Exploring the Conditional Indirect Associations of Reading Confidence with Achievement: Evidence from PIRLS 2021 Türkiye by Frequency of Speaking Turkish at Home

Abstract

Context:

Early reading achievement is shaped by students’ skills and by the motivational, socioeconomic, and institutional conditions in which literacy learning occurs. In Türkiye, this issue is salient because schooling is constitutionally monolingual, although many fourth-grade students report speaking a language other than Turkish at home. This home–school language mismatch raises questions about how reading confidence, socioeconomic status, and school academic climate are associated with achievement across levels of exposure to Turkish.

Purpose:

This study examines how students’ confidence in reading, school emphasis on academic success, and socioeconomic status are associated with fourth-grade reading achievement in Türkiye. It also investigates whether the estimated indirect association between reading confidence and achievement through school emphasis on academic success varies by socioeconomic status. Analyses are conducted separately across four groups defined by students’ frequency of speaking Turkish at home: always, almost always, sometimes, and never.

Research Design:

The study uses cross-sectional data from the PIRLS 2021 Türkiye national sample. After screening, the analytic sample included 5,421 fourth-grade students: 3,836 who always spoke Turkish at home, 698 who almost always did so, 743 who sometimes did so, and 144 who never did so. Reading achievement was analyzed using five PIRLS plausible values; the focal predictors were reading confidence, school emphasis on academic success, and home socioeconomic status. Hayes’s PROCESS Model 59 was estimated within each home-language subgroup, with coefficients combined across plausible values and interpreted as conditional associations.

Conclusions:

Reading confidence was positively associated with achievement across all four home-language groups, with the largest coefficient among students who never spoke Turkish at home. School emphasis on academic success also showed positive direct associations with achievement, suggesting that academic climate is especially relevant in linguistically constrained contexts. The estimated indirect pathway through school emphasis on academic success was detectable in the “sometimes” subgroup, while a comparable but less precise estimate appeared in the “never” subgroup. Socioeconomic status remained strongly associated with achievement, especially among students with less frequent exposure to Turkish at home. The findings support combining reading-confidence supports, academically focused school climates, and language-responsive policies for students navigating home–school language mismatch.

Keywords

Reading confidence reading achievement school emphasis on academic success socioeconomic status home language use educational equity PIRLS 2021 Türkiye

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abid

Aslam

Alghamdi

A. A.

Kumar

(2023). Relationships among students’ reading habits, study skills, and academic achievement in English at the secondary level. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1020269. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1020269

Adesope

O. O.

Lavin

Thompson

Ungerleider

(2010). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the cognitive correlates of bilingualism. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 207–245. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310368803

Albayrakoğlu

Yıldırım

(2022). School characteristics mediating the relationship between school socioeconomic status and mathematics achievement. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 9(1), 98–117. https://izlik.org/JA75ZM57HB

Almaskut

LaRoche

Foy

(2023). Chapter 8: Sample implementation in PIRLS 2021. In von Davier

Mullis

I. V. S.

Fishbein

Foy

(Eds.), Methods and procedures: PIRLS 2021 technical report (pp. 8.1–8.154). Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. https://doi.org/10.6017/lse.tpisc.tr2103.kb2743

Al-Obaydi

L. H.

Rahul

D. R.

Pikhart

(2024). The effect of online oral reading on reading comprehension, reading anxiety, and classroom anxiety among EFL learners. Education and Information Technologies, 29(3), 2841–2855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11950-y

Aydın

(2020, Dec. 20). Status of education and minorities rights in Turkey. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs. https://gjia.georgetown.edu/2020/12/20/status-of-education-and-minorities-rights-in-turkey/

Bandura

(1997). Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge University Press.

Bellocchi

Bonifacci

(2024). Disentangling the impact of bilingualism and SES in literacy skills of language-minority bilingual children and monolingual peers exposed to French. Reading Psychology, 45(3), 219–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2023.2276460

Bozkuş

(2025). Predictors of reading performance of fourth-grade Turkish students. Turkish Journal of Education, 14(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.1431545

10.

Bronfenbrenner

(2005). Ecological systems theory (1992). In Bronfenbrenner

(Ed.), Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development (pp. 106–173). Sage.

11.

Bruggink

Swart

van der Lee

Segers

(2022). Reading comprehension and multilingual students. In Putting PIRLS to use in classrooms across the globe (pp. 79–88, Vol. 1). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95266-2_4

12.

Cervetti

G. N.

Hinchman

K. A.

(2024). Are the nation’s fourth graders failing at reading? Teachers College Record, 126(8), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681241277291

13.

Chen

Sakyi

Cui

(2021). Linking student, home, and school factors to reading achievement: The mediating role of reading self-efficacy. Educational Psychology, 41(10), 1260–1279. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2021.1953445

14.

