Ultrasound is one of the most important medical imaging modalities for its real-time and portable imaging advantages. However, the contrast resolution and important details are degraded by the speckle in ultrasound images. Many speckle filtering methods have been developed, but they are suffered from several limitations, difficult to reach a balance between speckle reduction and edge preservation. In this paper, an adaptation of the nonlocal total variation (NLTV) filter is proposed for speckle reduction in ultrasound images. The speckle is modeled via a signal-dependent noise distribution for the log-compressed ultrasound images. Instead of the Euclidian distance, the statistical Pearson distance is introduced in this study for the similarity calculation between image patches via the Bayesian framework. And the Split-Bregman fast algorithm is used to solve the adapted NLTV despeckling functional. Experimental results on synthetic and clinical ultrasound images and comparisons with some classical and recent algorithms are used to demonstrate its improvements in both speckle noise reduction and tissue boundary preservation for ultrasound images.
LoizouCPPattichisCSChristodoulouCI.Comparative evaluation of despeckle filtering in ultrasound imaging of the carotid artery. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2005;52(10):1653-69.
2.
BaloccoSGattaCFerréJMRadevaP.Ultrasound despeckle methods. In: SanchesJMLaineAFSuriJS eds. Ultrasound Imaging: Advances and Applications. New York: Springer; 2012. pp. 49-71.
3.
Abd-ElmoniemKZYoussefABKadahYM.Real-time speckle reduction and coherence enhancement in ultrasound imaging via nonlinear anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2002;49(9):997-1014.
4.
BamberJCDaftC.Adaptive filtering for reduction of speckle in ultrasound pulse-echo images. Ultrasonics. 1986;24(1):41-4.
5.
DuttV.Statistical analysis of ultrasound echo envelope. PhD dissertation, Mayo Graduate School, Rochester, MN, 1995.
6.
ShankarPM.A general statistical model for ultrasonic backscattering from tissues. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2000;47(3):727-36.
7.
WagnerRFInsanaMF.Analysis of ultrasound image texture via generalized Rician statistics. Proc SPIE. 1985;556:153-59.
8.
AchimABezerianosATsakalidesP.Novel Bayesian multiscale method for speckle removal in medical ultrasound images. IEEE Trans Med Imag. 2001;20(8):772-83.
9.
TaoZTagareHDBeatyJD.Evaluation of four probability distribution models for speckle in clinical cardiac ultrasound images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2006;25(11):1483-91.
10.
CoupePHellierPKervrannCBarillotC.Nonlocal means-based speckle filtering for ultrasound images. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2009;18(10):2221-9.
11.
LeeJS.Digital image enhancement and noise filtering by use of local statistics. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1980;2(2):165-8.
12.
FrostVStilesJShanmuganKHoltzmanJ. A model for radar images and its application to adaptive digital filtering of multiplicative noise. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 9824(2):157-65.
13.
KuanDSawchuckAStrandTChavelP.Adaptive noise smoothing filter for images with signal-dependent noise. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1985;7(2):165-77.
14.
LoupasTMcDickenWAllanP.An adaptive weighted median filter for speckle suppression in medical ultrasonic images. IEEE Trans Circuit Syst. 1989;36(1):129-35.
15.
AysalTCBarnerKE.Rayleigh-maximum-likelihood filtering for speckle reduction of ultrasound images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2007;26(5):712-27.
16.
BuadesACollBMorelJM.A review of image denoising algorithms, with a new one. Multiscale Model Sim. 2005;4:490-530.
17.
GuoYWangYHouT.Speckle filtering of ultrasonic images using a modified non local-based algorithm. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2011;6(2):129-38.
18.
ZongXLaineAFGeiserEA.Speckle reduction and contrast enhancement of echocardiograms via multiscale nonlinear processing. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998;17(4):532-40.
19.
AchimABezerianosATsakalidesP.Novel Bayesian multiscale method for speckle removal in medical ultrasound images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001;20(8):772-83.
20.
PizuricaAWinkAMVansteenkisteEPhilipsWRoerdinkJ.A review of wavelet denoising in MRI and ultrasound brain imaging. Curr Med Imag Rev. 2006;2(2):247-60.
21.
PeronaPMalikJ.Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1990;12(7):629-39.
22.
RudinLOsherSFatemiE.Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. Phys D. 1992;60(1-4):259-68.
23.
YuYActonST.Speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2002;11(11):1260-70.
24.
KrissianKWestinCFKikinisRVosburghKG.Oriented speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2007;16(5):1412-24.
25.
GilboaGOsherS.Nonlocal operators with applications to image processing. Multiscale Model Sim. 2007;7(3):595-630.
26.
MumfordD.The Bayesian rationale for energy functional. In: MumfordD, ed. Geometry Driven Diffusion in Computer Vision. New York: Springer; 1994. pp. 141-53.
27.
GilboaGOsherS.Nonlocal linear image regularization and supervised segmentation. Multiscale Model Sim. 2007;6(2):595-630.
Aja-FernándezSAlberola-LópezC.On the estimation of the coefficient of variation for anisotropic diffusion speckle filtering. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2006;15(9):2694-701.
31.
WangZBovikACSheikhHRSimoncelliEP.Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2004;13(4):600-12.
32.
JensenJAField: a program for simulating ultrasound systems. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1996;34:351-3.
33.
WenTXZhuQSQinWJLiLYangFXieY. An accurate and effective FMM-based approach for freehand 3D ultrasound reconstruction, Biomed Signal Process Control. 2013;8(6):600-12.
34.
ChenXKWenTXLiXMQinWLanDPanW. Reconstruction of freehand 3D ultrasound based on kernel regression. Biomed Eng Online. 2014;13:124-39.
