Solidarity Incarcerated: Building Authentic Relationships With Girls of Color in Youth Prisons

Abstract

Context:

Prison education has often been ignored in discussions of public education. When it has been included, Girls of Color are often eclipsed by larger populations of Boys of Color. Yet the routes disabled Girls of Color take to prisons are different from those of their male peers; Girls of Color become incarcerated for low-level offenses and often end up back in prison due to probation violations, meaning they have been punished more severely for original crimes. Although prison education has offered educational opportunities, such as the chance to get a diploma or GED, most of it has been found to be remedial and irrelevant to the lives of incarcerated disabled Girls of Color.

Focus of Study:

In this article, we unraveled the complexities and nuances of solidarity within prison education classrooms with disabled Girls of Color. Using a disability critical race theory (DisCrit) Solidarity lens while analyzing a sociocritical literacy course, the empirical research question was: What are the affordances and constraints of DisCrit Solidarity with disabled Girls of Color in a youth prison?

Research Design:

Our qualitative study took place in a maximum-security youth prison in the Midwestern part of the United States. This study was part of a larger one-year project that included 16 incarcerated disabled girls, mostly Girls of Color, who enrolled in a credit-bearing sociocritical literacy course designed and taught by the principal investigator and teaching team. Our full corpus of data included interviews with the girls (23) and adults in the youth prison (6), classroom observations (25), education journey maps (10), focus groups (4), fieldnotes (20), and classroom artifacts (21). Data for this study focused on the interviews with the girls, observations, fieldnotes, and class materials.

Conclusions/Recommendations:

Our analysis illustrated the affordances and constraints of solidarity in prison classrooms with incarcerated disabled Girls of Color. The affordances included tangible moves that the girls identified as solidarity, the need for solidarity to make critical pedagogy and curriculum impactful, and the effect of those affordances that the girls described. In youth prisons where tools of learning, such as pencils, were considered weapons, we found two constraints that limited DisCrit Solidarity efforts: the conflation of support with solidarity and the violent context of youth prisons. We conclude with the implication that our solidarity efforts were incarcerated. To move beyond narrowly focused solidarity efforts, we suggest growing out abolitionist geography to consider the multiscalar processes that lead to sustained solidarities with incarcerated disabled Girls of Color.

Acknowledgements:

We would like to thank Marilyn Ortega and William Proffitt for their roles in both the pedagogical team and data collection on this project. We also appreciate the editors of this special issue, David Connor and Beth Ferri, for their vision and inclusion of our work and the reviewers whose feedback strengthened our work substantially. Finally, the principal investigator would like to thank the Ford Foundation and the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, which made this research possible through the Ford Postdoctoral Fellowship.

Keywords

DisCrit incarcerated youth solidarity Disability Studies and Critical Race Theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen-DeBoer

R. A.

Malmgren

K. W.

Glass

M. E.

(2006). Reading instruction for youth with emotional and behavioral disorders in a juvenile correctional facility. Behavioral Disorders, 32(1), 18–28.

American Civil Liberties Union. (2021). America’s addiction to juvenile incarceration: State by state. https://www.aclu.org/issues/juvenile-justice/youth-incarceration/americas-addiction-juvenile-incarceration-state-state

Annamma

S. A.

(2017). Mapping consequential geographies in the carceral state: Education journey mapping as a qualitative method with girls of color with dis/abilities. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(1), 20–34.

Annamma

S. A.

(2018). The pedagogy of pathologization: Dis/abled girls of color in the school-prison nexus. Routledge.

Annamma

S. A.

Connor

Ferri

(2013). Dis/ability critical race studies (DisCrit): Theorizing at the intersections of race and dis/ability. Race Ethnicity and Education, 16(1), 1-31.

Annamma

S. A.

Handy

(2019). DisCrit solidarity as curriculum studies and transformative praxis. Curriculum Inquiry, 49(4), 442-463.

Annamma

Handy

Miller

A. L.

Jackson

(2020). Animating discipline disparities through debilitating practices: Girls of Color and inequitable classroom interactions. Teachers College Record, 122(5), 1–30.

Annamma

Morrison

(2018). DisCrit classroom ecology: Using praxis to dismantle dysfunctional education ecologies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 70–80.

