The application of fractal analysis to parametric imaging of B-mode echograms and to differentation of echographic speckle textures was investigated. Echograms were obtained from realistic simulations and from a clinical study on diffuse liver disease. The simulations comprised tissue models with randomly positioned scatterers in a 3-D volume in which the number density was varied over a range from 0.5 to 25 mm–3. The clinical echograms comprised both normals and patients with liver cirrhosis. Three methods of estimating the fractal dimension were investigated, two in the spatial image domain and one in the spatial frequency domain. The results of these methods are compared and the applicability and the limitations of texture differentiation using fractal analysis is discussed. The main conclusion is that fractal analysis offers no obvious advantage over statistical analysis of the texture of echographic images. Its use for parametric imaging is further limited by the need to use relatively large windows for local estimation of the fractal dimension.
InsanaM.F.WagnerR.F.GarraB.S.BrownD.G.ShawkerT.H.Analysis of ultrasound image texture via generalized Rician statistics, Opt. Eng.25, 743–748 (1986).
2.
GarraB.S.InsanaM.F.ShawkerT.H.RussellM.A.Quantitative estimation of liver estimation and echogenicity: normal state versus diffuse liver disease, Radiology162, 61–67 (1987).
3.
FellinghamL.L.SommerF.G.Ultrasonic characterization of tissue structure in the in vivo human liver and spleen, IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultrason.SU-31, 418–428 (1984).
4.
HartmanP.C.OosterveldB.J.ThijssenJ.M.RosenbuschG.J.E.van den BergJ.Detection and differentiation of diffuse liver disease by quantitative echography: a retrospective assessment, Invest. Radiol.28, 1–6 (1993).
5.
OosterveldB.J.ThijssenJ.M.HartmanP.C.RosenbuschG.J.E.Detection of diffuse liver disease by quantitative echography: dependence on a priori choice of parameters, Ultrasound Med. Biol.19, 21–25 (1993).
6.
RomijnR.L.ThijssenJ.M.OosterveldB.J.VerbeekA.M.Ultrasonic differentiation of intraocular melanomas: parameters and estimation methods, Ultrasonic Imaging13, 27–55 (1991).
7.
ThijssenJ.M.OosterveldB.J.HartmanP.C.RosenbuschG.J.E.Correlations between acoustic and texture parameters from RF and B-mode liver echograms, Ultrasound Med. Biol.19, 13–20 (1993).
SchlapsD.ZunaI.WalzM.VolkJ.RaethU.Ultrasonic tissue characterization by texture analysis: Estimation of tissue independent factors, in Proc. SPIE Congress, Vol. 768, FerrariL.A., ed., pp. 128–134 (SPIE, Bellingham, 1987).
10.
OosterveldB.J.ThijssenJ.M.VerhoefW.A.Texture of B-mode echograms: 3-D simulations and experiments of the effects of diffraction and scatterer density, Ultrasonic Imaging7, 142–160 (1985).
11.
WagnerR.F.InsanaM.F.BrownD.G.Unified approach to the detection and classification of speckle texture in diagnostic ultrasound, Opt. Eng.25, 738–742 (1986).
12.
WagnerR.F.InsanaM.F.BrownD.G.Statistical properties of radio-frequency and envelope-detected signals with applications to medical ultrasound, J. Optical Soc. Am.4, 910–922 (1987).
13.
InsanaM.F.WagnerR.F.GarraB.S.BrownD.G.Analysis of ultrasound image texture via generalized Rician statistics, J. Opt. Eng.25, 743–748 (1986).
14.
AbbottJ.G.ThurstoneF.L.Acoustic speckle: theory and experimental analysis, Ultrasonic Imaging1, 303–324 (1979).
BamberJ.C.DickinsonR.J.Ultrasonic B-scanning: A computer simulation, Phys. Med. Biol.25, 463–479 (1980).
17.
WagnerR.F.SmithS.W.SandrikJ.M.LopezH.Statistics of speckle in ultrasound B-scans, IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultrasonics30, 156–163 (1983).
18.
JakemanE.Speckle statistics with small number of scatterers, Opt. Eng.23, 453–461 (1984).
19.
CardosoJ.-F.3-D Ultrasonic speckle modeling: Below the Rayleigh limit, in Proc. SPIE Int. Symp. on Pattern Recognition and Acoustical Imaging, FerrariL.A., ed., pp. 207–214 (SPIE, Bellingham, 1987).
20.
FosterD.E.ArditiM.FosterF.S.PattersonM.S.HuntJ.W.Computer simulations of speckle in B-mode images, Ultrasonic Imaging5, 308–330 (1983).
MesdagP.R.Estimation of Medium Parameters by Acoustic Echo Measurements, (Thesis, Delft University of Technology, 1985).
23.
JacobsE.M.G.ThijssenJ.M.A simulation study of echographic imaging of diffuse and structurally scattering media, Ultrasonic Imaging13, 316–333 (1991).
24.
NicholasD.Evaluation of backscattering coefficients for excised human tissues: results, interpretation and associated measurements, Ultrasound in Med. Biol.8, 17–28 (1982).
25.
KellerJ.M.ChenS.CrownoverR.M.Texture description and segmentation through fractal geometry, Comp. Vision Graphics Image Process.45, 150–166 (1989).
26.
ChenC.C.DaponteJ.S.FoxM.D.Fractal features analysis and classification in medical imaging, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging8, 133–143 (1989).
27.
GårdingJ.Properties of fractal intensity surfaces, Pattern Recognition Letters8, 319–324 (1988).
28.
ZähleU.Sets and measures of fractional dimension, Journ. of Inform. Process. and Cybernetics20, 261–269 (1984).
29.
MussigmannU.Texture analysis, fractals and scale space filtering, in Proc. 6th Scandinavian Conf. on Image Analysis, Oulo, pp. 987–994 (1989).
30.
MussigmanU.Homogeneous Fractals and their Application in Texture Analysis, in Proceedings of the 1st IFIP Conf. on Fractals, PeitgenH.O.HenriquesJ.M.PenedoL.F., eds. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1990).
31.
MandelbrotB.B.The Fractal Geometry of Nature (W.H. Freeman and company, New York, 1963).
32.
PentlandA.P.Fractal based description of natural scenes, IEEE Trans. Pattern Analys. and Mach. Intell.PAMI-6, 661–674 (1984).
AdlerR.J.The Geometry of Random Fields (Wiley, New York, 1981).
41.
JacobsE.M.G.P.ThijssenJ.M.A simulation study of echographic imaging of diffuse and structurally scattering media, Ultrasonic Imaging13, 316–333 (1991).
42.
KayS.M.MarpleS.L.Spectrum analysis — a modern perspective, Proc. IEEE69, 1380–1419 (1981).
43.
MakhoulJ.Linear prediction: a tutorial review, Proc. IEEE63, 561–580 (1975).
44.
VerhoevenJ.T.M.ThijssenJ.M.TheeuwesA.G.M.Improvement of lesion detection by echographic image processing: signal-to-noise-ratio imaging, Ultrasonic Imaging13, 238–251 (1991).