Coşkun

Derince

M. Ş.

Uçarlar

(2010). Dil yarası: Türkiye’de eğitimde anadilinin kullanılmaması sorunu ve Kürt öğrencilerin deneyimleri [The language wound: The problem of not using the mother tongue in education in Turkey and the experiences of Kurdish students]. DİSA Publications.

15.

Costa

Moreira

Casanova

Azevedo

Â.

Gonçalves

Oliveira

Í.

Azevedo

Dias

P. C.

(2024). Determinants of academic achievement from middle to secondary school education: A systematic review. Social Psychology of Education, 27, 3533–3572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09941-z

16.

Cummins

(2021). Rethinking the education of multilingual learners: A critical analysis of theoretical concepts. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781800413597

17.

Demir

M. C.

Atalay-Kabasakal

Şahin

M. D.

(2024). Investigation of the relationship between socioeconomic status and literacy in PISA Türkiye data. Turkish Journal of Education, 13(4), 360–378. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.1474213

18.

Derince

M. Ş

. (2012). Anadili temelli çokdilli ve çokdiyalektli dinamik eğitim: Kürt öğrencilerin eğitiminde kullanılabilecek modeller [Mother-tongue-based multilingual and multidialectal dynamic education: Models applicable for the education of Kurdish students]. DİSA Publications.

19.

Ethnologue. (2023). Languages of Türkiye. SIL Global. https://www.ethnologue.com/country/TR/

20.

Field

(2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS: Book plus code for E version of text. Sage.

21.

Gallagher

M. A.

Beck

J. S.

Ramirez

E. M.

Barber

A. T.

Buehl

M. M.

(2023). Supporting multilingual learners’ reading competence: A multiple case study of teachers’ instruction and student learning and motivation. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1085909. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1085909

22.

Harbatkin

Burns

Cullum

(2024). The role of school climate in school turnaround. Teachers College Record, 126(11–12), 126–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681251318876

23.

Hayes

A. F.

(2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.

24.

Hayes

A. F.

Rockwood

N. J.

(2017). Regression-based statistical mediation and moderation analysis in clinical research: Observations, recommendations, and implementation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 98, 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.11.001

25.

Hemmerechts

Agirdag

Kavadias

(2017). The relationship between parental literacy involvement, socio-economic status and reading literacy. Educational Review, 69(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2016.1164667

26.

Honicke

Broadbent

Fuller-Tyszkiewicz

(2023). The self-efficacy and academic performance reciprocal relationship: The influence of task difficulty and baseline achievement on learner trajectory. Higher Education Research & Development, 42(8), 1936–1953. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2197194

27.

Hooper

Mullis

I. V. S.

Martin

M. O.

Fishbein

(2017). TIMSS 2019 context questionnaire framework. In Mullis

I. V. S.

Martin

M. O.

(Eds.), TIMSS 2019 assessment frameworks (pp. 57–78). TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College; International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).

28.

International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. (2023). PIRLS 2021 international database. https://pirls2021.org/data/

29.

Kaya

İ.

Aydın

(2013). Türkiye'de anadilde eğitim sorunu: Zorluklar, deneyimler ve iki dilli eğitim modeli önerileri [The problem of mother tongue education in Turkey: Challenges, experiences and bilingual education model suggestions]. UKAM Publications.

30.

Kılıç Depren

Depren

Ö.

(2021). Cross-cultural comparisons of the factors influencing the high reading achievement in Turkey and China: Evidence from PISA 2018. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 31(4), 427–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00584-8

31.

Kilpi-Jakonen

Alisaari

(2022). Language choices at home and their relationship with educational outcomes, with a special focus on children with origins in former Yugoslavia and Turkey in six European countries. Frontiers in Sociology, 7, Article 841847. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2022.841847

32.

Kızıltaş

Kultaş

(2025). Why disadvantaged primary school students in rural areas have lower reading skills? A critical assessment. Reading Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2025.2551555

33.

KONDA Research and Consultancy. (2021). Türkiye 100 kişi olsaydı: Türkiye toplumu ve yaşam tarzları [If Turkey were 100 people: Turkish society and lifestyles]. https://konda.com.tr

34.

Leider

C. M.

Tigert

Norova

(2024). Teaching culturally and linguistically diverse learners: A content analysis of teacher professional organizations’ position statements. Teachers College Record, 126(3), 54–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681241252502

35.

Lopes

Oliveira

Costa

(2022). School and student determinants of reading performance: A multilevel analysis with Portuguese students. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 27(1), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2021.05.001

36.

Xiao

(2023). Mediation of self-concept and moderation of teacher support between SES and reading achievement: Evidence from China and the United States. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(4), 921–940. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12607

37.

McBreen

Savage

(2021). The impact of motivational reading instruction on the reading achievement and motivation of students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 1125–1163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09584-4

38.

Michael

Kyriakides

(2023). Mediating effects of motivation and socioeconomic status on reading achievement: A secondary analysis of PISA 2018. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 11, Article 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-023-00181-9

39.

