learning (pp. 277–294). Routledge.

95.

Welsh

R. O.

Swain

W. A.

(2020). (Re)Defining urban education: A conceptual review and empirical exploration of the definition of urban education. Educational Researcher, 49(2), 90–100.

96.

White

D. G.

Deverell

(2014). United States history: Beginnings to 1877. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

97.

Willinsky

(1998). Learning to divide the world: Education at empire’s end. University of Minnesota Press.

98.

Wilson

S. M.

(2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Fernwood.

99.

Wilson

S. M.

Wineburg

S. S.

(1988). Peering at history through different lenses: The role of disciplinary perspectives in teaching history. Teachers College Record, 89(4), 525–539.

100.

Wineburg

(2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past. Temple University Press.

101.

Wolfe

(2006). Settler colonialism and the elimination of the native. Journal of Genocide Research, 8(4), 387–409.