Artiles

A. J.

(2013). Untangling the racialization of disabilities: An intersectionality critique across disability models. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 10(2), 329–347.

10.

Barnert

E. S.

Dudovitz

Nelson

B. B.

Coker

T. R.

Biely

Chung

P. J.

(2017). How does incarcerating young people affect their adult health outcomes? Pediatrics, 139(2), 1–11.

11.

Ben-Moshe

(2020). Decarcerating disability: Deinstitutionalization and prison abolition. University of Minnesota Press.

12.

Bhattacharya

(2017). Fundamentals of qualitative research: A practical guide. Taylor & Francis.

13.

Brantlinger

Jimenez

Klingner

Pugach

Richardson

(2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195–207.

14.

Castro

E. L.

Brawn

(2017). Critiquing critical pedagogies inside the prison classroom: A dialogue between student and teacher. Harvard Educational Review, 87(1), 99–121.

15.

Catanzaro

(1988). Using qualitative analytical techniques. In Woods

N. F.

Catanzaro

(Eds.), Nursing research: Theory and practice (pp. 437–456). C. V. Mosby.

16.

Center for American Progress, Movement Advancement Project, and Youth First. (2017). Unjust: LGBTQ youth incarcerated in the juvenile justice system. https://lgbtmap.org/file/lgbtq-incarcerated-youth.pdf

17.

Charmaz

(2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.

18.

Children’s Defense Fund. (2020). The state of America’s children 2020. https://www.childrensdefense.org/the-state-of-americas-children-2020/

19.

Corbin

J. M.

Strauss

(1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21.

20.

Davis

A. Y.

(2003). Are prisons obsolete? Seven Stories Press.

21.

Drakeford

(2002). The impact of an intensive program to increase the literacy skills of youth confined to juvenile corrections. Journal of Correctional Education, 53(4), 139–144.

22.

Du Bois

W. E. B.

(1935). Black reconstruction in America: Toward a history of the part which black folk played in the attempt to reconstruct democracy in America, 1860–1880. Routledge.

23.

Dumas

M. J.

(2014). ‘Losing an arm’: Schooling as a site of black suffering. Race Ethnicity and Education, 17(1), 1–29.

24.

Duncan-Andrade

(2009). Note to educators: Hope required when growing roses in concrete. Harvard Educational Review, 79(2), 181–194.

25.

Ellsworth

(1989). Why doesn’t this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 59(3), 297–325.

26.

Elo

Kyngäs

(2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.

27.

Erickson

(2004). Demystifying data construction and analysis. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 35(4), 486–493.

28.

Erickson

Schaefer

(2020). Long term effects of juvenile correctional confinement. In Palermo

Bartoli

Dumache

(Eds.), Criminology and post-mortem studies—Analyzing criminal behaviour and making medical decisions. Bod Third Party.

29.

Ewing

E. L.

(2018). Ghosts in the schoolyard: Racism and school closings on Chicago’s South Side. University of Chicago Press.

30.

Ferguson

A. A.

(2000). Bad boys: Public schools in the making of black masculinity. University of Michigan Press.

31.

Freire

(1970/2010). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed.). Continuum.

32.

Freire

Ara

A. M.

(1998). Pedagogy of the heart. Bloomsbury.

33.

Gay

(2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, practice and research. Teachers College Press.

34.

Gilmore

R. W.

(2007). Golden gulag: Prisons, surplus, crisis, and opposition in globalizing California (Vol. 21). University of California Press.

35.

Gilmore

R. W.

(2018). Abolition geography and the problem of innocence. Tabula Rasa, (28), 57–77.

36.

Givens

J. R.

(2021). Fugitive pedagogy: Carter G. Woodson and the art of Black teaching. Harvard University Press.

37.

Gutiérrez

K. D.

(2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148–164.

38.

Harris

C. I.

(1993). Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review, 106(8), 1707–1791.

39.

Hayes

(2020). For water, love, and liberation: We learned together. In Shield

A. E.

Paris

San Pedro

(Eds.), Education in movement spaces: Standing Rock to Chicago Freedom Square. Routledge.

40.

Hockenberry

Sladky

(2018). Juvenile residential facility census, 2016: Selected findings. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. https://ojjdp.ojp.gov/sites/g/files/xyckuh176/files/pubs/251785.pdf

41.

hooks

(2003). Teaching community: A pedagogy of hope (Vol. 36). Routledge.