Mullis

I. V. S.

von Davier

Foy

Fishbein

Reynolds

K. A.

Wry

(2023). PIRLS 2021 International results in reading. Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. https://doi.org/10.6017/lse.tpisc.tr2103.kb5342

40.

Nag

Vagh

S. B.

Dulay

K. M.

Snowling

M. J.

(2019). Home language, school language and children's literacy attainments: A systematic review of evidence from low- and middle-income countries. Review of Education, 7(1), 91–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3130

41.

Nilsen

Gustafsson

J. E.

(2014). School emphasis on academic success: Exploring changes in science performance in Norway between 2007 and 2011 employing two-level SEM. Educational Research and Evaluation, 20(4), 308–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2014.941371

42.

Ökten

M. S.

(2024). Türkiye’de dijital dönüşümün eğitimdeki fırsat eşit(siz)liği üzerindeki etkileri. [The effects of digital transformation on (in)equality of opportunity in education in Turkey]. Sosyolojik Bağlam, 5(3), 531–556.

43.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). 21st-century readers: Developing literacy skills in a digital world. OECD Publishing.

44.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). Student achievement in Türkiye: Findings from PISA and TIMSS international assessments. OECD Publishing.

45.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing.

46.

Pinnock

(2009). Language and education: The missing link. CfBT Education Trust & Save the Children.

47.

Rakesh

Lee

P. A.

Gaikwad

McLaughlin

K. A.

(2025). Annual research review: Associations of socioeconomic status with cognitive function, language ability, and academic achievement in youth—a systematic review of mechanisms and protective factors. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 66(4), 417–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.14082

48.

Salas

Pascual

(2023). Impact of school SES on literacy development. PLoS ONE, 18(12), e0295606. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295606

49.

Scherer

Nilsen

(2016). The relations among school climate, instructional quality, and achievement motivation in mathematics. In Nilsen

Gustafsson

J. E.

(Eds.), Teacher quality, instructional quality and student outcomes (Vol. 2, pp. 51–77). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41252-8_3

50.

Skutnabb-Kangas

(2000). Linguistic genocide in education—or worldwide diversity and human rights? Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410605191

51.

Tabachnick

B. G.

Fidell

L. S.

(2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson Education.

52.

Taylor

E. K.

Abdurokhmonova

Romeo

R. R.

(2023). Socioeconomic status and reading development: Moving from “deficit” to “adaptation” in neurobiological models of experience-dependent learning. Mind, Brain, and Education, 17(4), 324–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12351

53.

TEDMEM. (2021). Türkiye’nin telafi eğitimi yol haritası (TEDMEM Analiz Dizisi 9). [Turkey’s roadmap for remedial education]. Türk Eğitim Derneği Yayınları.

54.

Tomaszewski

Xiang

Huang

(2024). School climate, student engagement and academic achievement across school sectors in Australia. The Australian Educational Researcher, 51(2), 667–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-023-00618-8

55.

Toste

J. R.

Didion

Peng

Filderman

M. J.

McClelland

A. M.

(2020). A meta-analytic review of the relations between motivation and reading achievement for K–12 students. Review of Educational Research, 90(3), 420–456. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320919352

56.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2016). If you don’t understand, how can you learn? Global Education Monitoring Report Policy Paper 24. UNESCO.

57.

Yin

Reynolds

K. A.

(2023). Creating and interpreting the PIRLS 2021 context questionnaire scales. In von Davier

Mullis

I. V. S.

Fishbein

Foy

(Eds.), Methods and procedures: PIRLS 2021 technical report (pp. 15.1–15.161). Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. https://doi.org/10.6017/lse.tpisc.tr2103.kb6994

58.

Wani

E. A.

Ismail

H. H.

(2024). The effects of reading habits on academic performance among students in an ESL classroom: A literature review paper. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(1), 470–483. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i1/20207

59.

Weidl

Erling

E. J.

(2025). Exploring multilingualism to inform linguistically and culturally responsive English language education. Education Sciences, 15(6), 763. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15060763

60.

Willms

J. D.

(2022). From learning-to-read to reading-to-learn: Building confident learners. Learning Bar.

61.

World Bank. (2021). Loud and clear: Effective language of instruction policies for learning. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.

62.

Yadirgi

(2017). The political economy of the Kurds of Turkey: From the Ottoman Empire to the Turkish Republic. Cambridge University Press.

63.

Yang

Badri

Al Rashedi

Almazroui

(2018). The role of reading motivation, self-efficacy, and home influence in students’ literacy achievement: A preliminary examination of fourth graders in Abu Dhabi. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 6, Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-018-0063-0

64.

Scherer

Blömeke

(2024). Teachers’ and principals’ perceptions of school emphasis on academic success: Measurement invariance, agreement, and relations to student achievement. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 12, Article 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-024-00207-w

65.

Yeung

S. S.

King

R. B.

Nalipay

M. J. N.

Cai

(2022). Exploring the interplay between socioeconomic status and reading achievement: An expectancy-value perspective. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 1196–1214. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12495