During the past 20 years, a significant body of literature has emerged focusing on the application of Dabrowski's theory of positive disintegration (TPD) to the study of gifted individuals. Although much of this literature is prescriptive, some research reports spanning this time period are available. A perusal of research on TPD's applicability to gifted individuals indicates that the focus has been Dabrowski's notion of overexcitability (OE). This article reviews OE research, contrasts it with Dabrowski's approach to research with gifted individuals, and argues that researchers should emulate Dabrowski's approach in future investigations.
BouchardL. L. (2004). An instrument for the measure of Dabrowskian overexcitabilities to identify gifted elementary students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 339–350.
3.
BouchetN., & FalkR. F. (2001). The relationship among giftedness, gender, and overexcitability. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45, 260–267.
4.
CashA. B. (1999). A profile of gifted individuals with autism: The twice-exceptional learner. Roeper Review, 22, 22–21.
5.
ClarkB. (1983). Growing up gifted (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
DabrowskiK. (1967). Personality-shaping through positive disintegration. Boston: Little, Brown.
8.
DabrowskiK. (1970). Mental growth through positive disintegration. London: Gryf.
9.
DabrowskiK. (1972). Psychoneurosis is not an illness. London: Gryf.
10.
DabrowskiK. (1973). The dynamics of concepts. London: Gryf.
11.
FalkR. F., ManzaneroJ. B., & MillerN. B. (1997). Developmental potential in Venezuelan and American artists: A cross-cultural validity study. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 201–206.
12.
FalkR. R., LindS., MillerN. B., PiechowskiM. M., & SilvermanL. K. (1999). The Overexcitability Questionnaire-Two (OEQII): Manual, scoring system, and questionnaire. Denver, CO: Institute for the Study of Advanced Development.
13.
FiedlerE. D. (1998). Denial of anger/denial of self: Dealing with the dilemmas. Roeper Review, 20, 158–161.
14.
FlintL. J. (2001). Challenges of identifying and serving gifted children with ADHD. Teaching Exceptional Children, 33, 62–69.
15.
GageD. F., MorseP. A., & PiechowskiM. M. (1981). Measuring levels of emotional development. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 103, 129–152.
16.
GallagherS. A. (1986). A comparison of the concept of overexcitabilities with measures of creativity and school achievement in sixth grade students. Roeper Review, 8, 115–119.
17.
GustK. L. (1996). Assessing the social and emotional needs of the gifted: Using the Children's Self-Report and Projective Inventory as a potential tool. Gifted Child Today, 19, 38–40.
18.
Gust-BreyK., & CrossT. (1999). An examination of the literature base on the suicidal behaviors of gifted students. Roeper Review, 22, 28–35.
19.
HazellC. G. (1999). The experience of emptiness and the use of Dabrowskis theory in counseling gifted clients: Clinical case examples. Advanced Development: A Journal on Adult Giftedness, 8, 31–46.
20.
KhatenaJ., & TorranceE. P. (1976). Manual for Khatena-Torrance Creative Personality Perception Inventory. Chicago: Stoelting.
21.
LewisR. B., & KitanoM. K. (1992). Psychological intensities in gifted adults. Roeper Review, 15, 25–31.
22.
LysyK. Z. (1979). Personal growth in counselors and noncounselors: A Jungian and Dabrowskian approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
23.
LysyK. Z., & PiechowskiM.M. (1983). Personal growth: An empirical study using Jungian and Dabrowskian measures. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 108, 267–320.
24.
MendaglioS. (1998). Counselling gifted students: Issues and recommendations for teachers and counselors. AGATE, 12, 18–25.
25.
MendaglioS., & PyrytM. C. (2004, June). The role of intelligence in Dabrowski's theory of positive disintegration. In TillierW. (ed.), Developmental potential—from theory to practice: Educational and therapeutic perspectives. Unpublished manuscript. (Proceedings from the Sixth International Congress of the Institute for Positive Disintegration in Human Development, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.)
26.
MillerN. B., SilvermanL. K., & FalkR. F. (1994). Emotional development, intellectual ability, and gender. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18, 20–38.
27.
MorrisseyA. M. (1996). Intellect as prelude: The potential for higher level development in the gifted. Advanced Development: A Journal on Adult Giftedness, 7, 101–116.
28.
MurrayH. A. (1943). Thematic Apperception Test manual. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
NixonL. (2005). Potential for positive disintegration and IQ. The Dabrowski Newsletter, 10 (2), 1–5.
30.
ColangeloM. K. Ogburn (1989). Giftedness as multilevel potential: A clinical example. Advanced Development: A Journal on Adult Giftedness, 1, 87–100.
31.
PiechowskiM. M. (1975). A theoretical and empirical approach to the study of development. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 92, 231–297.
32.
PiechowskiM. M. (1979). Developmental potential. In ColangeloN. & ZaffrannR. T. (eds.), New voices in counseling the gifted (pp. 25–57). Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
33.
PiechowskiM. M. (1986). The concept of developmental potential. Roeper Review, 8, 190–197.
34.
PiechowskiM. M. (1991). Emotional development and emotional giftedness. In ColangeloN. & DavisG. (eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 285–306). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
35.
PiechowskiM. M., & CunninghamK. (1985). Patterns of overexcitability in a group of artists. Journal of Creative Behavior, 19, 153–174.
36.
PiechowskiM. M., SilvermanL., & FalkF. (1985). Comparison of intellectually and artistically gifted on five dimensions of mental functions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 60, 539–549.
37.
RorschachH. (1921). Psychodiagnostics: Diagnostic perception. New York: Grune & Stratton.
38.
SchieverS. W. (1985). Creative personality characteristics and dimensions of mental functioning in gifted adolescents. Roeper Review, 7, 223–226.
39.
SilvermanL. K., & EllsworthB. (1981). The theory of positive disintegration and its implications for giftedness. In DudaN. (ed.), Theory of positive disintegration: Proceedings of the third international conference (pp. 179–194). Miami, FL: Xerox.
40.
TiesoC. L. (1999). Meeting the socio-emotional needs of talented teens. Gifted Child Today, 22, 38–43.
41.
TuckerB., & HafensteinN. (1997). Psychological intensities in young gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41, 66–75.
42.
WechslerD. (1939). The measurement of adult intelligence. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