42.

Houchins

D. E.

Jolivette

Krezmien

M. P.

Baltodano

H. M.

(2008). A multi-state study examining the impact of explicit reading instruction with incarcerated students. Journal of Correctional Education, 59(1), 65–85.

43.

Kaba

(2021). We do this ‘til we free us: Abolitionist organizing and transforming justice. Haymarket Books.

44.

Katsarou

Picower

Stovall

(2010). Acts of solidarity: Developing urban social justice educators in the struggle for quality public education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 37(3), 137–153.

45.

Kilgore

(2011). Bringing Freire behind the walls: The perils and pluses of critical pedagogy in prison education. The Radical Teacher, (90), 57–66.

46.

Ladson-Billings

(1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491.

47.

Ladson-Billings

(2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in US schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3–12.

48.

Laura

C. T.

(2014). Being bad: My baby brother and the school-to-prison pipeline. Teachers College Press.

49.

Leone

P. E.

Krezmien

Mason

Meisel

S. M.

(2005). Organizing and delivering empirically based literacy instruction to incarcerated youth. Exceptionality, 13(2), 89–102.

50.

Lincoln

Y. S.

Guba

E. G.

(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

51.

Lipscomb

(2012). Abductive reasoning and qualitative research. Nursing Philosophy, 13(4), 244–256.

52.

Liu

Shange

(2018). Toward thick solidarity: Theorizing empathy in social justice movements. Radical History Review, 2018(131), 189–198.

53.

Love

B. L.

(2019). We want to do more than survive: Abolitionist teaching and the pursuit of educational freedom. Beacon Press.

54.

Maher

Hadfield

Hutchings

de Eyto

(2018). Ensuring rigor in qualitative data analysis: A design research approach to coding combining NVivo with traditional material methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1), 1–13.

55.

Malmgren

K. W.

Leone

P. E.

(2000). Effects of a short-term auxiliary reading program on the reading skills of incarcerated youth. Education and Treatment of Children, 23(3), 239–247.

56.

Martinez

D. C.

(2017). Imagining a language of solidarity for Black and Latinx youth in English language arts classrooms. English Education, 49(2), 179–196.

57.

Martinez

D. C.

Baker-Bell

Eagle Shield

Lee

C. H.

(2021). In dialogue: Solidarity. National Council of Teachers of English, 55(4), 442–453.

58.

Meiners

E. R.

(2007). Right to be hostile: Schools, prisons, and the making of public enemies. Routledge.

59.

Mendel

R. A.

(2011). No place for kids: The case for reducing juvenile incarceration. Annie E. Casey Foundation. http://www.njjn.org/uploads/digital-library/AECF_JJ_NoPlaceForKids_Full_Oct2011.pdf

60.

Merleau-Ponty

Smith

(1962). Phenomenology of perception (Vol. 2012). Routledge.

61.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

A. M.

(1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.

62.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

A. M.

Saldaña

(2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.

63.

Mingus

(2013, November 20). Beyond access: Mia Mingus on disability justice [Interview transcript]. https://equitableeducation.ca/2013/mia-mingus-disability-justice

64.

Morrell

(2014). Toward a critical model of teacher learning: Lessons from the South Carolina Reading Initiative. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 30(3), 207–210.

65.

Paris

(2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97.

66.

Patel

(2016). Pedagogies of resistance and survivance: Learning as marronage. Equity & Excellence in Education, 49(4), 397–401.

67.

Philip

T. M.

Martinez

D. C.

Lopez

Garcia

(2016). Toward a teacher solidarity lens: Former teachers of color (re) envisioning educational research. Race Ethnicity and Education, 19(1), 182–199.

68.

Ravitch

S. M.

Riggan

(2016). Reason & rigor: How conceptual frameworks guide research. Sage.

69.

Ritchie

A. J.

(2017). Invisible no more: Police violence against Black women and women of color. Beacon Press.

70.

Richie

B. E.

(2012). Arrested justice: Black women, violence, and America’s prison nation. New York University Press.

71.

Rodwell

M. K.

(1998). Social work constructivist research. Garland.

72.

