A general method for improving image resolution is derived and applied to ultrasound signals; it combines the principles of both reflection mode tomography and deconvolution. The different possibilities of applying these principles allow two types of approaches to be defined, depending upon whether image reconstruction is achieved on radiofrequency or detected signals. A thorough description of three methods that are of particular interest due to their lower computation costs is presented, and their results quantified. They permit a gain in resolution of the order of ten with respect to two-dimensional deconvolution of images, as well as an improvement of the S/N ratio, which is related to the square root of the number of projections used in the reconstruction process, and a decrease of about four in computation time.
GreenleafJ.F.JohnsonS.A., Measurement of spatial distribution of refractive index in tissues by ultrasonic computer-assisted tomography, Ultrasound in Med. and Biol.3, 327–339 (1978).
DinesK.A.FryF.J.PatrickJ.T.GilmorR.L., Computerized ultrasound tomography of the human head: experimental results, Ultrasonic Imaging3, 342–351 (1981).
4.
WadeG., Ultrasonic Imaging by Reconstructive Tomography in Acoustical imaging, Vol. 9, WangK.Y. ed., pp. 379–417 (Plenum Press, (1980).
StapperM.SollieG., Ultrasound Transmission Tomography by Means of a Personal Computer, in Ultrasonics International Proc., pp. 935–940, (London, 1985).
7.
GreenleafJ.F.ThomasP.J.RajagopalanB., Effects of Diffraction on Ultrasonic Computer-assisted Tomography, in Acoustical Imaging, vol. 11, PowersJ.B. ed., pp. 351–363 (Plenum Press1982).
8.
DevaneyA.J., A filtered backpropagation algorithm for diffraction tomography, Ultrasonic Imaging4, 336–350 (1982).
9.
DevaneyA.J., A computer simulation study of diffraction tomography, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engin.30, 377–386 (1983).
10.
SoumekhM.KavehM., A theoretical study of model approximation errors in diffraction tomography, IEEE Trans, Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics Freq. control33, 10–20 (1986).
11.
McKinnonG.C.BatesR.H., A limitation on ultrasonic transmission tomography, Ultrasonic Imaging2, 48–54 (1980).
12.
NortonS.J.LinzerM., Correcting for ray refraction in velocity and attenuation tomography: a perturbation approach, Ultrasonic Imaging4, 201–233 (1982).
NortonS.J.LinzerM., Ultrasonic reflectivity imaging in three dimensions: reconstruction with spherical transducer arrays, Ultrasonic Imaging1, 210–231 (1979).
17.
MaderlechnerG.HundtE.KronmüllerE.TrautenbergE., Experimental results of computerized ultrasound echo tomography, in Acoustical Imaging, vol. 10, AlaisP.MetherellA.F. eds., pp. 415–425, (Plenum Press, 1981).
18.
LefebvreJ.P., Vers une Echographie Quantitative: La Tomographie d'impédance Acoustique, in Proc. Problémes Inverses et Applications, pp. 86–92, (January 10–13, Paris, France 1983).
PapoulisA.ChamzasC., Improvement of range resolution by spectral extrapolation, Ultrasonic Imaging1, 121–135 (1979).
21.
LiuN.C.FatemiM.WaagR.C., Digital processing for improvement of ultrasonic abdominal images, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging21, 66–75 (1983).
22.
RobinsonD.E.WingM., Lateral deconvolution of ultrasonic beams, Ultrasonic Imaging6, 1–12 (1984).
23.
HermentA.GuglielmiJ.P.DuméePh.PéronneauP.DeloucheP., Limitations of ultrasound imaging and image restoration, Ultrasonics27, 267–273 (1987).
24.
DemomentG.ReynaudR.HermentA., Range resolution improvement by a fast deconvolution method, Ultrasonic Imaging4, 435–451 (1984).
25.
Saint-FelixD.HermentA.DuX.C., Fast Deconvolution Application to Acoustical Imaging, in Ultrasonic tissue characterization and Echographic Imaging, ThijssenJ.M.MasseoV. eds., vol. 5, pp. 161–172 (Faculty of medicine printing office Nijmegen1985).
26.
Image Reconstruction from Projections: Topics in applied Physics, vol. 32, HermanG.T. ed., pp. 29–36 (Springer Verlag, 1979).
27.
FatemiM.KakA.C., Ultrasonic B-scan imaging: theory of image formation and a technique for restoration, Ultrasonic Imaging2, 1–47 (1980).
28.
LynnP.A., On-line digital filters for biological signals: some fast design for a small computer, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing15, 534–540 (1977).
29.
BerkhoutA.J.RidderJ.van der WalL.F., Acoustic Imaging by Wave Field Extrapolation. Part I: Theoretical Considerations, in Acoustical Imaging, vol. 10, AlaisP.MetherellA.F. eds., pp. 513–540 (Plenum Press, 1981).
30.
BerkhoutA.J.RidderJ.van der WalL.F., Acoustic Imaging by Wave Field Extrapolation. Part II: Practical aspects, in Acoustical Imaging, vol. 10, AlaisP.MetherellA.F. eds., pp. 541–565 (Plenum Press, 1981).
31.
GehlbachS.M.AlvarezR.E., Digital ultrasound imaging technique using vector sampling and raster line reconstruction. Ultrasonic Imaging3, 83–107 (1981).