Rovner

(2021). Racial disparities in youth incarceration persist. The Sentencing Project. https://www.sentencingproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Racial-Disparities-in-Youth-Incarceration-Persist.pdf

73.

Saldaña

(2013). The coding manual of qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Sage.

74.

Sawyer

(2019). Youth confinement: The whole pie 2019. Prison Policy Initiative. https://www.prisonpolicy.org/reports/youth2019.html

75.

Scahill

(2021, March 17). Hope is a discipline: Mariame Kaba on dismantling the carceral state. The Intercept. https://theintercept.com/2021/03/17/intercepted-mariame-kaba-abolitionist-organizing/

76.

Schweik

(2013). Lomax’s matrix: Disability, solidarity, and the Black power of 504. In Wappett

Arndt

(Eds.), Foundations of disability studies (pp. 105–123). Palgrave Macmillan.

77.

Seidman

(2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers College Press.

78.

Sentencing Project. (2020). Incarcerated women and girls. https://www.sentencingproject.org/publications/incarcerated-women-and-girls/

79.

Shank

(2008). Abductive strategies in educational research. American Journal of Semiotics, 5(2), 275–290.

80.

Shedd

(2015). Unequal city: Race, schools, and perceptions of injustice. Russell Sage Foundation.

81.

Shield

A. E.

Paris

San Pedro

(Eds.). (2020). Education in movement spaces: Standing Rock to Chicago Freedom Square. Routledge.

82.

Sickmund

Sladky

T. J.

Kang

Puzzanchera

(2019). Easy access to the census of juveniles in residential placement [Data set]. https://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezacjrp/

83.

Sojoyner

D. M.

(2016). First strike: Educational enclosures in Black Los Angeles. University of Minnesota Press.

84.

Spade

(2011). Normal life: Administrative violence, critical trans politics, and the limits of law. Duke University Press.

85.

Stovall

(2018). Are we ready for ‘school’ abolition?: Thoughts and practices of radical imaginary in education. Taboo: The Journal of Culture and Education, 17(1), 6.

86.

Stovall

D. O.

(2016). Born out of struggle: Critical race theory, school creation, and the politics of interruption. SUNY Press.

87.

Thomas

D. R.

(2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246.

88.

Timmermans

Tavory

(2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167–186.

89.

U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. (2019). Beyond suspensions: Examining school discipline policies and connections to the school-to-prison-pipeline for students of color with disabilities. https://www.usccr.gov/pubs/2019/07-23-Beyond-Suspensions.pdf

90.

Musgrove

Yudin

M. K.

(2013). Letter to the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. U.S. Department of Education. https://sites.ed.gov/idea/files/idea-letter.pdf

91.

Valenzuela

(1999). Subtractive schooling: Issues of caring in education of US-Mexican youth. State University of New York Press.

92.

Vaught

S. E.

(2017). Compulsory: Education and the dispossession of youth in a prison school. University of Minnesota Press.

93.

Vélez

Solórzano

D. G.

(2017). Critical race spatial analysis: Conceptualizing GIS as a tool for critical race research in education. In Morrison

Annamma

S. A.

Jackson

D. D.

(Eds.), Critical race spatial analysis: Mapping to understand and address educational inequity (pp. 8–31). Stylus

94.

Waitoller

F. R.

(2020). Excluded by choice: Urban students with disabilities in the education marketplace. Teachers College Press.

95.

Willen

S. S.

(2007). Toward a critical phenomenology of “illegality”: State power, criminalization, and abjectivity among undocumented migrant workers in Tel Aviv, Israel. International Migration, 45(3), 8–38.

96.

Willingham

(2019). Prison is a place to teach us the things we’ve never learned in life. In Middlemass

K. M.

Smiley

(Eds.), Prisoner reentry in the 21st century: Critical perspectives of returning home (pp. 203–214). Routledge.

97.

Winn

M. T.

(2011). Girl time: Literacy, justice, and the school-to-prison pipeline. Teachers College Press.

98.

Winn

M. T.

(2018). Justice on both sides: Transforming education through restorative justice. Harvard Education Press.

99.

Young

M. V.

Phillips

R. S.

Nasir

N. I. S.

(2010). Schooling in a youth prison. Journal of Correctional Education, 61(3), 203–222.